On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 04:34 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I'm a bit unsure. If sparc ever comes back as sparc64, it might make
> sense to reuse some bits.
They can always be recovered from the VCS history or the attic.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 12:02 -0400, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Ian Campbell [2015-07-22 09:10]:
> I think it is the DEBIAN_FRONTEND which is supposed to work for the
> installer case, which you added back in 2008. in-target appears to have
> set DEBIAN_FRONTEND=passthrough since 2005, but perhaps so
On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 04:34 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
[...]
> I'm a bit unsure. If sparc ever comes back as sparc64, it might make
> sense to reuse some bits. But I'm not sure whether both archs would be
> close enough for that to happen, or if they would be different beasts
> like arm{el,hf} a
Package: flash-kernel
Version: 3.45
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Durin a dist-upgrade flash-kernel was run. apt-get stopped. Any subsequent
action resulted in segfault.
After rebooting running flash-kernel resulted in the same behavior.
I booted with an older kernel 3.16 and the problem
* Michele Cane [2015-07-31 21:11]:
> Durin a dist-upgrade flash-kernel was run. apt-get stopped. Any subsequent
> action resulted in segfault.
> After rebooting running flash-kernel resulted in the same behavior.
> I booted with an older kernel 3.16 and the problem war gone.
> Rebooting with the
Hi Martin,
It was me on the qnap forum. So yes It is on a qnap TS-419P II.
Cheers
Mike
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 9:39 PM Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Michele Cane [2015-07-31 21:11]:
> > Durin a dist-upgrade flash-kernel was run. apt-get stopped. Any
> subsequent action resulted in segfault.
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
