What should have gone to the BTS directly
- Forwarded message from ioann@gmail.com -
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 10:40:14 +0300
From: ioann@gmail.com
To: Geert Stappers
Subject: Re: Bug#813285: debian-installer: Error in DHCP
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.3.0-1-amd64; KDE/4.14.14
On Sunday 31 January 2016 08:27:53 you wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
> Stop
>
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 09:15:06AM +0300, ioann sys wrote:
> > When, installer step request network configuration, my network card
> > (std Realtek up to 1GB) take new name "enp4s0", when std name "eth0".
> > And t
On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 09:15 +0300, ioann sys wrote:
> Package: debian-installer
> Severity: important
>
> Hello Dear Maintainer!
>
> I downloaded testing iso image and write this on the flash. Booting from this
> usb flash disk (selected UEFI mode), trying install this OS on physical
> machine
>
On Sunday 31 January 2016 10:32:02 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 09:15 +0300, ioann sys wrote:
> > Package: debian-installer
> > Severity: important
> >
> > Hello Dear Maintainer!
> >
> > I downloaded testing iso image and write this on the flash. Booting from
> > this usb flash di
On Sun 31 Jan 2016 10:40:14 +0300, From: ioann@gmail.com
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 09:15:06AM +0300, ioann sys wrote:
> > When, installer step request network configuration, my network card
> > (std Realtek up to 1GB) take new name "enp4s0", when std name "eth0".
> > And this device can not rec
os-prober_1.71_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
os-prober_1.71.dsc
os-prober_1.71.tar.xz
os-prober-dbgsym_1.71_i386.deb
os-prober-udeb_1.71_i386.udeb
os-prober_1.71_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coc
os-prober_1.71_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
os-prober_1.71.dsc
os-prober_1.71.tar.xz
os-prober-dbgsym_1.71_i386.deb
os-prober-udeb_1.71_i386.udeb
os-prober_1.71_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.o
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 07:38:56 +0100
Source: os-prober
Binary: os-prober-udeb os-prober
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.71
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Chris
Hi Cyril and debian-boot,
On Thu, 4 Dec 2014 00:36:40 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Thanks for the patch, but clearly not for jessie.
How about stretch?
--
Best regards
Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen
Adding Marco in copy:
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz (2016-01-30):
> Package: debootstrap
> Version: 1.0.78
> Severity: important
>
> Hi!
>
> Since the upgrade to version 1.0.76 it's no longer possible to create chroots
> with --foreign and a consequential --second-stage which is particularly useful
Processing control commands:
> notfound -1 1.0.75
Bug #813242 [debootstrap] debootstrap: second stage foreign boostrap fails
No longer marked as found in versions debootstrap/1.0.75.
> found -1 1.0.78
Bug #813242 [debootstrap] debootstrap: second stage foreign boostrap fails
Marked as found in ver
Control: notfound -1 1.0.75
Control: found -1 1.0.78
Adding Marco to the loop (maybe same bug as #813232):
Michael Büsch (2016-01-30):
> Package: debootstrap
> Version: 1.0.75
> Severity: important
>
> I use debootstrap in combination with qemu-user (binfmt-misc) to bootstrap
> Raspbian armhf o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 813242 1.0.78
Bug #813242 [debootstrap] debootstrap: second stage foreign boostrap fails
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #813242 to the same values
previously set
> notfound 813242 1.0.75
Bug #813242 [debootstrap] debootstra
Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen (2016-01-31):
> Hi Cyril and debian-boot,
>
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2014 00:36:40 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Thanks for the patch, but clearly not for jessie.
>
> How about stretch?
To be honest I'm not sure how wise it would be to have a less
deterministic behaviour than
This time with d-boot in CC...
Forwarding to debian-boot, as requested from Cyril.
Debian-Boot people, please take a look at #650601 -- the libpng16
transition which is now ready to be started. There are a few udebs
affected, which is tested as described below (following a request from
Cyril).
I
Your message dated Sun, 31 Jan 2016 15:52:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#813285: fixed in units 2.12-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #813285,
regarding debian-installer: Error in DHCP
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
dh-di_8_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
dh-di_8.dsc
dh-di_8.tar.xz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 16:45:54 +
Source: dh-di
Binary: dh-di
Architecture: source
Version: 8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Colin Watson
Description:
dh-di
Control: reopen -1
stop
Hi Stephen,
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 03:54:25PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Your message dated Sun, 31 Jan 2016 15:52:57 +
> with message-id
> and subject line Bug#813285: fixed in units 2.12-2
> has caused the Debian Bug report #813285,
> regarding deb
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #813285 {Done: Stephen Kitt } [debian-installer]
debian-installer: Error in DHCP
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them.
Bug reopened
No longer marked
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:34:51PM +0300, ioann@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sunday 31 January 2016 10:32:02 Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 09:15 +0300, ioann sys wrote:
> >
> > > And this device can not recive IP-address. My router using option:
> > > "Address Reservation".
> >
> >
21 matches
Mail list logo
