Processed: Re: Bug#982270: linux: [armhf] several imx6 systems unable to detect ethernet

Processing control commands: > reassign 982270 linux Bug #982270 [installation-reports] installation-reports: Installing Debian Bullseye on Cubox-i4 - installer finds no ethernet Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'linux'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #982270

Bug#982270: linux: [armhf] several imx6 systems unable to detect ethernet

Control: reassign 982270 linux Control: retitle 982270 linux: [armhf] several imx6 systems unable to detect ethernet Control: found 982270 5.10.13-1 On 2021-02-07, Rick Thomas wrote: > It booted fine but when it got to the "Detect network hardware" phase, > it failed and said: > >> No Ethern

Re: Bug#982283: override: bsdmainutils:oldlibs/optional

* Samuel Thibault [210211 00:56]: > As I mentioned previously in the bug, bsdutils (required) recommends > bsdextrautils, so for that part things don't change. > > For calendar and cal/ncal, the question indeed holds. For bsdmainutils > maintainers: I guess the goal of splitting them out of bsdma

state of shim and shim-signed.

I have noticed that there seem to be issues with shim and shim-signed, the former has a complaint from the gcc maintainers about being built with an old version of gcc, the latter depends on an old version of shim. Are their plans to fix this for bullseye? are their difficulties getting new versi

Re: state of shim and shim-signed.

peter green (2021-02-11): > I have noticed that there seem to be issues with shim and shim-signed, > the former has a complaint from the gcc maintainers about being built > with an old version of gcc, the latter depends on an old version of shim. > > Are their plans to fix this for bullseye? are

Re: state of shim and shim-signed.

Thanks KiBi, was about to respond via d-boot anyway. :-) On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 11:59:44PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > >peter green (2021-02-11): >> I have noticed that there seem to be issues with shim and shim-signed, >> the former has a complaint from the gcc maintainers about being built

Bug#982422: debootstrap: segmentation fault around ldconfig during debootstrapping bullseye/arm64 on a buster/amd64 host

Yes, indeed! Great! I've just tried with qemu-user-static from buster- backports, and it seems to be fine. On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 13:32 -0600, Dick Hollenbeck wrote: > I upgraded to the latest qemu-user-static using a manual download of > the *.deb from packages.ubuntu.com and installed > using dp