On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 07:58:05PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 12:26 +1000, Vincent McIntyre wrote:
> > Package: hw-detect
> > Version: 1.124
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: patch
> >
> > I keep seeing this in installer logs, back to jessie.
> >
> > Aug 2 01:52:11 main-men
Hello there,
I still see the same on my installation:
Ubuntu 16.04:
Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d .
run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools
4.4.0-140-generic /boot/vmlinuz-4.4.0-140-generic
update-initramfs: Deleting /boot/initrd.img-4.4.0-140-generic
run-parts: executing /etc
Hi again. In short I kind of just copied that post blindly and only now looked
into things further.
> Mmm, do you mean that this postinst script ends up calling setupcon
> --force --save in a living Ubuntu system, not the installer of Ubuntu?
> The script checks for the presence of the /lib/debi
Mike McGuire, le lun. 07 janv. 2019 18:57:18 +, a ecrit:
> I did just try this myself and you're right, this didn't trigger it. Which
> got me to think more of what could have and I did recently build wine in an
> ubuntu chroot which is a plausible cause, I think?
That could have triggered r
It's a xenial chroot and it indeed doesn't have that test in
keyboard-configuration.postinst. Perhaps just an ubuntu issue then, sorry for
the noise. ;-)
Hi,
the Debian Policy is not strict there under
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#priority
so I better ask:
Is there any sense in adding a Priority field for udeb packages?
For example like this for cdebconf:
snip---
Source: cdebconf
Section: utils
Block
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.113
Debootstrap started to fail with busybox since version 1.0.113.
Previously it worked flawlessly with busybox. It fails silently, but
debootstrap.log contains the following error:
date: invalid date 'Tue, 15 Jan 2019 02:23:06 UTC'
The reason is commit
8 matches
Mail list logo
