Re: thoughts on architectures

2002-02-03 Thread Philip Charles
On Sun, 3 Feb 2002, Andreas Schuldei wrote: > Markus Brinkmanm (of HURD fame) has written this > http://master.debian.org/~brinkmd/arch-handling.txt > which is mandatory reading for us. > > they (the hurd people) are very interested in working closely > together with us, simply since we together

re: Revised TODO

2002-02-03 Thread matthew green
As I said, FreeBSD's resolver really didn't like the Linux version of the file, which is in base-files. OK. i'm fairly sure this won't affect the netbsd port cuz it won't be used at all as far as i can tell...

Re: Revised TODO

2002-02-03 Thread utsl
It's kind of an alternative to nsswitch.conf. I'm not sure why it exists... It looks like this on FreeBSD: skaro:/skaro# cat /etc/host.conf # $FreeBSD: src/etc/host.conf,v 1.6 1999/08/27 23:23:41 peter Exp $ # First try the /etc/hosts file hosts # Now try the nameserver next. bind # If you have Y

re: patches

2002-02-03 Thread matthew green
Modified now that Matthew's pointed out that RB_POWERDOWN exists. (btw, "halt -p" and "shutdown -p" access this from the NetBSD userland.)

Re: patches

2002-02-03 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 06:53:28PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Excellent. Mind sending me a diff against my patch, so I can merge it > together, > and send upstream? Modified now that Matthew's pointed out that RB_POWERDOWN exists. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff -u -r ./debi

re: Revised TODO

2002-02-03 Thread matthew green
I plan to just replace ifconfig. The major headache is ifupdown. FYI, watch out for /etc/host.conf. The Linux version badly broke FreeBSD's resolver. what is host.conf? don't think netbsd uses it.

Re: Self-hosting Debian NetBSD system available

2002-02-03 Thread utsl
Hmm. Not sure what's going on with Fakeroot there. It worked ok on FreeBSD. If you get it working, please send me a patch. I'll merge it, and we can try to get support for both archs merged in upstream. On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 11:02:22PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote: > I now have a self-hosting D

Re: patches

2002-02-03 Thread utsl
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 09:39:50PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote: > Two minor changes needed (other than s/freebsd/netbsd) for the sysvinit > patch - NetBSD's reboot() doesn't seem to do poweroff, so I changed that > #define to just halt the system, and reboot() takes two arguments, magic > and a st

re: patches

2002-02-03 Thread matthew green
Two minor changes needed (other than s/freebsd/netbsd) for the sysvinit patch - NetBSD's reboot() doesn't seem to do poweroff, so I changed that #define to just halt the system, and reboot() takes two arguments, magic and a string that can be passed to the firmware under certain cir

Self-hosting Debian NetBSD system available

2002-02-03 Thread Matthew Garrett
I now have a self-hosting Debian NetBSD system. The patch to sysvinit seems to have worked wonderfully, though several boot scripts are not entirely happy due to commands having different semantics. Networking isn't automatically set up yet (the ifupdown source is distributed in some weird format a

Re: ed package

2002-02-03 Thread Tony Finch
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > >Sounds good. I'm going to see if I can patch that implementation into the >FreeBSD libc. That would solve a lot of headaches for me. FreeBSD's libc already has getopt, since it has been in BSD libc for over 16 years. But getopt_long is another matter.

Re: patches

2002-02-03 Thread Matthew Garrett
Two minor changes needed (other than s/freebsd/netbsd) for the sysvinit patch - NetBSD's reboot() doesn't seem to do poweroff, so I changed that #define to just halt the system, and reboot() takes two arguments, magic and a string that can be passed to the firmware under certain circumstances. Chan

Re: ed package

2002-02-03 Thread utsl
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 09:02:57PM +, Matthew Vernon wrote: > "Jeremy C. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > getopt is in libiberty. It's also in glibc, and people have a bad > > > habit of not checking for that in configure. I'm

Re: ed package

2002-02-03 Thread Matthew Vernon
"Jeremy C. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > getopt is in libiberty. It's also in glibc, and people have a bad > > habit of not checking for that in configure. I'm thinking about > > packaging libiberty, and > > Also a BSD-licensed getopt (a

patches

2002-02-03 Thread utsl
Ok, here are patches for sysvinit and fakeroot. Fakeroot I've actually been able to test, and it appears to work. sysvinit is waiting on me to finish making my new (cleaner) chroot, and put on another box, so I can try booting. ---Nathan diff -urN fakeroot-0.4.5/communicate.h fakeroot-0.4.

Re: thoughts on architectures

2002-02-03 Thread utsl
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 05:59:28PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote: > Markus Brinkmanm (of HURD fame) has written this > http://master.debian.org/~brinkmd/arch-handling.txt > which is mandatory reading for us. You're right, that's a very good document. He's apparently been thinking along similar li

Re: Revised TODO

2002-02-03 Thread utsl
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 10:48:49AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote: > > Anything else need adding/updating? > > Packaging tool for the BSD kernel, kernel-tools, and libc. I'm working on a package to do this for FreeBSD. At the moment, it works great when I build it on FreeBSD, and I'm still trying to get

Re: Revised TODO

2002-02-03 Thread utsl
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 03:42:31PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote: > This is what we have on the website: > > any of the libs in /lib or /usr/lib that aren't currently packaged need to > be > > (still needs doing) > > base-passwd is desperately unhappy > > (seems happy now) FYI, there is a bug t

Re: Revised TODO

2002-02-03 Thread Joel Baker
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 03:42:31PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote: > This is what we have on the website: > > any of the libs in /lib or /usr/lib that aren't currently packaged need to > be > > (still needs doing) > > base-passwd is desperately unhappy > > (seems happy now) > > equivilents of co

thoughts on architectures

2002-02-03 Thread Andreas Schuldei
Markus Brinkmanm (of HURD fame) has written this http://master.debian.org/~brinkmd/arch-handling.txt which is mandatory reading for us. they (the hurd people) are very interested in working closely together with us, simply since we together might have enough weight to make debian make more archit

Revised TODO

2002-02-03 Thread Matthew Garrett
This is what we have on the website: any of the libs in /lib or /usr/lib that aren't currently packaged need to be (still needs doing) base-passwd is desperately unhappy (seems happy now) equivilents of console-tools/data need to be produced (still needs doing) netbase needs to be rebuilt. T

Re: apt

2002-02-03 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Sun, Feb 03, 2002 at 12:23:43AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I had problems with ftp-archive also. At different points, with different > versions, and different versions of g++, it has segfaulted, failed to compile, > and just plain won't work. I disabled it in the Makefile. I haven't trie