Bug#932258: console-setup-freebsd: missing dependency

Hello, Missatge de James Clarke del dia dc., 17 de jul. 2019 a les 8:25: > vidcontrol, and the rest of src:freebsd-utils, is available in unreleased, > since the source package only builds for kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386. > Avoiding this would require either getting the source package to bu

Bug#932258: console-setup-freebsd: missing dependency

Hello, > Missatge de James Clarke del dia dc., 17 de jul. > 2019 a les 8:25: > > vidcontrol, and the rest of src:freebsd-utils, is available in unreleased, > > since the source package only builds for kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386. > > Avoiding this would require either getting the source pac

Bug#1037186: debian-installer: bookworm d-i graphics are not shown on Raptor system

t point release. Thanks for your support. On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 12:29, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Hi, > > Hector Oron Martinez (2023-06-07): > > We found latest installer for bookworm is missing ast DRM kernel > > module, causing graphical failure on ppc64el Raptor mach

Bug#1037186: debian-installer: bookworm d-i graphics are not shown on Raptor system

Hello El mié, 7 jun 2023, 13:03, Cyril Brulebois escribió: > Hector Oron (2023-06-07): > > and Timonthy was able to test that. I could expand the change to ppc64 > > (be) and cdrom targets and test that. > > > > Note, the ppc64el installer images are unusable with t

RFC: dropping armel from Debian for the upcoming release

[ {debian-kernel,debian-boot,debian-release}@d.o are in Bcc so they can track follow up emails at debian-arm ML if interested. ] Dear fellow developers, Debian Installer no longer produces daily builds for this platform: - https://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/ Debian Linux kernel packages a

Re: armhf d-i switched to armmp only, no armhf daily builds happening? (Was: Re: Uploading linux (3.11.5-1))

Hello, 2013/10/20 Cyril Brulebois : > Ian Campbell (2013-10-19): [...] > I'm not sure about ancina, but at least hasse had disc issues. Not sure > what the status is, but the right contact would usually be $arch@buildd, > added. Thanks for heads-up! I'll have a look during this week. Cheers, --

Re: Proposed changes to installer for armhf

Hello, 2014-04-28 12:26 GMT+02:00 Ian Campbell : > On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 19:06 +0200, Karsten Merker wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 08:42:23AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: >> > Aside: "EfikaMX" is listed in 2.1.2.4 as no longer supported, but we do >> > supply a specific image for it using the a

Re: Updating the installation guide, arm platform support

Hello, 2014-03-20 19:26 GMT+01:00 Karsten Merker : [...] > This is the commit that has removed the code: > > commit c7c29b3aeb318b9efe3035cacf42800dfe2970f5 > Author: Matt Sealey > Date: Wed Aug 1 12:49:30 2012 -0500 > > ARM: efikamx: remove Genesi Efika MX platform files from the t

Bug#697675: debootstrap: please report package version-revision (patch)

Hello, On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:04:59AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hector Oron (08/01/2013): > > On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:02:19AM +0100, Hector Oron wrote: > > > When using debootstrap to create a given environment, it would > > > be nice to output vers

Bug#693839: debian-installer: kernel install fails on armel buffalo linkstation pro, missing uboot-mkimage

Hello, 2013/6/5 Cyril Brulebois : > Martin Michlmayr (04/06/2013): >> I just received several bug reports about this issue and decided to >> investigate. > Many thanks! +1 > Maybe we should also perform a .db check at build time, so that any > new such items would be spotted early? The follow

Bug#484769: Latest version of busybox on unstable or experimental

Package: busybox Version: 1:1.9.2-3 Severity: wishlist Hello, BusyBox 1.10.3 version corrects some bugs, which makes it more useful and it would help on our development. I would be happy to package it and doing some sponsored (via Wookey or codehelp) upload to experimental or unstable if you ar

Bug#415483: marked as done (install fails on thinkpad x60s)

Hello, I can report that Etch RC2 is doing very well on a Lenovo Thinkpad X60s I have used installgui -very nice- :-) And LVM doing also fine. Only wireless networking needs non-free firmware ipw3945, also tested fine. Regards, Hector Oron 2007/3/20, Debian Bug Tracking System <[EM

