Le mercredi 18 avril à 14h 40mn 35s (+0900), Hideki Yamane a écrit :
> control: tags -1 +pending
>
> On Sat, 27 May 2017 11:27:06 +0200 jhcha54008 wrote:
> > I am testing the updated ([1],[2]) version attached of a
> > debootstrap script to accomodate the peculiarities of n
Le mercredi 18 avril à 14h 40mn 35s (+0900), Hideki Yamane a écrit :
> control: tags -1 +pending
>
> On Sat, 27 May 2017 11:27:06 +0200 jhcha54008 wrote:
> > I am testing the updated ([1],[2]) version attached of a
> > debootstrap script to accomodate the peculiarities of n
Hi,
Thank you for your message and your help to improve the
patch towards the quality standard of Debian.
There are still some questions left on the best way to
package a debian-port support in debootstrap.
Le vendredi 20 avril à 00h 16mn 13s (+0200), Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> On Wed, 18 Apr
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.97
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
It seems that using the variable DEBOOTSTRAP_DIR may result in some strange
behavior. (/usr/sbin/debootstrap gives an unconditionnal priority to
DEBOOTSTRAP_DIR if set, and /usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/sid not)
Hi,
The variable DEBOOTSTRAP_DIR may contain some white spaces
if the option --second-stage-target is given. $DEBOOTSTRAP_DIR
may be surrounded with quotes in second stage too.
I hope it will help !
Regards,
JH Chatenet
diff -Naur a/debootstrap b/debootstrap
--- a/debootstrap 2018-04-17 0
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.101
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainer,
The latest versions of debootstrap may fail on debian stretch if arch-test is
installed.
arch-test version 0.7-1 in stretch doesn't support option -c in use in
debootstrap (>= 1.0.97)
# debootstrap stable mychroot
E: Unable
Control: reopen 897379
Hi,
Unfortunately, the patch broke one (admittedly unusual) use case (debootstrap
is not installed as a deb package
on the system) :
# DEBOOTSTRAP_DIR=debootstrap-1.0.101/ debootstrap-1.0.101/debootstrap
--foreign sid mychroot-101
[ ... ]
I: Extracting zlib1g...
# echo $
Package: choose-mirror
Version: 2.96
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
Crossbuilding choose-mirror with dpkg-buildpackage -a results in an error
at the present time.
It succeeds with the patch below.
Thank you for your work on the debian installer !
Regards,
JH Chatenet
dif
Le samedi 19 janvier à 07h 48mn 18s (+0100), Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> Hi JH,
>
> jhcha54008 (2019-01-17):
> > Package: choose-mirror
> > Version: 2.96
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Tags: patch
> >
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
> > Crossbuil
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20190118
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-CC: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ,
debian-al...@lists.debian.org, debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
- The debian installer currently downloads udebs
from the buster/testing suite - which doesn't exi
Le vendredi 25 janvier à 12h 46mn 02s (+0100), John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a
écrit :
> On 1/24/19 4:53 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > I just never bothered tracking down the problem since I just used the
> > standard
> > installer. If your particular changes makes the installer work on De
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20190118
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
It would be handy to cross-compile the
debian-installer on amd64 for other architectures.
The patch below aims to suppress some errors
related to build-dependency check and to
packages of a foreign archit
Hi again,
The proposed patch is not arch-specific.
I tested only for alpha so far - with a
python 3 script 'netabootwrap.py' (attached)
to assemble the netboot image : the build
dependency 'aboot' for alpha is not usable
on amd64. The build dependency check needs to
be switched off altogether
X-Debbugs-CC: Samuel Thibault
Hi,
This looks like bug #879151 in apt-setup - or rather like
a regression caused by a leftover of a previous attempt
to solve it.
Would the patch of [1] be of any help - if some support of
debian-ports architectures in apt-setup is still wanted ?
I hope it wil
Hi again,
It seems that components are duplicated when using option --extra-suite in
debootstrap.
I got the following /etc/apt/sources.list (note the 'main' component repeated
twice or four times)
--8<--/etc/apt/sources.list---8<--
deb http://deb.debi
Le vendredi 20 avril à 00h 16mn 13s (+0200), Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
>
> IMO the special casing for ports.debian.org architectures should be
> handled in a dedicated wrapper. And maybe debootstrap needs new features
> to make this wrapper possible.
