Status FreeBSD libc5?

2003-11-30 Thread jse
Hello, I was just wondering what the status of the debian-bsd stuff in general. I have looked back a few months in the mailing list archives and I didn't really get a feel for what the current direction is. I noticed some postings earlier this month about NetBSD and glibc. They also refere

Re: Glibc-based Debian GNU/KNetBSD

2003-11-30 Thread Perry E . Metzger
Nathan Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Although it is still not as stable as we'd like, the benchmarks of the >> native threads on NetBSD are pretty damn impressive. I'd say that not >> using the native threads would be a tremendous waste... > > For my part, I'm of the opinion that threads

Re: Glibc-based Debian GNU/KNetBSD

2003-11-30 Thread Nathan Hawkins
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 07:31:09PM -0500, Perry E.Metzger wrote: > > Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > Please, how is threading implemented in the NetBSD (and FreeBSD) port > >> > of Glibc? > >> > >> On the FreeBSD port, it uses linuxthreads. It isn't going to be good > >> enough long

Re: Glibc-based Debian GNU/KNetBSD

2003-11-30 Thread Perry E . Metzger
Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > Please, how is threading implemented in the NetBSD (and FreeBSD) port >> > of Glibc? >> >> On the FreeBSD port, it uses linuxthreads. It isn't going to be good >> enough long term. >> >> The NetBSD port of glibc will probably do the same, at least init