Re: debian-installer: kernel lagging for sh4, m68k, alpha

Hello, 2011/1/10 Thorsten Glaser : > Hector Oron dixit: > >>d-i/installer/doc/devel/kerntabl: >>arch       kernel udebs     build/config >>i386       2.6.32 (-27)     2.6.32-5 >>[...] >>alpha      2.6.30 (-6)      2.6.30-1 # unoficial >>m68k       2

Bug#549879: --variant=minbase is broken for squeeze

Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.20 Severity: normal Hello, I have just update and upgrade my system and this bug it is still shown in unstable. Kind Regards, -- Hector Oron -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'uns

Bug#549879: debootstrap: --variant=minbase is broken for squeeze

Hello again, It looks like gnupg and util-linux depend on dpkg (>= 1.15.4) which has not make its way to squeeze yet. Cheers -- Héctor Orón signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Yet another [cross] installer

Hello, Nowadays, the number of devices (non x86) is growing and growing. Lots of these devices have not upstream linux kernel support, which makes it a bit harder to maintain in the context of debian-installer. Also, afaict, debian-installer team does not like to add complexity to d-i, which I u

Bug#572365: anna: add cross compiling support

Package: anna Version: 1.34 Severity: wishlist Hello, I have written a mini-howto in wiki format to be able to cross compile anna package. Could you consider applying the following patch or if you update packing taking care of cross compiling bits? Thanks, = Example of cross compiling a pa

Bug#572369: hw-detect: add cross compiling support

Package: hw-detect Version: 1.76 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hello, Could you consider applying this patch for enable cross compiling support on this package? I would also like to comment that the following patch is against Makefile (respecting current packaging), but all this mangling I b

Bug#572431: busybox: add cross compilation support

Package: busybox Version: 1:1.14.2-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hello, Could you please consider the following patch to be able to cross compile busybox package? diff -urN busybox-1.15.3/debian/patches/cross-compiler.patch busybox-1.15.3.foo//debian/patches/cross-compiler.patch --- busyb

Bug#522234: debian-installer: Fails to boot on amd64 >4GB RAM

Package: debian-installer Version: 20090123 Severity: normal Hi, I am booting an amd64 host with PXE method, once i get to the first screen i press 'Install'.. Decompressing Linux... Parsing ELF... done. Booting the kernel. Aperture beyond 4G. Ignoring Your BIOS doesn't leave a aperture m

Re: ppc64 port

Hi Wart, I have been running ppc64 port from http://debian-ppc64.alioth.debian.org/ and it was fine when I tried it. > While digging through d-i, I've noticed some signs of ppc64 port > (which was, as far as I remember, a heroic attempt to make a 64-bit > userland Debian port). Actually it was

Re: ppc64 port

Hi, >> The only problem >> I had was trying to run IBM 64 bit SDK3.0 for CELL (from Barcelona's >> Supercomputing Center) on 32 bit Debian. > > There ain't much of 64-bit external depends in IBM SDK, since it > brings in most of the stuff. Off the top of my head I remember only > libnuma (beside

Make d-i capable to cross compile armel|* firmware images

Hi all, INTRO It's been a while since we[1] built our first cross compiler. Debian gcc package is able to produce compilers that spit your favorite arch code from your i386|amd64 host machine. There are many fields in Debian that could improve by the higher compilation speed obtained when cross

Re: Make d-i capable to cross compile armel|* firmware images

Hi, This was one of the release main goals and if nobody has something in favour of it, this goal should be dropped avoiding complexity grow in code and maintainability. Cheers -- Héctor Orón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr

Re: [PATCH] Add Freescale i.MX serial consoles, /dev/ttymxc*

Hi, 2011/6/20 Loïc Minier : > --- >  src/lib/debian-installer/detect-console-linux |    2 +- >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/lib/debian-installer/detect-console-linux > b/src/lib/debian-installer/detect-console-linux > index 79dde91..404a4e7 100644 > --- a

Re: [PATCH] Remove armeb netboot config

Hi, 2011/6/20 Loïc Minier : > --- > >        Hey > >  It seems this file is a leftover from the armeb removal; ok to remove? I would appreciate to keep armeb bits, just in case there is some unofficial usage or it comes back in the future, which I doubt. Best regards, --  Héctor Orón  -.. . -..