>
Hi,
It would be beneficial to add a new op
Hi,
Thank you for your work to improve the installability of port architectures !
Sorry for jumping so late into the discussion of the patch of bug #964248.
I wonder if the versioned dependency of apt-mirror-setting on base-installer
is necessary. Bug #879130 was solved (thank you !), and since
X-Debbug-CC: Samuel Thibault , наб
Hi,
In the present state of debian-installer apt-mirror-setup
creates some non functional entries in /etc/apt/sources.list
when installing on an architecture from the Debian-Ports repository.
Here are the three last lines in my /etc/apt/sources.list :
deb-sr
ctures.
Regards,
JH Chatenet
Le mardi 28 juillet à 12h 51mn 41s (+0200), jhcha54008 a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> In the present state of debian-installer apt-mirror-setup
> creates some non functional entries in /etc/apt/sources.list
> when installing on an architecture from the Debian-Ports
Hi,
Le jeudi 30 juillet à 13h 29mn 40s (+0200), наб a écrit :
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:44:33AM +0200, jhcha54008 wrote:
> > - log "Debian-Ports architecture detected"
> Why is this line removed from the log now?
Oops, you are right,
Hi,
Here is a patch proposal for this bug report. It aims :
- to be compatible with the install CD produced by debian-cd
- to avoid hard-coding a list of architectures in the Debian-Ports repository
- to make the use of the 'unreleased' distribution switchable.
I hope it will help to find a suita
Hi,
Here is an updated patch proposal. It is supposed that the
relevant parts [2] of the patch proposal [1] for
bug #964248 are applied.
I hope it will help to find a solution.
Regards,
JH Chatenet
[1] : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964248#52
[2] : Here is an excerpt of t
X-Debbugs-CC: Samuel Thibault
Hi,
here is a revised proposal of a patch for this bug report.
It is supposed that the relevant part [2] of the patch proposal [1]
for bug #964248 is applied.
I hope it will help to find a solution.
Regards,
JH Chatenet
[1] : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug
Le vendredi 31 juillet à 13h 15mn 58s (+0200), Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> наб, le ven. 31 juil. 2020 12:50:45 +0200, a ecrit:
> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:00:26PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > jhcha54008, le mar. 28 juil. 2020 10:39:40 +0200, a ecrit:
> > >
Le dimanche 2 août à 00h 13mn 59s (+0200), John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> On 8/2/20 12:16 AM, jhcha54008 wrote:
> >>> + is_ports_architecture=$(cat /usr/lib/choose-mirror/port_architecture)
> >> Is there any good reason for this to be a subshell ins
Hi,
In some circumstances, debootstrap may fail to download
'Packages' files if the option --extra-suite=unreleased is
in use (it doesn't happen with the debian-ports mirrors
but with custom mirrors). It seems that it is caused by
a forgotten 'local' declaration in the patch merged.
In the detail
Le lundi 17 août à 00h 38mn 15s (+0200), John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> Hi!
>
> This seems to have broken debian-installer on Debian Ports.
>
> Installing the base system now fails with:
>
> Aug 16 22:34:35 debootstrap: /usr/sbin/debootstrap --components=main
> --debian-installer --resol
Le lundi 17 août à 00h 55mn 08s (+0200), John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> What happens when a port does not have any packages in "unreleased"?
>
> ... to dicuss first whether enabling "unreleased" unconditionally will work
> even if a port doesn't have any package in this suite.
Hi again,
I
Le lundi 17 août à 01h 06mn 05s (+0200), Samuel Thibault a écrit :
>
> My debian-cd changes create empty files so that d-i is happy (exactly
> like is done for -backports).
>
Hi again,
I am just curious : what are the expected benefits
of an 'unreleased' distribution on install cdrom ?
Regard
Le lundi 17 août à 10h 17mn 24s (+0200), John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
>
> ... I don't quite understand why "unreleased" is supposed to be part of the
> base installation. "unreleased" is not a regular package archive and all
> packages in there are usually only added temporarily.
>
> Does
Hi,
Thank you for your answer.
