Hi,
Christian PERRIER wrote:
> I think this is a glitch in the l10n-sync script. Given that these
> strings are in sublevel 1 in the package's POT files AND in the master
> files, they are NOT automatically moved to SL2.
>
> My aadvice would be to :
>
> - manually drop them from the package's t
Hi,
For some reason, the netboot installer packages do not contain the
mini.iso files. This is explicitly filtered out by way of a "grep -v
mini.iso", which "git blame" tells me has always been the case.
Anyone know (or remember) why that is so? I think that having .iso files
on a VM host that ar
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jun 2018 12:19:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#901717: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.104
has caused the Debian Bug report #901717,
regarding debootstrap: Version 1.0.102 breaks use of file mirrors
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jun 2018 12:19:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#901717: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.104
has caused the Debian Bug report #901717,
regarding debootstrap: Version 1.0.102 breaks use of file mirrors
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Tue, 26 Jun 2018 12:19:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#899155: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.104
has caused the Debian Bug report #899155,
regarding vmdebootstrap: command failed: umount /tmp/tmp... | ERROR:
/tmp/tmp.../etc/machine-id: Device or resource busy
to be mar
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2018 20:41:13 +0900
Source: debootstrap
Binary: debootstrap debootstrap-udeb
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.104
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By:
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist
Hi all,
as a follow-up on #902020, I looked into the build process of armhf
installation media. As I am not very familliar with the build process
and the history of the different components, I would like to post some
observations and a draft patch add
Package: flash-kernel
Version: 3.91
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
There is a typo in the clearfog pro DTB name: pre -> pro.
Easy enough to fix, so please find the patch below:
>From 1d19172e0326a2e2ee2a5d236bad13a99a8f88e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josua Mayer
Date: Tue,
Hi,
Wouter Verhelst (2018-06-26):
> For some reason, the netboot installer packages do not contain the
> mini.iso files. This is explicitly filtered out by way of a "grep -v
> mini.iso", which "git blame" tells me has always been the case.
>
> Anyone know (or remember) why that is so? I think th
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 05:09:07PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wouter Verhelst (2018-06-26):
> > For some reason, the netboot installer packages do not contain the
> > mini.iso files. This is explicitly filtered out by way of a "grep -v
> > mini.iso", which "git blame" tells me has al
Hello,
On Mon, 28 May 2018, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> debian-boot@: the requested revert looks fine to me, bonus points if it
> comes with a (short) summary of these reasons in changelog, so that they
> can be emphasized in the release announcement. :)
I reverted the change in git:
https://salsa.d
Package: src:debian-installer-netboot-images
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
The debian-installer-*-netboot-* packages currently explicitly filter
out mini.iso by way of an explicit "grep -v mini.iso", which according
to git history has always been the case.
One use case for having mini.iso files on host
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #902432 [flash-kernel] flash-kernel: There is a typo in Clearfog Pro DTB
name
Added tag(s) pending.
--
902432: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=902432
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 06:17:31PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 28 May 2018, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > debian-boot@: the requested revert looks fine to me, bonus points if it
> > comes with a (short) summary of these reasons in changelog, so that they
> > can be emphasized i
Hi Hideki,
I can confirm this patch fixes the initial issue, but installing some
packages with apt after gives me some issues:
/lib/ld-linux-ar/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3: No such file or directory
Version 1.0.101 does not cause these issues.
I will investigate this more this week and get back to
Hi Wouter,
Wouter Verhelst (2018-06-26):
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 05:09:07PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Anyway: no specific opinion on whether shipping (sometimes multiple)
> > mini.iso is a good idea. Open a wishlist bug report against dini source
> > and see what regular dini contributo
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > I think this is a glitch in the l10n-sync script. Given that these
> > strings are in sublevel 1 in the package's POT files AND in the master
> > files, they are NOT automatically moved to SL2.
> >
> > My aadvice would be to :
>
Hi Raphaël,
Raphael Hertzog (2018-06-26):
> I reverted the change in git:
> https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/pkgsel/commit/2b9b594855a409fa6d03f259ccca4b1a1bd4727b
ACK, thanks for the notice.
> I haven't uploaded the package yet. I had to reword the debconf
> template. Is the modified t
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> The use of “you” seems to be one of the common errors I mentioned above.
> We tend to avoid pointing fingers at users.
>
> Hrm. Grepping across our packages' templates, I see a lot of “you”s so I
> might just be misremembering. Or maybe we've tried har
19 matches
Mail list logo