Bug#630000: d-i cannot receive an IP address from Mac OS X

Hello, 2011/6/15 Kenshi Muto : > tags 63 + patch > thanks > > And here is quilt patch for 1.17.1-8. Thanks! Are you able to reproduce on latest busybox (1:1.18.4-2)? Have you tested the patch? Is it suitable to be included upstream? Kind regards, --  Héctor Orón

Re: UUID - autmatically entries?

Hi, 2011/5/22 Miguel Figueiredo : > On Sunday 22 May 2011 07:49:57 Rick Thomas wrote: >> On May 21, 2011, at 11:09 PM, Ron Johnson wrote: >> > Since like many others you find UUIDs a huge jumbled pile of human >> > meaninglessness, then by all means create labels for all your fixed >> > devices,

Bug#630000: d-i cannot receive an IP address from Mac OS X

Hi, 2011/6/22 : > 22.06.2011 16:44, Hector Oron wrote: >> 2011/6/15 Kenshi Muto : > It is already included upstream but only for some future version. [..] > Maybe it's a good idea to include it into squeeze-p-u, and it's > definitely nice fix to have for sid.  I

Re: [PATCH] Remove armeb netboot config

Hi, 2011/6/23 Loïc Minier : > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011, Hector Oron wrote: >> I would appreciate to keep armeb bits, just in case there is some >> unofficial usage or it comes back in the future, which I doubt. >  I don't think there is armeb support AT

Bug#631396: flash-kernel: Please add support for Toshiba AC100

Hello, On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 05:01:19PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Package: flash-kernel > Severity: wishlist Updated version after some IRC comments, for review: From 09e85bde46613216656c1cb9ea0c6eebb530701f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Julian Andres Klode Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011

Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds

Hi, 2011/6/27 Daily build aggregator : > * OLD BUILD:    armel Jun 21 18:50 buildd@alain build_iop32x_netboot Some issues with alain.d.o prevented this to be fixed sooner, should be fixed by today. Best regards, --  Héctor Orón  -.. . -... .. .- -.   -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-. -- Would

Re: armel daily builds stopped since June 21st

Hi guys, 2011/6/26 Steve McIntyre : > It doesn't look like alain came up, so it might need a hard power > cycle when I'm back in the office tomorrow. It is back on-line now. I manually triggered the build, but sometime we get: INFO: starting rsync Read from remote host ravel: Connection reset b

Re: armel daily builds stopped since June 21st

Hi, 2011/6/27 Hector Oron : > I think a safety check on rsync could be added. > Retrying the build... Fixed... http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/ --  Héctor Orón  -.. . -... .. .- -.   -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-. -- Would you like to make a donation for Debian Conf

Bug#637339: Debian installer for Buffalo LS Live (LS-CHL) and Mini (LS-WSGL)

Hello, 2011/8/10 Benjamin Cama : >> >> Thanks. I will submit this patch if you think it's ok. >> >> > Sure.  Presumably Hector Oron will apply the patch for you when you >> > file a bug. Patch applied on version

Bug#572431: busybox: add cross compilation support

Hello Michael, 2011/8/13 Michael Tokarev : > 04.03.2010 10:51, Hector Oron wrote: > Besides, can't we add something like CC=prefix-gcc to the > upstream make arguments (or to conffile), without patching > anything? No need to add upstream changes, on current version I have test

Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds

Hello, 2011/8/30 Daily build aggregator : > Debian installer build overview > --- > > Failed or old builds: > > * FAILED BUILD: armel Aug 29 06:18 buildd@ancina build_kirkwood_netboot-gtk >                 > http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_kirkwood_

Re: Bug#640220: linux-image-3.0.0-1-orion5x: Cannot update kernel image

Hello, On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 06:53:54AM +0200, Michael Ott wrote: > Setting up linux-image-3.0.0-1-orion5x (3.0.0-3) ... > Running depmod. > Examining /etc/kernel/postinst.d. > run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools 3.0.0-1-orion5x > /boot/vmlinuz-3.0.0-1-orion5x > update-

Re: Uploading linux-2.6 (3.0.0-5)