Le mercredi 19 août à 19h 06mn 39s (+0200), Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> jhcha54008, le mer. 19 août 2020 19:04:30 +0200, a ecrit:
> > Le lundi 17 août à 01h 06mn 05s (+0200), Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> > > My debian-cd changes create empty fi
Hi,
May I ask if the workaround
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763391#15
helps ?
Regards,
JH Chatenet
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.
Hi,
bug # 774752 looks similar.
Should it be merged with this bug ?
Regards,
JH Chatenet
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150515185544.GB2941@debirf
Le samedi 16 mai à 21h 39mn 13s (+0200), Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> jhcha54008 (2015-01-08):
> > Hi,
> >
> > Would the following patch help ?
> >
> > Regards,
> > JH Chatenet
> >
> > diff -Naur a/usr/sbin/debootstrap b/usr/sb
Hi,
chfn doesn't only give an error in a fakechroot environment, but passwd -
and possibly every PAM invocation - too. The culprit seems to be libaudit1
linked to libpam. I was mistaken blaming a setuid executable.
The symptoms : chfn outputs an error line
chfn: PAM: System error
and there is no
Hi,
Moving setup_devices at the end of first_stage()
would solve partially #741964
(debootstrap: --variant=fakechroot and --foreign)
too.
Regards,
JH Chatenet
Hi,
It seems that setup_devices() was called previously from the end
of first_stage(). It was moved then to the beginning of second_stage()
to solve #498731 and #531316
(see commit d3518b9c7e4f693562d99ec4c15bb009b456603b of debootstrap
version 1.0.34)
As far as I understand, the aim was to cros
Hi,
May the following patch help ?
Thanks for your comments !
Regards,
JH Chatenet
diff -Naur a/usr/sbin/debootstrap b/usr/sbin/debootstrap
--- a/usr/sbin/debootstrap 2014-02-26 20:31:23.0 +0100
+++ b/usr/sbin/debootstrap 2014-02-26 20:32:31.0 +0100
@@ -656,6 +656,7 @@
Hi,
Would the following patch suffice ?
Thanks for your comments or corrections !
Regards,
JH Chatenet
diff -Naur a/usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/sid
b/usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/sid
--- a/usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/sid 2014-03-13 20:30:32.0 +0100
+++ b/usr/share/debootstrap/scri
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.59
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
Using option foreign with the variant fakechroot fails at the second stage with
an error :
$ fakechroot fakeroot -s .fakeroot.state debootstrap --variant=fakechroot
--foreign jessie my_chroot
$ fakechroot fakeroot
Hi,
It seems that the new version 2.19-3 of fakechroot solved this bug.
$ dpkg -l dbus libdbus-1-3 fakeroot fakechroot debootstrap
||/ Name VersionArchitecture
Description
+++-==-==-==
Hi,
I am testing the updated ([1],[2]) version attached of a
debootstrap script to accomodate the peculiarities of non
released port architectures from www.debian-ports.org :
- the keyring is debian-ports-archive-keyring (instead of
debian-archive-keyring). This keyring package is
scheduled for
Hi,
Here is an updated patch for debootstrap 1.0.78+nmu1.
Regards,
JH Chatenet
diff -Naur a/usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/sid
b/usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/sid
--- a/usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/sid
+++ b/usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/sid
@@ -72,6 +72,10 @@
}
x_feign_instal
Hi,
this looks like bug #742070
me@localhost:~$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/home/me/mychroot/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu"
fakechroot fakeroot -s .fakeroot.state debootstrap --variant=fakechroot
--include=dbus sid mychroot
[...]
I: Base system installed successfully.
me@localhost:~$ echo $?
0
I get the same pos
Hi,
May this be related to bug #732255 ?
Regards,
JH Chatenet
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141230120629.GA2400@debirf-dominicain
(+0100), Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> jhcha54008 (2014-12-30):
> > Hi,
> >
> > May this be related to bug #732255 ?
>
> (Adding back everyone to the loop.)
>
> Back to your suggestion in
> <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732255#10>:
>
Hi,
May this be bugs #745082 and #763391 ?
Perhaps the workaround at the end of #763391 would work.
Regards,
JH Chatenet
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian
Hi,
Would the following patch help ?
