Re: Is it _really_ dead?

2000-10-14 Thread Steve Price
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 04:02:55PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: # # I still think that a system that provided the stability # of a BSD kernel with the rest Debian would be the winner for a # network service OS. Also that it is not going to get done unless # and until 3 or 4

Re: Is it _really_ dead?

2000-10-14 Thread Gary Kline
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 02:24:15PM -0400, Nathan Hawkins wrote: [[ ... ]] > > Basically, it's a public relations issue. Such things are becoming more > critical to free software every day. I think the whole KDE/Qt mess proved > that: > Trollsoft ultimately changed their license because

Re: Is it _really_ dead?

2000-10-14 Thread Richard Tibbetts
On 10/14 Nathan Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The biggest problem was that no more than two or three people ever > really did anything. Everyone else sat around and flamed each other. > Some people joined the list for the sole purpose of flaming everyone > else on it, and trying to convince

Re: Is it _really_ dead?

2000-10-14 Thread Nathan Hawkins
The biggest problem was that no more than two or three people ever really did anything. Everyone else sat around and flamed each other. Some people joined the list for the sole purpose of flaming everyone else on it, and trying to convince them not to sully the perfection of BSD, or Debian. One of

Is it _really_ dead?

2000-10-14 Thread Wartan Hachaturow
Hello, people.   Can someone like Piotr say what's really going on with the project? Is it really dead, or what? And what can we do to get it up? If the current state is a follow to the multiple flames in -devel -- than it's better to ignore them ;) Once we can do something really meaningful,