Hello Ben, 2011/9/29 Ben Hutchings : > I intend to upload linux-2.6 version 3.0.0-5 to unstable later this > week.  This will include stable update 3.0.5 and may require an ABI > change (I haven't checked yet).  It should fix the FTBFS on some > architectures in 3.0.0-4 (but other changes may intr

Bug#645738: rootskel: FTBFS on multiple architectures

Package: rootskel Version: 1.98 Severity: serious Hello, Your package fails to build from source on Debian autobuilder network: make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-rootskel_1.98-armel-LUOk5D/rootskel-1.98/src' make[2]: Entering directory `/build/buildd-rootskel_1.98-armel-LUOk5D/rootsk

Re: D-I daily builds failure for armel....

Hello, 2012/2/6 Christian PERRIER : > Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): >> Debian installer build overview >> --- >> >> Failed or old builds: >> >> * OLD BUILD:    armel Jan 31 06:07 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_netboot >>                 >>

Re: armhf installer?

Hello Peter, 2012/2/9 peter green : > E: Unable to locate package kernel-image-3.1.0-1-mx5-di > E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'kernel-image-3.1.0-1-mx5-di' > Are the errors i'm seeing just caused by ongoing kernel transitions in sid > or are they indicative of a bigger problem? That's mo

Bug#667681: flash-kernel: Please add support for Dreamplug / Marvell Kirkwood FDT

Hello, 2012/4/9 Martin Michlmayr : > * Ian Campbell [2012-04-06 09:49]: >> Good question. Some DT stuff gets exported in /proc/device-tree. >> >> Aha: >> $ echo $(cat /proc/device-tree/model) >> Globalscale Technologies Dreamplug > In that case, I believe you should modify your flash-kernel pat

Bug#613714: debian-installer: make debian-installer builds available through Debian infrastructure

Package: debian-installer Version: 20101020 Severity: wishlist Hello, It would be useful if debian-installer images are built through Debian buildd infrastructure instead having to setup build daemons on random sites. It might be a nice goal for next release. Best regards, -- Hector Oron

Re: differences in busybox configurations, part1 (longish)

Hello Ferenc, 2011/2/15 Ferenc Wagner : > Otavio Salvador writes: > >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 22:06, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> >>> FEATURE_SHADOWPASSWDS >>> support for getspent() and friends. >>> Current: deb n  static y  udeb n >>> Proposed action: enable for deb >>> Discussion: It is quite u

Bug#613714: debian-installer: make debian-installer builds available through Debian infrastructure

Hello Otavio, 2011/2/16 Otavio Salvador : > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 19:52, Hector Oron wrote: >>  It would be useful if debian-installer images are built through Debian >> buildd infrastructure instead having to setup build daemons on random sites. >> It might be a nice

Bug#613714: debian-installer: make debian-installer builds available through Debian infrastructure

Hello Otavio, 2011/2/16 Otavio Salvador : > Right but in daily basis? it seems too frequent for me. True, maybe a parallel development daily builder is useful, but the reason I am asking for such feature is to ease the release process and those builds might be useful for other projects such debi

Bug#550584: More info

Hi, 2011/3/4 Martin Michlmayr : > 14:59 < bwh> tbm: Are you going to put those hooks back in flash-kernel >  some time soon? > 15:02 < tbm> bwh: I asked joeyh and Sledge for help but nobody suggested >  a solution.  If someone sends a patch, I'd be happy to upload. > 15:06 < bwh> tbm: The solution

Bug#550584: Initial triggers patch and tracking of highest kernel

Hi, 2011/3/9 Loïc Minier : >  I had forgotten the actual flash-kernel call.  I've also added >  a --supported test at the top in this v2. Last night I tested this patch, but maybe I was doing something wrong as it did not seem to work. Then I manually generated uImage and uInitrd and now kernel

Bug#550584: Initial triggers patch and tracking of highest kernel

Hi, 2011/3/10 Loïc Minier : >  Ah thanks; sorry that it's not working, do you have the log of running >  flash-kernel/kernel updates etc.? Sorry I do not keep any logs, I'll do next time. >>  1. Chainload boot, at first boot load the usual kernel then call the >> new one with kexec, if everythi

