re: I've got a bad feeling about this...

NetBSD. Licensing. Appears to be old (non-revised) BSD license... certainly the INSTALL.txt file for 1.6 has lines at the beginning of the ungodly long section for the NetBSD project (in two forms, no less!) Pardon me while I sink into despair of ever untangling the mess,

I've got a bad feeling about this...

NetBSD. Licensing. Appears to be old (non-revised) BSD license... certainly the INSTALL.txt file for 1.6 has lines at the beginning of the ungodly long section for the NetBSD project (in two forms, no less!) Pardon me while I sink into despair of ever untangling the mess, even if we can use it (i

Re: status quo and userlands

On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:58:04AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.15.0003 +0200]: > > I can provide a tarball of my working chroot as it stands, if you > > want it; apt works, dpkg works, X works, and a number of userland > > things are quite ope

Re: status quo and userlands

also sprach Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.15.0003 +0200]: > I can provide a tarball of my working chroot as it stands, if you > want it; apt works, dpkg works, X works, and a number of userland > things are quite operable. Still working on what will be needed for > a proper base.tgz so we

Re: status quo and userlands

On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 11:54:16PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > hi there, > > are there any plans on providing Debian NetBSD with the BSD userland? > > and wrt Debian GNU/NetBSD... is it ready to be deployed on servers, or > is it still in a rather experimental phase? > > thanks, The latest

status quo and userlands

hi there, are there any plans on providing Debian NetBSD with the BSD userland? and wrt Debian GNU/NetBSD... is it ready to be deployed on servers, or is it still in a rather experimental phase? thanks, -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin