Java SDK

2009-05-20 Thread Anton Andreev
Hi, I can not install "default-jdk" nor "openjdk-6-jre". Does anyone have successfully installed Java SDK on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD? -Anton - Original Message - From: "Ludovic Courtès" To: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 2:34:49 AM GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut, Bucha

Re: tomcat6

2009-05-20 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Anton Andreev writes: > Do you think Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is stable enough for a LAMP, Tomcat > server OS? I don't know. I haven't used it long enough to have anything to say about its stability. Thanks, Ludo'. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subje

Re: tomcat6

2009-05-20 Thread Anton Andreev
Hi, Do you think Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is stable enough for a LAMP, Tomcat server OS? Cheers, Anton - Original Message - From: "Ludovic Courtès" To: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 12:48:43 AM GMT +02:00 Athens, Beirut, Bucharest, Istanbul Subject: Re: tomcat6 He

Re: tomcat6

2009-05-20 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Anton Andreev writes: > Is tomcat available on Debian / kfreeBSD? Apparently yes: http://packages.debian.org/sid/tomcat6 . BTW, the proper name is "Debian GNU/kFreeBSD". Thanks, Ludo'. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". T

tomcat6

2009-05-20 Thread Anton Andreev
Hi, Is tomcat available on Debian / kfreeBSD? Cheers, Anton -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#529639: freebsd-utils: [INTL:ru] Russian debconf templates translation

2009-05-20 Thread Yuri Kozlov
Package: freebsd-utils Version: 7.1-5 Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n patch Russian debconf templates translation is attached. -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64 (SMP w/4

Re: libbsd

2009-05-20 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Guillem Jover dixit: >Your version seems to leak the buffer every time it's getting called. Hm, indeed. Damn. Thanks for pointing this out. //mirabilos -- “It is inappropriate to require that a time represented as seconds since the Epoch precisely represent the number of seconds between the r