Bug#550584: Initial triggers patch and tracking of highest kernel

Hi, 2011/3/10 Hector Oron : > 2011/3/10 Loïc Minier : >>>  1. Chainload boot, at first boot load the usual kernel then call the >>> new one with kexec, if everything is fine then the user can replace >>> old kernel with new kernel, else the kexec call fails and

Bug#550584: Initial triggers patch and tracking of highest kernel

Hi, 2011/3/10 Loïc Minier : >  Not sure what you mean; I understand that cross-compiled kernel .debs >  should follow the same interface (/etc/kernel*) as described in the >  kernel packaging handbook.  Maybe the tool you use doesn't generate the >  proper postinsts and needs to be fixed? I mean

Bug#612376: flash-kernel: please include efikamx support

, -- Hector Oron -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110404115627.GA26134@enorme.TCLDOMAIN.OFFICE

Re: Debian ARM architectures and subarchitectures

Hi, (CC debian-boot to see if someone there knows better) 2011/4/4 Arnaud Patard : > Hector Oron writes: >>   I am not sure how current Debian subarchitectures map to. Is it just >> a giving name? Do they map to platform devices in linux kernel? Do >> they map to machine

Bug#612376: flash-kernel: please include efikamx support

Hi Martin, 2011/4/4 Martin Michlmayr : > * Hector Oron [2011-04-04 12:56]: >>   Please comments on: >>   >> http://git.debian.org/?p=d-i/flash-kernel.git;a=commitdiff;h=fa8fdbc9607ebd892eba1e1c3b4ad12f710c901f > > Clint added a boot.scr file in his original patch.

Bug#612376: flash-kernel: please include efikamx support

Hello, 2011/4/4 Loïc Minier : >  It would be nice if you could file a bug against linux to get the new >  flavor; I personally would recommend -mx5. That's fine with me. I'll wait for the bug report until we had proper patches for kernel. >  Technically, mx5 would only support mx51 right now, b

Bug#612376: flash-kernel: please include efikamx support

Hi, 2011/4/4 Clint Adams : > On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 04:35:03PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote: >> I would say we want to install on which ever is mounted under /boot, >> so if /boot/boot.txt is present, then boot.scr is regenerated >> everytime kernel is installed. > > I

Bug#620888: flash-kernel: please add armhf support

) UNRELEASED; urgency=low [ Hector Oron ] * Add Efika Smartbook and Nettop support (Closes: #612376) + * Add armhf support -- Hector Oron Mon, 04 Apr 2011 16:13:12 +0100 diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 465a495..8264e2d 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control

debian-installer: armhf initial work

Hello, I would like to start merging armhf changes into debian-installer master branch. I wanted to ask if someone feels opposed to that work going into master or have any comment about it. Initial changes are very preeliminar and it might need some fiddling to get it working as it is using d

Re: debian-installer: armhf initial work

Hi, 2011/4/20 Jeremiah C. Foster : > It might be nice to get some information and updates about your > progress so people can test and help out if needed. I proceeded and added some changes to relevant packages (see IRC log or check git commits). I added armhf to flash-kernel master, but it need

Re: armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console)

Hi, 2011/5/9 Christian PERRIER : > By the way, I use this opportunity to mention that Joey already said a > couple of times he would be happy to drop builds on his machine in > favor of an autobuilder. It probably "just" needs someone with the > required knowledge and access to setup a daily buil

Re: armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console)

Hi, 2011/5/10 Philipp Kern : > If I get an machine name of a Debian armel buildd with LVM I can install it > there, too.  Otherwise most is explained in [1]. Thanks very much! Could you do the setup, now that you are at it on alain.debian.org, otherwise ping me? Best regards, --  Héctor Orón  

Re: armel D-I build faillure (orion5x_network-console)

Hi, 2011/5/10 Hector Oron : > 2011/5/10 Philipp Kern : >> If I get an machine name of a Debian armel buildd with LVM I can install it >> there, too.  Otherwise most is explained in [1]. > Thanks very much! > Could you do the setup, now that you are at it on alain.debian.org

Bug#626434: flash-kernel: please add u-boot script support

am a bit stuck on how to set ROOTPARTITION on the bootscript, at the moment I have it hardcoded, but hopefully we can find a way around it. >From 93003a5b3affc1a5f3b3abac98d22d077a06f388 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hector Oron Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 23:15:17 + Subject: [PATCH] fl

Re: debian-installer: kernel lagging for sh4, m68k, alpha

Hello, Sorry for late reply, I have just found this email in my records. Just note that this email call for update, was related to Squeeze release. 2011/5/8 Thorsten Glaser : > The packages are linux-image-2.6.38-2-{amiga,atari,…} > versioned as *_2.6.38-5_m68k.deb (I don’t know which > of these

Re: [listmas...@lists.debian.org: Re: Cron sudo -u buildd /home/buildd/di/di-autobuild/buildscript]

Hi, 2011/6/13 Stephen Gran : > Can someone figure out what to do here? That was fixed! Thanks for the heads up! Best regards, --  Héctor Orón  -.. . -... .. .- -.   -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-. -- Would you like to make a donation for Debian Conference?    ** http://debconf11.debconf.org

Re: [PATCH] add support for omap devices

Hello Sebastian, 2011/6/15 Sebastian Reichel : > this commit adds support for >  * Nokia N900 >  * Beagleboard >  * Pandaboard > --- >  debian/changelog               |    9 - >  src/system/subarch-arm-linux.c |    4 +++- >  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Thanks for th

Re: [PATCH] add support for omap devices

Hello, 2011/6/15 Sebastian Reichel : > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 07:33:03PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote: > This mail is just about adding support for omap to libdebian-install. I was missing libdebian-installer bit. > I will continue with flash-kernel (which calls archdetect in one of >

Re: [PATCH] add support for omap devices

Hi, 2011/6/15 Sebastian Reichel : > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:11:14PM +0200, Hector Oron wrote: >> I was missing libdebian-installer bit. > > I used git send-email. Looks like it does not include a reference to > the git project. I guess I will have to send single patche

Re: [PATCH] add support for omap devices

Hi, 2011/6/15 Sebastian Reichel : > add support for the following omap devices to libdebian-install: Applied. Thanks. --  Héctor Orón  -.. . -... .. .- -.   -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-. -- Would you like to make a donation for Debian Conference?    ** http://debconf11.debconf.org/payments

Bug#594878: flash-kernel: please add mv78xx0 support

Package: flash-kernel Version: 2.32 Severity: wishlist Hello, This is an attempt to add mv78xx0 target to `flash-kernel' package. Find patch attached. Best regards, diff -Naur flash-kernel-2.32/debian/changelog flash-kernel-2.32.mv78xx0//debian/changelog --- flash-kernel-2.32/debian/chang

Bug#693839: debian-installer: kernel install fails on armel buffalo linkstation pro, missing uboot-mkimage

Hi, 2013/1/2 Cyril Brulebois : > Christian PERRIER (29/12/2012): >> > u-boot-tools is only in “Suggests” for flash-kernel, while your >> > situation suggests it might be better to have it in “Recommends”. >> > What do others think? >> Well, I even moved it to Depends in my commit. I'm not sure

Bug#697675: debootstrap: please report package version-revision

Package: debootstrap Version: 1.0.44 Severity: wishlist Hello, On a current debootstrap run: [..] I: Retrieving libacl1 I: Validating libacl1 I: Retrieving adduser I: Validating adduser I: Retrieving apt I: Validating apt [..] When using debootstrap to create a given environment, it would b

Bug#697675: debootstrap: please report package version-revision (patch)

On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 11:02:19AM +0100, Hector Oron wrote: > Package: debootstrap > Version: 1.0.44 > Severity: wishlist > When using debootstrap to create a given environment, it would be nice to > output version-revision information to keep track of which software versio

Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds

Hello, 2013/2/3 Gaudenz Steinlin : > It seems that the build deamon (ancina) that was building the d-i images > for armel is currently down. Do you have any updates on what's happening > or could you please move the build to another host if the failure is > expected to last longer. ancina has

Bug#596716: debian-installer: please add easy path to bpo and volatile sources

ard to ask a new debconf question on whether you want to add bpo and/or volatile sources list for the installer to pick up new kernel and packages. Best regards, -- Hector Oron -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (700, 'unstable'

