[patch] kfreebsd S10syslog

2009-07-20 Thread Luca Favatella
This patch adds GNU/kFreeBSD S10syslog. It is different from the GNU/Linux one not only because not calling klogd, but also for the absence of a Linux specific command (modprobe unix...). I tested this on GNU/kFreeBSD. It should not affect GNU/Linux. Cheers, Luca Favatella Index: debian/chang

Bug#537210: marked as done (libbsd: FTBFS: build fail on Renesas SH(sh4))

2009-07-20 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:39:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#537210: fixed in libbsd 0.1.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #537210, regarding libbsd: FTBFS: build fail on Renesas SH(sh4) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

libbsd_0.1.5-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2009-07-20 Thread Archive Administrator
Accepted: libbsd-dev_0.1.5-1_amd64.deb to pool/main/libb/libbsd/libbsd-dev_0.1.5-1_amd64.deb libbsd0-dbg_0.1.5-1_amd64.deb to pool/main/libb/libbsd/libbsd0-dbg_0.1.5-1_amd64.deb libbsd0-udeb_0.1.5-1_amd64.udeb to pool/main/libb/libbsd/libbsd0-udeb_0.1.5-1_amd64.udeb libbsd0_0.1.5-1_amd64.deb

Re: kFreeBSD progress report week 8

2009-07-20 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Luca Favatella writes: > It seems it is not enough. > It has only ifconfig > http://packages.debian.org/sid/kfreebsd-i386/inetutils-tools/filelist Hmm, actually it has more than this, but it seems to lack `route', for instance: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/inetutils.git/tree/ Thanks, Lud

Re: kFreeBSD progress report week 8

2009-07-20 Thread Luca Favatella
On 20/07/2009, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi, Hi. > > Luca Favatella writes: > > [...] > >> on the deb package, there is a different script for GNU/kFreeBSD and >> GNU/Linux, but the GNU/kFreeBSD version needs "ifconfig" and >> "route". I considered porting and switching to BusyBox udhcpc. > > (I

Re: kFreeBSD progress report week 8

2009-07-20 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Luca Favatella writes: [...] > on the deb package, there is a different script for GNU/kFreeBSD and > GNU/Linux, but the GNU/kFreeBSD version needs "ifconfig" and > "route". I considered porting and switching to BusyBox udhcpc. (I haven't studied the question in depth, so pardon me if this

Re: kFreeBSD progress report week 8

2009-07-20 Thread Luca Favatella
On 20/07/2009, Petr Salinger wrote: >> It seems that all DHCP clients (dhcp3-client and busybox udhcpc) need >> other binaries, i.e. >> * "ip", or >> * "ifconfig" + "route" >> >> I think the right way to get things work should be having a working >> BusyBox "ip" command on GNU/kFreeBSD. Any commen

Re: kFreeBSD progress report week 8

2009-07-20 Thread Petr Salinger
It seems that all DHCP clients (dhcp3-client and busybox udhcpc) need other binaries, i.e. * "ip", or * "ifconfig" + "route" I think the right way to get things work should be having a working BusyBox "ip" command on GNU/kFreeBSD. Any comment? Wouldn't be possible somehow create and use udeb fr

Re: kFreeBSD progress report week 8

2009-07-20 Thread Luca Favatella
On 20/07/2009, Luca Favatella wrote: [...] > While debugging netcfg, I discovered that "/var/log/syslog" is not > created, even manually executing syslogd. Currently, in d-i, BusyBox > syslogd is used. My mentor solved this. See: http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/d-i?view=rev&revision=59407 > Even