Bug#458965: [m68k] allow installation of etch-m68k

2008-01-03 Thread Stephen R Marenka
Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.7 Please apply this one line patch to allow etch-m68k to be installed. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Makefile.orig 2007-11-13 19:51:03.0 -0600 +++ Makefi

Re: partman support for m68k atari

2008-01-12 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 12:42:59AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > (CCing Stephen as I'm not sure if he's subscribed) I'm subscribed. > Recently you committed this change in r50759: > +partman-base (116) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > + > + [ Stephen R. Marenka ] &

Re: Call for Debian Installer testing, before D-I Beta1 release

2008-02-05 Thread Stephen R Marenka
so see if someone in the Debian m68k community > would be willing to build CD images using packages from unstable. What's the procedure for that? At the moment, sid is pretty broken for installation (we're far behind), but no reason not to start the process. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephe

Re: Call for Debian Installer testing, before D-I Beta1 release

2008-02-11 Thread Stephen R Marenka
e're not in as bad of shape as we thought. > I'm just curious how much RAM I would need to avoid the low-memory > mode, and if there's anything I'm missing because of that. It's not > like we could do a graphical install on m68k. We can barely get X > running a

Re: Call for Debian Installer testing, before D-I Beta1 release

2008-02-12 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 06:04:24PM -0800, Brad Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 01:29:33PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 04:27:56AM -0800, Brad Boyer wrote: > > > I did download and try to boot the m68k build of this installer. The > >

Re: Preparation to mass translation uploads, porters help needed

2008-02-13 Thread Stephen R Marenka
be checked with > me. We'll decide together if we do or not each upload. Would partman-base and partman-partitioning fall into this somewhere? Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Preparation to mass translation uploads, porters help needed

2008-02-13 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 02:32:11PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:54:39AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > > >> Tomorrow we need to mass upload packages that has translation >

Re: Debian Installer Lenny Beta2: Kernel update work

2008-02-15 Thread Stephen R Marenka
te/zlib_inflate.ko | some modules are in more than one package | command exited with status 1 Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Debian Installer Lenny Beta1: Status Update 1

2008-02-15 Thread Stephen R Marenka
Is there something I'm missing? Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Debian Installer Lenny Beta2: Kernel update work

2008-02-15 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 08:02:53PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:42:58PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > > >> Please porters, let's start the work for upgrading Debian Instal

Re: Debian Installer Lenny Beta1: Status Update 1

2008-02-15 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 09:47:04PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Friday 15 February 2008, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:33:05AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > > Following are the packages, architecture specific ones, that needs > > > uploa

Re: Subject: Debian Installer Lenny Beta1: Status Update 3

2008-02-27 Thread Stephen R Marenka
lt at all than having semi-official builds that deviate from all | other arches. Sorry. I'd rather hoped that having sid images would be better than no images at all. Maybe we'll have a lenny to build from one day. :) Peace, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Hold the upload until Beta1 test images

2008-03-01 Thread Stephen R Marenka
l free to upload the m68k binaries. I'm already happy with the way the packaging works for now (at least until I've tested it by using it). I'll go crawl back under my rock for now. :) Peace, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#474698: partman-base: Inconsistent output if sector size != 512 bytes

2008-04-22 Thread Stephen R Marenka
good start could be > >>> to > >>> check whether the Sarge installer also has the bug as that has older > >>> versions of libparted and partman-base. > >>> > >>> Otavio: you did that change; any comments? > >> > >> I&

Re: [D-I] mass kernel udeb update and preparations for RC1

2006-09-22 Thread Stephen R Marenka
possible now and is even required for > > partman-auto-crypto. > > If you would like to add support for it, please see [3]. Feel free > > to contact me or David Härdeman (Alphix) for help. > > > > * mips: keyboard issues > > We've had a report a

linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6 help

2006-11-28 Thread Stephen R Marenka
-m68k-2.6 | dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 0.79 | dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Stephen R. Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | dpkg-buildpackage: source version without epoch 0.79 | fakeroot debian/rules clean | kernel-wedge gen-control > debian/control | dh_testdir | dh_clean `fin

Re: linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6 help

2006-11-29 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 03:27:22PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Wednesday 29 November 2006 04:02, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > I was wondering if someone can help me out. I started to update > > linux-kernel-di-m68k-2.6 to 2.6.18 and I ran into the following error. > > I supp

m68k mklibs problem?

2007-06-01 Thread Stephen R Marenka
I fired up the latest daily for m68k and ran into the following problem. | /bin/sh: symbol lookup error: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined symbol: _rtld_global Is this a mklibs problem? Any ideas? Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it righ

Re: m68k mklibs problem?

2007-06-01 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 05:20:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Friday 01 June 2007 17:07, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > I fired up the latest daily for m68k and ran into the following > > problem. > > > > | /bin/sh: symbol lookup error: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined

Re: m68k mklibs problem?

