On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 08:45:35PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 08:35:22AM +, š§ Christophe wrote:
> > Configure network: Ā Ā Ā [E]
> >
> > Comments/Problems:
> >
> > This bug is present since many years.
>
> :-)
>
>
> > Currently, tt's not possible to declare
grub-installer_1.188_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
grub-installer_1.188.dsc
grub-installer_1.188.tar.xz
grub-installer_1.188_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 23:30:22 +0100
Source: grub-installer
Architecture: source
Version: 1.188
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Chang
Source: debian-installer
Version: 20230217
Severity: minor
Hey.
In the end this is probably anyway completely ignored, so consider this
just a cosmetic issue:
AFAICS, the installer cretes swap entries in fstab as:
none swap sw 0 0
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/partman-basicfilesyst
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 00:33, Christoph Anton Mitterer
wrote:
> Anyway... maybe it makes sense to use some other value, most likely
> "defaults" then...
Hi, the only time that "defaults" should be used in field 4 of /etc/fstab is
when a value to the right of it (field 5 or 6) are required to be
On Wed, 2023-03-29 at 00:49 +, David wrote:
> In that situation, field 4 has to be non-blank, which is when setting
> it
> to "defaults" becomes useful.
>
> Otherwise, putting "defaults" in field 4 achieves nothing, because
> defaults
> are defaults so there is no reason to specify them.
Does
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 00:54, Christoph Anton Mitterer
wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-03-29 at 00:49 +, David wrote:
> > In that situation, field 4 has to be non-blank, which is when setting
> > it to "defaults" becomes useful.
> >
> > Otherwise, putting "defaults" in field 4 achieves nothing, because
On Wed, 2023-03-29 at 01:41 +, David wrote:
> Yes, for many years using Debian stable, my swap lines in
> /etc/fstab look like this:
> Ā noneĀ swap
Hmm, I'm not sure whether strictly speaking it's allowed to skip the
4th field.
The manpage explicitly documents so for the 5th and the 6th, but n
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 01:56, Christoph Anton Mitterer
wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-03-29 at 01:41 +, David wrote:
> > Yes, for many years using Debian stable, my swap lines in
> > /etc/fstab look like this:
> > none swap
>
> Hmm, I'm not sure whether strictly speaking it's allowed to skip the
>
On Wed, 2023-03-29 at 02:25 +, David wrote:
> My thought process is as follows:
> Field 4 is for mount options. This is just the same as providing
> options to the 'mount' command issued at the command line.
> And it is ok to use the 'mount' command without options.
Well that's clear and it pr
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 02:49, Christoph Anton Mitterer
wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-03-29 at 02:25 +, David wrote:
> > My thought process is as follows:
> > Field 4 is for mount options. This is just the same as providing
> > options to the 'mount' command issued at the command line.
> > And it is o
Hello,
On 29/03/2023 at 00:23, Charles Curley wrote:
I tried installing with the most recent weekly build. I noticed the
following line toward the end of syslog:
Mar 28 21:35:59 main-menu[425]: (process:4506): cut:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/firmware-ipw2x00.md5sum: No such file or directory
This mig
12 matches
Mail list logo