Bug#670938: flash-kernel: support is missing for LaCie Kirkwood NASes

Tags: pending kthxbye Hi, 2012/5/3 Martin Michlmayr : > Loďc, can you please review/apply. > * Simon Guinot [2012-04-25 03:42]: >> Package: flash-kernel >> Version: 3.0~rc.4 >> Severity: normal >> Tags: patch >> >> Dear Maintainer, >> >> uImage et uInitrd files are not generated for LaCie Kirkw

Bug#670530: debian-installer-6.0-netboot-armel: missing support for LaCie NASes (Kirkwood)

Cheers, -- Hector Oron -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120504151926.ga9...@flaco.tsc-farm.upc.es

Bug#670530: debian-installer-6.0-netboot-armel: missing support for LaCie NASes (Kirkwood)

Hello, On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 03:00:20PM +0200, Simon Guinot wrote: > Additionally, here is a patch to add LEDs modules for LaCie device to > the network-console installer. Please consider submitting a new bug report for such change once #671200 is clarified. Thanks. Cheers, -- Hecto

Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds

Hi, 2012/5/18 Daily build aggregator : > * OLD BUILD:    armel May 08 08:10 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_netboot >                 > http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_netboot.log Apologies guys, but ancina.d.o doing d-i dailies is down. We are trying to contact local admi

Re: armhf missing on http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/

Hello, 2012/5/28 Francesca Ciceri : > It seems to be in webwml/english/template/installer.wml. > This change is needed to add the armhf link in the arch list: > > - devel-images-arches>amd64\narmel\nhppa\nkfreebsd-i386\nkfreebsd-amd64\ni386\nia64\nmips\nmipsel\npowerpc\nsparc\ns390\nsource > + de

Re: [GIT/PATCH] libdebian-installer: Add support for dreamplug

Hello Ian, 2012/7/10 Ian Campbell : > Martin tells me this is necessary for d-i to pick the correct kernel > while installing. I believe him ;-) Thanks for the patch, it looks fine to me, but incomplete for d-i. You need to add Dreamplug platform in debian-installer configuration (see installer/b

Re: [GIT/PATCH] libdebian-installer: Add support for dreamplug

Hello Ian, 2012/7/17 Ian Campbell : > diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog > index 9edf023..c5f7181 100644 > --- a/debian/changelog > +++ b/debian/changelog > @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ > +flash-kernel (3.2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > + > + * Use get_machine in flash-kernel-installer udeb. Fixe

Bug#682977: unblock: flash-kernel/3.2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package flash-kernel Due to missing detection of the hardware in udeb, later d-i support for Dreamplug was not properly working. The flash-kernel 3.2 version attempts to fix

Re: [GIT/PATCH] libdebian-installer: Add support for dreamplug

Hello Ian, 2012/7/12 Martin Michlmayr : > * Ian Campbell [2012-07-10 15:31]: >> Martin tells me this is necessary for d-i to pick the correct kernel >> while installing. > > Looks good. Hector, please apply after beta 1 is done. Ian, could you push your changes adding Dreamplug support for libd

Re: [GIT/PATCH] libdebian-installer: Add support for dreamplug

Hi, 2012/7/27 Ian Campbell : > On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 17:25 +0200, Hector Oron wrote: > Did the d-i beta get done? I must have been sleeping ;-) No, not really, I think I got that wrong. Got confused with alpha1. >> Unblock request has already been filed. >> Could you poke m

Re: [GIT/PATCH] libdebian-installer: Add support for dreamplug

Hi Ian, 2012/7/27 Ian Campbell : > On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 18:37 +0200, Hector Oron wrote: >> > Did the d-i beta get done? I must have been sleeping ;-) >> >> No, not really, I think I got that wrong. Got confused with alpha1. OK, I think we can go ahead now. :-) r

Bug#1037186: debian-installer: bookworm d-i graphics are not shown on Raptor system

Source: debian-installer Version: 20230526 Severity: important X-Debbugs-Cc: tpear...@raptorcs.com, zu...@debian.org Hello, We found latest installer for bookworm is missing ast DRM kernel module, causing graphical failure on ppc64el Raptor machines. Could you please consider the following