FYI: The status of the kfreebsd-5 source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 5.4-19
Current version: 5.4-20
--
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.
-
Look at r1727 on
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/glibc-bsd/?op=log&rev=0&sc=0&isdir=1
I see. Well I suppose we should be doing different things then, maybe I'll
focus on the packages with no bug in BTS. Btw darkice's build-deps need the
same fix for kfreebsd-amd64 and hurd-i386 as it did for kfreebsd
On Sat 18 Nov 2006 14:07, Petr Salinger wrote:
> Hi.
>
> > While going through some of the packages in NOTES [1] I noticed that the
> > darkice package is FTBFS again after being claimed fixed. It used to be
> > FTBFS because of bad build-deps but now it is something different:
> > from the build l
Hi.
While going through some of the packages in NOTES [1] I noticed that the
darkice package is FTBFS again after being claimed fixed. It used to be FTBFS
because of bad build-deps but now it is something different:
from the build log [2]:
It looks like we are currently doing the same thing :-
Hello all,
While going through some of the packages in NOTES [1] I noticed that the
darkice package is FTBFS again after being claimed fixed. It used to be FTBFS
because of bad build-deps but now it is something different:
from the build log [2]:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.-O2 -pedantic
5 matches
Mail list logo