2007-06-01 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 05:20:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Friday 01 June 2007 17:07, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > I fired up the latest daily for m68k and ran into the following > > problem. > > > > | /bin/sh: symbol lookup error: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined

Re: m68k mklibs problem?

2007-06-01 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:49:11PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 05:20:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > P.S. Could you also have a look at the space problem for the m68k floppy > > images? > > There seems to be a /usr/share/acorn directory,

Re: m68k mklibs problem?

2007-06-02 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 09:40:23AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 10:07:48AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > I fired up the latest daily for m68k and ran into the following problem. > > | /bin/sh: symbol lookup error: /lib/libc.so.6: undefined symbol: &

Re: m68k mklibs problem?

2007-06-02 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 11:01:00PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 10:10:14AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > No difference, see attached. > > Okay. Please show the same from libc.so.6. Please find attached. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka

Re: r47134 - trunk/installer/build/config/m68k

2007-06-04 Thread Stephen R Marenka
was sort of striving for a bit of that with my changes anyway. I sort of forgot about debian-cd, although I don't believe it's currently building anything for m68k. I hope to look at that soonish. Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: m68k mklibs problem?

2007-06-05 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 11:59:43PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 04:24:14PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > Please find attached. > > Yeah. > > | D *UND* _rtld_global > vs. > | DO *UN

Re: m68k mklibs problem?

2007-06-05 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:29:49PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 07:24:11AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > Is there any workaround I can do to get this working again? > > No idea. A not uptodate build environment? Are you saying the symbol version

Re: m68k mklibs problem?

2007-06-06 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 02:59:37PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:29:49PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 07:24:11AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > Is there any workaround I can do to get this working again? >

Re: m68k mklibs problem?

2007-06-06 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 05:50:15PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:29:49PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 07:24:11AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > Is there any workaround I can do to get this working again? > > No id

Re: m68k mklibs problem?

2007-06-07 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 04:07:56AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 02:49:37PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > Please show objdump -p /lib/libc.so.6. > [...] > > NEEDED ld.so.1 > [...] > > And mklibs-readelf -n /lib/libc.so.6. $ mk

Re: m68k mklibs problem?

2007-06-14 Thread Stephen R Marenka
The _rtld_global problem is confirmed fixed for m68k. Thanks! Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [RFC] Dropping architectures alpha and m68k from the Installation Guide

2009-10-14 Thread Stephen R Marenka
t's unlikely to happen. Indeed. > Opinions, comments and suggestions welcome. No objections. Peace, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of &

Re: Lowering down my involvment in D-I

2009-12-06 Thread Stephen R Marenka
energy you've put into d-i. > I sincerely hope that, at some time, new energies will show up in D-I > development. We desperately need it. It seems like that's always the case. :) Peace, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right

Re: The future of the D-I team

2009-03-01 Thread Stephen R Marenka
months. The only arches for which there is any real excuse for this are FWIW: m68k still builds too [1]. [1] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/m68k/images/daily/ Peace, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: The future of the D-I team

2009-03-02 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 06:43:03AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Stephen R Marenka (step...@marenka.net): > > > FWIW: m68k still builds too [1]. > > > > [1] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/m68k/images/daily/ > > > Hmmm, I can't check ri

Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading

2009-06-15 Thread Stephen R Marenka
f much concern to d-i development anymore these days. > > Yes I agree that we shouldn't worry too much about it but if we can keep > it in sync with rest it is better and makes porter's life easier too. I can upload it if that would make life easier. :) Peace, Stephen -- Stephen R

Re: [RFC] Packages that looks ready for uploading

2009-06-18 Thread Stephen R Marenka
ive > > would reject because it doesn't know about m68k? > > Yes, indeed. We can upload to debian-ports, but not to the main archive > (which is why I suggested not to worry about it ;) Argh! I forgot about that. Also uploading source to d-ports is only allowed for unreleased not

m68k/atari: new atari-bootstrap and daily d-i builds

2004-12-31 Thread Stephen R Marenka
are also being built with the new atari- bootstrap for your testing pleasure. [1] <http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/d-i/images-m68k/daily/> Thanks, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: D-I Etch Beta2 - Status update (2)

2006-02-27 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:46:21PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > Today the 20060218 builds have been installed for all arches, so tomorrow Technically still not true, as the m68k build continues to sit in byhand. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it r

Re: D-I Etch Beta2 - Status update (2)

2006-02-27 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 03:29:38PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 27 February 2006 14:39, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 11:46:21PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > > Today the 20060218 builds have been installed for all arches, so > > > tomorrow &g

d-i beta2 other images

2006-03-16 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On the d-i homepage, the link to other images under beta 2 points to ftp.debian.org, which is either currently broken or at least doesn't have m68k (or much else) any more. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sign

Bug#360074: installation-report: ipw2200 wireless driver badconfigured

2006-03-31 Thread Stephen R Marenka
dhcp wireless-essid MY_ESSID wireless-mode Managed wireless-key MY_HEX_KEY If you're using resolvconf, you'll also need entries like dns-nameservers and dns-search. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature

<    1   2   3   4