Hello,
On 16/07/2023 at 06:07, Alex Wibowo wrote:
Image version:
Please mention which ISO image you used, or at least which Debian
version your installed. I assume Debian 12.
03:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Broadcom Inc. and subsidiaries
BCM4331 802.11a/b/g/n [14e4:4331] (rev 02)
On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 at 18:27:24 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> But, what matters here is the CTTE ruling in #1035831 -- for the time being,
> packages must not move files between locations affected by the aliasing.
If that happens in reality, then yes, that's bad, and reverting the change
is a miti
On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 18:27:24 +0200 Adam Borowski
wrote:
> Package: debootstrap
> Version: 1.0.128+nmu3
> Severity: grave
>
> bluca's NMU on 2023-07-15 makes debootstrap produce chroots using the
> aliased-dirs scheme. While it's currently the default scheme for
non-buildd
> systems, it is both n
On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 at 18:27:24 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> bluca's NMU on 2023-07-15 makes debootstrap produce chroots using the
> aliased-dirs scheme.
My intention in the MR that was included in the NMU[1] was to default to
merged-/usr chroots in all cases for trixie and up, but continue to
pr
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 at 12:42:11 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> In the meanwhile, I'll immediately revert the sabotage.
Both of you, please don't turn this into an NMU war in the archive:
that doesn't benefit anyone. I would have preferred it if Adam had not
immediately uploaded a 0-day revert, but
debootstrap_1.0.128+nmu5_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debootstrap_1.0.128+nmu5.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.128+nmu5.tar.gz
debootstrap_1.0.128+nmu5_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 12:42:47 +0100
Source: debootstrap
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.128+nmu5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
C
On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 12:54:35 +0100 Simon McVittie
wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 at 12:42:11 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > In the meanwhile, I'll immediately revert the sabotage.
>
> Both of you, please don't turn this into an NMU war in the archive:
> that doesn't benefit anyone. I would have pr
On 2023-07-16, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jul 2023 at 18:27:24 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>> But, what matters here is the CTTE ruling in #1035831 -- for the time being,
>> packages must not move files between locations affected by the aliasing.
>
> If that happens in reality, then yes, th
On Sun, 2023-07-16 at 12:54 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 at 12:42:11 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > In the meanwhile, I'll immediately revert the sabotage.
>
> Both of you, please don't turn this into an NMU war in the archive:
> that doesn't benefit anyone. I would have pre
10 matches
Mail list logo
