Bug#65599: Problem with update-alternatives

2000-06-13 Thread Tim Hull
Package: base Version: 2.2.15-06-07 In the /etc/alternatives directory, there is a file that says to use the update-alternatives command to change alternative programs. There is a manpage, but no update-alternatives command. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "uns

Bug#65606: No installation of LILO to logical partition?

2000-06-13 Thread Tim Hull
Package: base Version: 2.2.15-06-07 When I installed Debian "potato" I was not allowed to install LILO to a logical partition. It says LILO can't be installed there, but in fact it can. I reconfigured LILO after install to lie in the logical partition ,and it worked. This may or may not work

Bug#437018: Network shouldn't be used/enforced on non-network installs

2007-08-09 Thread Tim Hull
Package: debian-installer Version: 20070308 Priority: wishlist During installs from CD-ROM and DVD media, users are still currently prompted to set up the network and download security fixes from the network. However, many (quite possibly most) users who use the full-blown install media (as oppos

Bug#437013: d-i doesn't properly understand LVM groups with active snapshot volumes

2007-08-09 Thread Tim Hull
Package: debian-installer Version: 20070308 I recently used d-i to install Debian Etch to a volume that was part of an LVM volume group that contained an active snapshot volume. While the installation proceeded fine, it issued an error message to the effect that something was wrong with the parti

Bug#437016: d-i inconsistent in definition of GB used

2007-08-09 Thread Tim Hull
Package: debian-installer Version: 20070308 During an Etch install, the partitioning step is inconsistent about the definition of a gigabyte. For example, when LVM volumes are created, the definition of GB used for specifying their size is (1024*1024*1024) bytes. However, the definition of GB use

Bug#437018: Network shouldn't be used/enforced on non-network installs

2007-08-09 Thread Tim Hull
I guess having it look for a network in the background and silently fail would be preferable, in any case. Is this doable? On 8/10/07, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Quoting Tim Hull ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > It would be GREAT if the network-related s

Bug#437018: Network shouldn't be used/enforced on non-network installs

2007-08-10 Thread Tim Hull
> > > Of course security updates should be enabled by default, and I do agree > that it's sensible for the system to _ask_ to try to install security > updates even if there's no network. But there are cases where security > updates don't make much sense, and I do think that the current behaviour >

Bug#437013: d-i doesn't properly understand LVM groups with active snapshot volumes

2007-08-10 Thread Tim Hull
The message states: Unable to determine geometry of file/device. You should not use Parted unless you REALLY know what you're doing! The log is attached... On 8/10/07, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Tim Hull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: &

Bug#437018: closed by Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#437018: Network shouldn't be used/enforced on non-network installs)

2007-08-15 Thread Tim Hull
-- Forwarded message -- > From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:13:23 -0400 > Subject: Re: Bug#437018: Network shouldn't be used/enforced on non-network > installs > Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > ("there's no working connection to the