Hi all,
now that there's massive work on making non-free firmware to work easily in
debian-installer and the distribution, would it be possible, to bring the
topic of ath9k-htc free firmware forward?
There are some longstanding bugreports for this (and related, some in CC); is
there any chance t
Holger Wansing (2023-01-28):
> now that there's massive work on making non-free firmware to work easily
> in debian-installer and the distribution, would it be possible, to bring
> the topic of ath9k-htc free firmware forward?
>
> There are some longstanding bugreports for this (and related, some
Package: hw-detect
Severity: important
Hi,
# Context
Quoting the text that was agreed to via the 2022 General Resolution
about non-free firmware:
We will include non-free firmware packages from the "non-free-firmware"
section of the Debian archive on our official media (installer image
Package: hw-detect
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Quoting the text that was agreed to via the 2022 General Resolution
about non-free firmware:
When the installer/live system is running we will provide
information to the user about what firmware has
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 08:09:58PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Package: hw-detect
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
>
> # Allowing for main-only
>
> The next sentence of the text that was agreed to is:
>
> The included firmware binaries will normally be enabled by default
> where the
Hi,
Am 28. Januar 2023 17:27:28 MEZ schrieb Cyril Brulebois :
>Holger Wansing (2023-01-28):
>> now that there's massive work on making non-free firmware to work easily
>> in debian-installer and the distribution, would it be possible, to bring
>> the topic of ath9k-htc free firmware forward?
>>
Package: apt-setup
Severity: normal
After a regular installation from netinst, sources.list usually looks
like this:
# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 12.0.0 _Sid_ - Unofficial amd64 NETINST with
firmware 20230128-23:05]/ sid local main non-free non-free-firmware
#deb cdrom:[Debian GNU
Hey kibi!
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 08:09:58PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Package: hw-detect
>Severity: important
>
>Hi,
>
>
># Context
>
>Quoting the text that was agreed to via the 2022 General Resolution
>about non-free firmware:
>
>We will include non-free firmware packages from the "non
Steve McIntyre (2023-01-29):
> >I'm proposing:
> > - “hw-detect/firmware” as template for hw-detect;
>
> I was thinking "hw-detect/load_firmware" might be better - we may
> want/need more firmware questions yet, so let's leave the namespace
> open?
That's exactly what someone has already thought
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #1029848 [hw-detect] hw-detect: decide how to configure firmware support
Added tag(s) pending.
--
1029848: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029848
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 patch pending
Cyril Brulebois (2023-01-29):
> If we really want not to use a bare /firmware, maybe /firmware-lookup?
> But having something specialized in hw-detect and something much more
> generic in preseed would look strange to me. I don't really mind either
> way.
This seems
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch pending
Bug #1029848 [hw-detect] hw-detect: decide how to configure firmware support
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1029848: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029848
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
12 matches
Mail list logo
