Clint Adams writes:
> It sounds like you'd be perfectly happy with dpkg and apt
> ported to FreeBSD and a bunch of non-base packages ported.
Why bother porting non-base packages, since FreeBSD has linux
emulation mode?
It seems to me that dpkg and apt are not compatible with BSD
ports. What de
> We are mostly trying to create a better package system for FreeBSD in
> combination with the other good aspects of Debian. If I seem to recall
> the discussion at the beginn correctly.
What are "the other good aspects"?
> Well, I think we should leave the BSD libraries where they are and use
>
On 99-10-26 Clint Adams wrote:
> > Nice to hear. So what are now the important things to work on? I think
> > we should try to revitalize the work on this port.
> Well, firstly, I'm not what we're trying to create here. Are we
> doing Debian with a Free/Open/NetBSD kernel?
We are mostly trying t
> Nice to hear. So what are now the important things to work on? I think
> we should try to revitalize the work on this port.
Well, firstly, I'm not what we're trying to create here. Are we
doing Debian with a Free/Open/NetBSD kernel?
If so, we need to identify any conflicts with the base system
According to Christian Kurz:
> On 99-10-25 Clint Adams wrote:
> > > So how much of the basic decisions have been made on Debian/BSD?
> > > Is there a project leader, any plans? Has anybody looked at how
> > > difficult it will be to port dpkg to FreeBSD?
>
> > I briefly tried with FreeBSD 3.3 (199
On 99-10-25 Clint Adams wrote:
> > So how much of the basic decisions have been made on Debian/BSD?
> > Is there a project leader, any plans? Has anybody looked at how
> > difficult it will be to port dpkg to FreeBSD?
> I briefly tried with FreeBSD 3.3 (19991008-STABLE). Everything
> but md5sum a
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Daniel Podlejski wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 10:38:41AM -0700, Gary D. Kline wrote:
> [...]
> : BSD uses its ports system to install the source code and
> : build natively; while Linux seems to install the binaries
> : and docs only. Why not offer the user b
On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 10:38:41AM -0700, Gary D. Kline wrote:
[...]
: BSD uses its ports system to install the source code and
: build natively; while Linux seems to install the binaries
: and docs only. Why not offer the user both?
Debian have something like BSD ports - Debia
> BSD uses its ports system to install the source code and
> build natively; while Linux seems to install the binaries
> and docs only. Why not offer the user both?
apt-get source -b is the Debian equivalent to the ports tree.
> How to integrate current system of BSD ports with Debian's sources?
Err.. why would you do that?
On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 07:18:52PM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Gary D. Kline wrote:
> >
> > > Mmm, almost biting my tongue since I figured this project
> > > was door-nail dead. Yes, some of us on the FreeBSD side
>
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Gary D. Kline wrote:
>
> > Mmm, almost biting my tongue since I figured this project
> > was door-nail dead. Yes, some of us on the FreeBSD side
> > have looked at dpkg; it may well already have been done.
> >
> >
On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Gary D. Kline wrote:
> Mmm, almost biting my tongue since I figured this project
> was door-nail dead. Yes, some of us on the FreeBSD side
> have looked at dpkg; it may well already have been done.
>
> Some months ago I got around 35% finished in port
On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Christian Kurz wrote:
> On 99-10-25 Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> > I'd like to ask about progres in work on Debian/BSD.
> > Maybe could I find some webpage about this project?
>
> Well, I have now a FreeBSD-PC at home, so how much has be done on
> porting dpkg to FreeBSD? Maybe
14 matches
Mail list logo
