the best tool for the job. I wrote squashfs to be better than
cramfs, because otherwise there's was little point in writing and
releasing it. As for its use for booting, I don't want you to mistake
this for an advert for squashfs. A couple of questions regarding
squashfs's r
e file data is likely
to be written likewise. Of course for cramfs and squashfs this is not
much of an issue because they're already compressed.
The order of files would make no difference if files are compressed
independently like squashfs does.
You're right.
Phillip Lougher:
I&#
Glenn McGrath wrote:
The comparisons to cramfs does favour squashfs for lowmem installs.
My only reservation is the fact that its not in the official kernel, but
it sounds like you intend to stick it out and maintain it outside the
offical tree, so that shouldnt be too much of a problem.
Yes. I
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 01:22:29PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 07:58:09PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > /sbin/mkswap is available in the busybox-cvs-udeb package. Should it
> > be available in the busybox-udeb package as well?
>
> The network install image runs out
4 matches
Mail list logo
