Bug#266702: Installation report: RC1

2004-08-18 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: <8/18/2004 RC1> uname -a: Linux Date: 8/18/2004 11:30 AM Method:

Bug#267059: Installation report: RC1

2004-08-20 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: <8/18/2004 RC1> uname -a: Linux Date: 8/18/2004 15:00 Method:

Bug#267059: Installation report: RC1

2004-08-20 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 20 August 2004 11:23, Christian Perrier wrote: > > ***PROBLEM: The new installation routine does not install development > > tools. > > I may be wrong, but IIRC tasksel still includes a "Development" > task.so you have this possibility wh

Bug#256067: Installation failure

2004-06-24 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: <06/24/2004 Sid Installation 386 / Current > uname -a: Date: <6/24/2004 15:00> Method: Machine: Processor: Pentium III Memory: 256 Mb Root Device: Root Size/partition table: Output of

Bug#256267: Installation failure

2004-06-25 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: <06/24/2004 Sid Installation 386 / Current > uname -a: Date: <6/25/2004 11:00> Method: Machine: Processor: Pentium III Memory: 256 Mb Root Device: Root Size/partition table: Output of l

Problem w/Beta 3 CD image

2004-03-16 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The only CD images that seem to be available for i386 are the Net install and businesscard. Is there going to be a CD install image posted? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAVziOjeziQOokQnARAn20AJ4l

Bug#238412: Installation report

2004-03-16 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 3/16/2004 http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta3/ (netinst.iso) uname -a: Date: <3/16/2004 15:26> Method: Booting from CD. Machine: Dell Inspiron 4000 Processor: Pentiu

Bug#241757: Installation Report

2004-04-02 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 03/21/04 uname -a: Date: 04/02/2004 Method:

Bug#272420: Debian Installer RC1 - Fails to configure network

2004-09-19 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: Debian NetInstall (same problem w/BusinessCard) Downloaded 9/19/2004 uname -a: Didn't get that far Date: 9/19/2004 15:00 Method:

Re: Bug#272420: Debian Installer RC1 - Fails to configure network

2004-09-19 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 19 September 2004 19:58, Joshua Kwan wrote: > On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 17:59:51 -0500, Michael Satterwhite wrote: > > The system has a 3Com 3C905C-TX network card, which is well supported by > > Linux. Apparently it isn't de

Bug#272420: Reaching possible test point

2004-09-24 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At this point, we've established that the Ethernet card in question is supported, just not detected by the installer. In addition, no one has suggested a way to configure the card manually during the Installation process. Ideally, the Installer sho

Bug#274714: Error: Cannot configure network

2004-10-03 Thread Michael Satterwhite
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: Latest daily build: 10/02/04 uname -a: Linux photon 2.4.27-1-386 #1 Fri Sept 3 06:24:46 UTC 2004 i686 unknown Date: 10/03/04 13:58 Method: CD Businesscard image Machine: Dell Dimension XPS B1000 Processor: Pentium III Memory: 512 Mb R

Bug#274714: /proc/bus/pci/devices

2004-10-05 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 05 October 2004 20:56, you wrote: > On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 10:38:30AM -0500, Michael Satterwhite wrote: > ad nauseum. The driver is convinced you don't have anything plugged in > to the card. Certainly it could be a drive

Bug#274714: /proc/bus/pci/devices

2004-10-06 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 05 October 2004 23:13, you wrote: > On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 10:26:44PM -0500, Michael Satterwhite wrote: > > 034010b792003c59x > > This is dandy. It's marked as a supported device in both the 2.4 and

Bug#274714: /proc/bus/pci/devices

2004-10-06 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 05 October 2004 23:13, you wrote: > On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 10:26:44PM -0500, Michael Satterwhite wrote: > > 034010b792003c59x > > This is dandy. It's marked as a supported device in both the 2.4 and

Bug#274714: /proc/bus/pci/devices

2004-10-07 Thread Michael Satterwhite
x27;ve bounced your two recent messages > to the bug address.] > > On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 07:27:03AM -0500, Michael Satterwhite wrote: > > I'll try that this morning. It *SHOULD* run under 2.4 - it is right now > > under SuSE. Of course, they may have configured their kernel