Hi all,
I usually install using a netinst image, which I find here:
https://www.debian.org/CD/netinst/
I figured I should verify the checksum and signature, though, and looked
at this page:
https://www.debian.org/CD/verify
That tells me there should be signed checksum files alongside the image
On 2/11/19 4:04 AM, john doe wrote:
> On 11/1/2019 2:13 PM, Richard Hector wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I usually install using a netinst image, which I find here:
>>
>> https://www.debian.org/CD/netinst/
>>
>> I figured I should verify the checksum and
On 2/11/19 6:56 PM, Richard Hector wrote:
> On 2/11/19 4:04 AM, john doe wrote:
>> On 11/1/2019 2:13 PM, Richard Hector wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I usually install using a netinst image, which I find here:
>>>
>>> https://www.debian.org/CD/n
Hi - I hope I'm in the right place; feel free to redirect me.
I want to install on a KVM-based VPS, using an ordinary installer (ie
not using the image provided).
I used the provider's method to provide an ISO, and supplied the
standard amd64 netinst image - it boots fine, but can't find the 'cdr
On 11/08/18 22:43, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2018-08-11 at 20:14 +1200, Richard Hector wrote:
>> Hi - I hope I'm in the right place; feel free to redirect me.
>>
>> I want to install on a KVM-based VPS, using an ordinary installer (ie
>> not using the i
On 12/08/18 00:16, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2018-08-11 at 22:58 +1200, Richard Hector wrote:
> [...]
>> I'm mostly familiar with the netinst image, and it's what I generally
>> use to install on real hardware.
>>
>> I'm less familiar with netb
On 12/08/18 11:20, Jose R R wrote:
> UpCloud provide a similar interface to Virt-Manager when installing
> your own OS. They address the issue being discussed here -- by
> describing 'a trick' to install your own OS:
Thanks Jose - I don't think this method is applicable to my
situation/provider, h
On 12/08/18 01:37, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-08-12 at 00:25 +1200, Richard Hector wrote:
>> On 12/08/18 00:16, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2018-08-11 at 22:58 +1200, Richard Hector wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>> I'm mostly familiar with the netin
On 18/10/18 3:54 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: grub-installer
> Version: 1.157
>
> Please remove grub-legacy support. I intend to request removal pretty
> soon as it does not longer work.
>
> Bastian
Hi Bastian - do you mean you intend to request removal of grub-legacy
from debian?
I don
Hi all,
I've just done most of an installation on a BIOS machine, with a pair of
new 4TB disks, which require GPT.
Grub fails to install, which I possibly should have predicted - though I
thought di might have either coped or warned me.
It seems I need a BIOS boot partition, and that it should f
On 11/01/19 6:52 AM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:04:16PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've just done most of an installation on a BIOS machine, with a pair of
>> new 4TB disks, which require GPT.
>>
>> Grub fa
On 11/01/19 2:31 PM, Richard Hector wrote:
> Incidentally, could/should I have made that RAID1? I created bios
> partitions on both my disks, and have grub-install-ed to both. The
> partitions do seem to be identical.
I should clarify - I have 4 partitions on each drive:
bios
raid: /
On 12/01/19 3:44 AM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 02:31:22PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
>> That worked great, thanks. Though it seems the '1.0MB' free before my
>> first partition wasn't big enough (or not aligned right?) so I had to
>> st
On 19/01/19 5:27 PM, Wookey wrote:
> This problem doesn't arise on x86 where there is 'always' a screen (or
> some BIOs magic to reflect what would be on the screen to serial).
Is that true? I'm sure the Soekris box I've got (in storage)
(admittedly, probably not a supported cpu any more) only has
On 3/02/21 7:02 am, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Hi Steve!
On 2/2/21 6:53 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
It appears that the latest version of xfsprogs (5.10.0) has just grown
a dependency on libinih, and there isn't a udeb version of libinih to
meet that dependency. I'll file a bug now.
Might
Hi all,
I'm commenting here partly because I don't know which bit of software is
at fault for each problem ...
I have a PCEngines APU4, which has a serial port and no video hardware.
