> I think he was talking about building cross-compilers on the m68k platform,
> not
> about cross-compilers to generate m68k binaries.
Yes, I understood the same. I do use binutils-m68k on i686 and find it
convenient but I also agree that building cross-binutils for all archs
on all archs (even t
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Meelis Roos wrote:
> CCC> If there are any objections, please feel free to email me. I don't plan
> CCC> on keeping them buried forever...only until a better way is found to
> CCC> generate them in a policy-compliant manner and also in manner that
> CCC> won't impact slower/ol
CCC> If there are any objections, please feel free to email me. I don't plan
CCC> on keeping them buried forever...only until a better way is found to
CCC> generate them in a policy-compliant manner and also in manner that
CCC> won't impact slower/older architectures like m68k quite as much
I
3 matches
Mail list logo
