Upload for tasksel to bullseye now done

Hi, Cyril Brulebois wrote (Thu, 10 Feb 2022 07:28:26 +0100): > Samuel Thibault (2022-02-09): > > > I have uploaded it. > > > > It's in! > > Thanks for jumping in. > > > Now we have to wait for it to reach testing before submitting the > > changes for stable. > > That's not a requirement. An

Processing of tasksel_3.68~deb11u1_source.changes

tasksel_3.68~deb11u1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tasksel_3.68~deb11u1.dsc tasksel_3.68~deb11u1.tar.xz tasksel_3.68~deb11u1_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

tasksel_3.68~deb11u1_source.changes REJECTED

Version check failed: Your upload included the source package tasksel, version 3.68~deb11u1, however stable already has version 3.68. Uploads to proposed-updates must have a higher version than present in stable. Mapping bullseye to stable. Mapping stable to proposed-updates. === Please feel

Re: Upload for tasksel to bullseye now done

Hi, Holger Wansing wrote (Sun, 20 Feb 2022 09:36:59 +0100): > Hi, > > Cyril Brulebois wrote (Thu, 10 Feb 2022 07:28:26 +0100): > > Samuel Thibault (2022-02-09): > > > > I have uploaded it. > > > > > > It's in! > > > > Thanks for jumping in. > > > > > Now we have to wait for it to reach test

Processing of tasksel_3.68+deb11u1_source.changes

tasksel_3.68+deb11u1_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tasksel_3.68+deb11u1.dsc tasksel_3.68+deb11u1.tar.xz tasksel_3.68+deb11u1_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

tasksel_3.68+deb11u1_source.changes ACCEPTED into proposed-updates->stable-new

Mapping bullseye to stable. Mapping stable to proposed-updates. Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 08:06:36 +0100 Source: tasksel Architecture: source Version: 3.68+deb11u1 Distribution: bullseye Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install

Re: Would allowing preseed to be a tarball a good idea?

On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 10:32 PM Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 03:55:30PM +0800, Glen Huang wrote: >> On Feb 18, 2022, at 4:48 AM, Geert Stappers wrote: On Feb 16, 2022, at 5:50 PM, Geert Stappers wrote: > > The initrd of d-i can indeed be extended / appended. >>

Re: Would allowing preseed to be a tarball a good idea?

Adding a tar dependency to the boot process doesn't sound great, especially when it's unnecessary.

Possible to force installing from the mirror instead of the installation media?

Hi, I remember reading it somewhere in a Debian doc (though I can no longer find it) that only netboot automatically installs the base system from a mirror, other media install from the media itself and then upgrade via the mirror if allowed. I wonder if it's possible to force the installer to us

Re: Would allowing preseed to be a tarball a good idea?

The installer already supports tar (via busybox) if I'm not mistaken. Regards, Glen

Re: Possible to force installing from the mirror instead of the installation media?

On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 12:05:53PM +0800, Glen Huang wrote: > Hi, > > I remember reading it somewhere in a Debian doc (though I can no > longer find it) that only netboot automatically installs the base > system from a mirror, other media install from the media itself and > then upgrade via the mi

Re: Possible to force installing from the mirror instead of the installation media?

On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 12:05:53PM +0800, Glen Huang wrote: > Hi, > > I remember reading it somewhere in a Debian doc (though I can no > longer find it) that only netboot automatically installs the base > system from a mirror, other media install from the media itself and > then upgrade via the mi