On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 04:08:24PM -0500, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
> Control: tags = confirmed
>
> CCing the release team, and CTTE because I don't know who else is
> tracking issues related to the usrmerge effort. I've consciously chosen
> not to pour gasoline on
Am 03.12.2021 um 22:08 schrieb Nicholas D Steeves:
2. Reassign to src:rescue, and fix the rescue system.
Looks like a duplicate of
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769738
(Speaking only on my own behalf, not on behalf of the TC, here)
On Fri, 03 Dec 2021 at 16:08:24 -0500, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> 1. Debian isn't yet ready for usrmerge
Merged /usr is not actually the problem here, although it exacerbates what
appears to be a pre-existing bug in the rescue mode[
On Sat, Dec 4, 2021, 6:45 AM Simon McVittie wrote:
> (Speaking only on my own behalf, not on behalf of the TC, here)
>
> On Fri, 03 Dec 2021 at 16:08:24 -0500, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> > 1. Debian isn't yet ready for usrmerge
>
> Merged /usr is not actually the problem here, although it exacer
Simon McVittie writes:
>> 2. Reassign to src:rescue, and fix the rescue system.
>
> I think this will have to be the answer. See also [0].
I'm certainly not against fixing this issue, but I thought I'd point out
that even as things are, its pretty trivial to get into rescue mode.
Having just te
On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 11:37:28PM +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
>Le 03/12/2021 à 22:08, Nicholas D Steeves a écrit :
>>
>>
>> c) parse /target/etc/fstab, and attempt to mount other partitions
>
>The rescue system already offers to do it for separate /boot and /boot/efi,
>so why couldn't it d
Le 03/12/2021 à 22:08, Nicholas D Steeves a écrit :
c) parse /target/etc/fstab, and attempt to mount other partitions
The rescue system already offers to do it for separate /boot and
/boot/efi, so why couldn't it do for separate /usr too ?
7 matches
Mail list logo
