Re: GCC 4.2 transition

2007-07-20 Thread Jurij Smakov
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:16:27AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > The plans for the GCC 4.2 transition were described in > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/06/msg8.html > > Does any port still need to stick with GCC 4.1 for a while? Feedback > from hppa, mips*, s390, po

Reestructuration of armel and kfreebsd-any repos at GNUAB

2007-07-20 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi, The kfreebsd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64 and armel repos at GNUAB now carry the pure arch:all packages mirrored from the main archive. The previously needed sources.list deb line hack[0] is not anymore. This will also make it easier to work on D-I and stop bothering users about unathenticated package

Re: GCC 4.2 transition

2007-07-20 Thread Neil McGovern
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:51:47AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:33:01AM +0200, Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 10:16 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > > > Does any port still need to stick with GCC 4.1 for a while? Feedback > > > fr

Re: GCC 4.2 transition

2007-07-20 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:33:01AM +0200, Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 10:16 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > Does any port still need to stick with GCC 4.1 for a while? Feedback > > from hppa, mips*, s390, powerpc, amd64, i386 porters doesn't show > > objec

Re: GCC 4.2 transition

2007-07-20 Thread Johannes Berg
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 10:16 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Does any port still need to stick with GCC 4.1 for a while? Feedback > from hppa, mips*, s390, powerpc, amd64, i386 porters doesn't show > objections against the transition. I have objections :) http://bugs.debian.org/433629 Yes, it's pr

GCC 4.2 transition

2007-07-20 Thread Matthias Klose
The plans for the GCC 4.2 transition were described in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/06/msg8.html Does any port still need to stick with GCC 4.1 for a while? Feedback from hppa, mips*, s390, powerpc, amd64, i386 porters doesn't show objections against the transition.