Re: [patch]Re: debootstrap on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD + questions

2009-03-15 Thread Otavio Salvador
Luca Favatella writes: > On 15/03/2009, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> Luca Favatella writes: > [...] >>> I tried to run kbsd-debootstrap.sh (the refreshed one by me). I got: > [...] >> First I'm curious why to use another script to install instead of >> regular debootstrap. Did you try to "merge" y

Re: [patch]Re: debootstrap on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD + questions

2009-03-15 Thread Luca Favatella
On 15/03/2009, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Luca Favatella writes: [...] >> I tried to run kbsd-debootstrap.sh (the refreshed one by me). I got: [...] > First I'm curious why to use another script to install instead of > regular debootstrap. Did you try to "merge" your required changes in > debootstr

Re: [patch]Re: debootstrap on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD + questions

2009-03-15 Thread Luca Favatella
On 15/03/2009, Luk Claes wrote: > Otavio Salvador wrote: >> Luca Favatella writes: [...] >>> It seems to me that in debootstrap: >>> -or libbsd0 (and other packages) are downloaded but not extracted >>> -or mount is called too early >> >> It happens depending on the priority so mount is called

Re: [patch]Re: debootstrap on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD + questions

2009-03-15 Thread Luca Favatella
On 15/03/2009, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Luk Claes writes: > >> Otavio Salvador wrote: [...] >>> While I understand why those options are required I dislike the idea to >>> have them at official deboostrap. >> >> They are more generally useful though. Everyone who wants to test with >> adding ex

OpenJDK & Cacao & GCJ & Java defaults in unstable

2009-03-15 Thread Matthias Klose
Hi, openjdk-6 in unstable is updated to the 6b14 code drop, built from a recent IcedTea snapshot. There are a few regressions in the ports which don't use the hotspot VM, but the Zero VM. Help from porters would be appreciated. There are two new binary packages offering additional JVMs: - openj

Re: [patch]Re: debootstrap on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD + questions

2009-03-15 Thread Otavio Salvador
Luk Claes writes: > Otavio Salvador wrote: [...] >> This looks to be the wrong way to fix missing dependencies for a >> specific kernel. I belive the right way to fix it is to have override >> based on kernel and then allow packages to have different sections and >> priorities depending on it.

Re: [patch]Re: debootstrap on Debian GNU/kFreeBSD + questions

2009-03-15 Thread Luk Claes
Otavio Salvador wrote: > Luca Favatella writes: > >> On 13/03/2009, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >>> Luca Favatella (12/03/2009): Can you please tell me if - someone already wrote patches for debootstrap to support more than a suite (at the same time, i.e. sid and unreleased)? >>> http