Regards,
JH Chatenet
diff -Naur a/usr/sbin/debootstrap b/usr/sbin/debootstrap
--- a/usr/sbin/debootstrap 2015-01-07 23:34:30.439150608 +
+++ b/usr/sbin/debootstrap 2015-01-07 23:54:08.037001814 +
@@ -590,6 +590,8 @@
if [ "$ba
Le vendredi 20 février à 19h 02mn 31s (+0100), John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a
écrit :
> Hi!
>
> I am running into the exact same problem when trying to create a
> unstable chroot using debootstrap on one of our sh4 machines
> using the following command line:
>
> debootstrap --no-check-gpg --includ
t out again
> in the future :P
>
> On Fri 2015-02-20 18:24:18 -0500, jhcha54008 wrote:
> > May I ask if debootstrap ran in a fakechroot environment or as real root ?
>
> I'm curious about this too. Adrian, can you give more details?
>
> --dkg
Hi,
I agree th
Le samedi 21 février à 03h 50mn 23s (+0100), John Paul Adrian Glaubitz a écrit :
> On 02/21/2015 12:24 AM, jhcha54008 wrote:
> > May I ask if debootstrap ran in a fakechroot environment or as real root ?
>
> I haven't tried fakechroot, but the debootstrap call was done using
Dear Maintainer,
Here is an updated script for debootstrap version 1.0.52.
Regards,
JH Chatenet
# /usr/share/debootstrap/scripts/debian-ports
SUITE="unstable"
DEF_MIRROR="http://ftp.debian-ports.org/debian";
mirror_style release
download_style apt
finddebs_style from-indices
variants - buildd
Package: choose-mirror
Version: 2.82
Severity: whishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-CC: "Helge Deller" , "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz"
, "James Clarke"
Dear Maintainer,
The following is a reformulation of a previous bug
report by Helge Deller [1].
The mirror list for non released architectures is emp
Package: net-retriever
Version: 1.44
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-CC: "Helge Deller" , "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz"
, "James Clarke"
Dear Maintainer,
net-retriever pulls udeb packages from one sole suite
(the one registered in mirror/udeb/suite).
Non released architectures from www.
Package: base-installer
Version: 1.171
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-CC: "Helge Deller" , "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz"
, "James Clarke"
Dear Maintainer,
bootstrap-base installs a kernel and some extra packages as its last
steps ('install_kernel' and 'install_extra').
The patch below
Package: apt-mirror-setup
Version: 0.129
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-CC: "Helge Deller" , "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz"
, "James Clarke"
Dear Maintainer,
apt-mirror-setup currently doesn't create an entry for the
'unreleased' distribution in the file /etc/apt/sources.list
on non rele
Package: libdebian-installer4-udeb
Version: 0.110
Control: affects -1 = anna
Dear Maintainer,
libdebian-installer currently fails when parsing 'Packages' files with
multiple versions of some packages. It results in anna trying to
configure these packages several times and a fatal error.
This err
Hi,
I realized that bug #885866 just submitted is a duplicate
of #562398 and #801161 - and a special case of #345408
and #345419 (and #389430).
Perhaps it should be merged with #562398 and #801161.
The behavior of anna and the underlying cause in libdebian-installer
were described in details in
y to 'unstable' because they FTBFS -
modified versions were uploded to 'unreleased'.
Bonne fin d'année à tous !
Regards,
JH Chatenet
Le vendredi 20 octobre à 11h 32mn 29s (+0200), Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> jhcha54008 (2017-10-19):
> > net-ret
Hi,
Just to summarize what I have found about backports support in debian
installer (did I miss something important ?) :
As you pointed out previously, it may be useful to build netboot images
of the debian installer with a newer kernel - and even some newer udebs
from backports.
May I ask if yo
Hi again,
As an illustration of downloading from backports with the rule :
'install the newest version'
here is the source of an (unofficial) udeb : di-sort-packages
It contains a small utility (di_sort_packages) to sort a
'Packages' file by ascending version, and optionally keep
only the newest
Hi again,
I tested (once) in qemu emulation on amd64 two netboot images
built with stretch-backports and the two patches [1] and [2] below (and
#885866 which shouldn't be necessary). The installation
finished successfully (however, it doesn't install automatically
the kernel from stretch-backport
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.42
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
I wonder if we could have debootstrap support the repository
ftp.debian-ports.org.
Please find the script attached as an illustration of the requested
features, in the form of a script
/usr/share/debootstrap/scr
63 matches
Mail list logo