I'm using a USB-serial adapter, with a null-modem cable.
I'm using a Buster netinst USB stick - 10.1 I think
On 11/04/21 9:10 pm, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Geert Stappers, le dim. 11 avril 2021 10:55:28 +0200, a ecrit:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 08:57:38AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 11:51:57AM +1200, Richard Hector wrote:
> >
> > a serial port and no
On 11/04/21 9:26 pm, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Richard Hector, le dim. 11 avril 2021 21:18:49 +1200, a ecrit:
On 11/04/21 9:10 pm, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> $ git grep -i "Boot console" .
> en/boot-installer/parameters.xml: Boot console
> po/[...]
>
> That's very
On 12/04/21 4:38 am, Lou Poppler wrote:
On Sun, 2021-04-11 at 21:18 +1200, Richard Hector wrote:
I think so, yes. But my problems started earlier than booting linux, at
the SysLinux menu. Perhaps what's needed is more of an appendix for
dealing with serial consoles?
Anyway, I'll
On 12/04/21 1:48 pm, Richard Hector wrote:
I got the hang of the boot parameters, though that section doesn't
mention removing the 'vga=xxx' section from the linux command line. I'm
not sure if that's important; I'll have to retest to confirm.
I've checked
On 11/04/21 11:51 am, Richard Hector wrote:
Then finally, I can't remember how, I discovered that it didn't like
displaying on a 24-line terminal, which most of the terminals I tried
default to.
With a 25-line terminal, it all seems useable - and Minicom mostly
displays it ok too
On 11/04/21 10:15 pm, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 11:10:20AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Geert Stappers, le dim. 11 avril 2021 10:55:28 +0200, a ecrit:
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 08:57:38AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> >
> > On how to prevent that more people solve a solved
On 12/04/21 6:18 pm, Geert Stappers wrote:
Do we know the "path" that original poster is using?
Possible format for answer to this
- APU device
- 9-pin serial connector
- null-modem, cross connects everthing
- 9-pin serial connector
- USB-Serial-Adapter
- Linux computer
- XFCE de
On 13/04/21 12:31 pm, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 13:48 +1200, Richard Hector wrote:
On 11/04/21 9:26 pm, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Richard Hector, le dim. 11 avril 2021 21:18:49 +1200, a ecrit:
> > On 11/04/21 9:10 pm, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > $ git gre
Hi all,
Sorry for the minimal detail - hopefully someone else will understand
this much better than I do, and be able to fill in if required. Failing
that, I might be able to do better later. Just spent many more hours on
this than anticipated, and need sleep.
I installed bullseye on my HP P
On 26/07/21 5:42 pm, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 03:43:18AM +1200, Richard Hector wrote:
Hi all,
Sorry for the minimal detail - hopefully someone else will understand this
much better than I do, and be able to fill in if required. Failing that, I
might be able to do better
Hi,
Hopefully this is the right, or close enough, place ...
Given that EFI is common, should dosfstools now be a standard package,
so that we can fsck the partition when required?
Happy to file as a bug, if I know what to file it against.
Cheers,
Richard
On 23/08/20 8:17 pm, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Yes, the bug is still existing: the
> installer doesn't warn about installing 32bit on 64bit. But reporting
> a new bug report would leave the old one unseen. And it'd then be even
> less informative: with the new bug report only we would not remember
>
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Using netinst bullseye 11.4 installer:
https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/debian-11.4.0-amd64-netinst.iso
I chose to add a network mirror, using https, and the default
'deb.debian.org'.
I used (non-graphical)
On 23/07/22 18:07, Geert Stappers wrote:
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Why? Because there's a workaround? Is everyone expected to be able to
find that workaround?
https is an option provided in the installer, that apparently doesn't
work (at least with the netinst installer), and it's not i
On 23/07/22 23:01, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
As mentioned by Julien, getting the installer's syslog (compressed, to
make sure it reaches the mailing list) would help understand what's
going on.
Oh - uncompressed, it made it into the BTS, but not to the list. Here's
a compressed version.
Cheers
31 matches
Mail list logo
