Attached new patch inverts the sense of the option after review of the
wording by debian-l10n-english and fixes the propagation of the setting
to the installed grub2 package.
Ian.
From 4e038e33ea681dde7cccb05ba5a1a6b1e3ae8d6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ian Campbell
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 15:1
Control: block 789798 by 792547
I've tested both of these patches (grub-installer [0] and grub2 [1]
together but the grub-installer one doesn't do much without the grub2
one, since it appears that the installation of the grub-* packages also
ends up running grub-install during installation.
Ian.
Hi,
Michael Biebl (2015-07-16):
> Am 15.07.2015 um 19:08 schrieb Martin Pitt:
> > Cyril Brulebois [2015-07-15 18:03 +0200]:
> >> Bottom line(s):
> >> ---
> >> I'll be testing 221-1 to make sure I reproduce the issue with a full
> >> install, then 221-1 + two patches to make sure it go
Processing control commands:
> block 789798 by 792547
Bug #789798 [grub-installer] grub-installer: add option to _not_ install to
UEFI boot order
789798 was not blocked by any bugs.
789798 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 789798: 792547
--
789798: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b
Processing control commands:
> block 789798 by 792547
Bug #789798 [grub-installer] grub-installer: add option to _not_ install to
UEFI boot order
789798 was blocked by: 792547
789798 was not blocking any bugs.
Ignoring request to alter blocking bugs of bug #789798 to the same blocks
previously s
Hey Cyril,
thanks for preparing the update! FTR, the debdiff below looks good to
me, +1.
Martin
Cyril Brulebois [2015-07-16 9:23 +0200]:
> diff -Nru systemd-221/debian/changelog systemd-221/debian/changelog
> --- systemd-221/debian/changelog 2015-06-28 12:05:49.0 +0200
> +++ system
On Thu, 2015-07-16 at 08:34 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Control: block 789798 by 792547
>
> I've tested both of these patches (grub-installer [0] and grub2 [1]
> together but the grub-installer one doesn't do much without the grub2
> one, since it appears that the installation of the grub-* packa
On 2015-07-16 09:23, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> > As for doing a t-p-u: sounds fine with me.
>> > I'll be around today/Thursday but then away until Monday. But systemd is
>> > in more then capable hands with Martin.
> I'm attaching the source debdiff against the version in testing to this
> mail, so
Niels Thykier (2015-07-16):
> On 2015-07-16 09:23, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >> > As for doing a t-p-u: sounds fine with me.
> >> > I'll be around today/Thursday but then away until Monday. But systemd is
> >> > in more then capable hands with Martin.
> > I'm attaching the source debdiff against th
* Peter Nagel [2015-07-08 15:12]:
> The problem seems to appear only when jessie is installed to RAID (e.g.
> RAID1)!
> Error message:
> flash-kernel-installer does not find UUID (see the two lines of syslog
> below):
> in-target: UUID eeb34bbe-375a-4dc1-939d-f56b801a4c75 doesn't exist in
> /dev
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:05:48AM -0400, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Peter Nagel [2015-07-08 15:12]:
> > The problem seems to appear only when jessie is installed to RAID (e.g.
> > RAID1)!
> > Error message:
> > flash-kernel-installer does not find UUID (see the two lines of syslog
> > below):
>
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 10:29:29PM +0200, neonknight wrote:
>Package: debian-installer
>Version: 20150422+deb8u1
>Followup-For: Bug #767880
>
>Same problem here, though it only seems to appear in the graphical installer
>but not in text installer. And cryptsetup is also missing in initramfs.
>
>St
Hi,
Colin Watson (2015-07-16):
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:05:48AM -0400, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > On a related note, flash-kernel waits for user input when the UUID of
> > root is not found, which makes sense in an installed system, but not
> > in d-i -- for the user, d-i will just hang with
On 2015-07-16 05:48, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Are you using the text mode installer or the graphical installer?
Text mode.
> There's no X in the former,
You are right, it is not X. Something else that makes the screen
flash. Flashing frequency is about 2 Hz, way to fast for failing
X :~) I can s
Cyril Brulebois (2015-07-16):
> Uploaded and accepted into tpu, thanks.
And binary builds are getting rejected due to the python3-systemd binary
which was split out of src:systemd, and has a higher version in testing
(230-1 >> 221-1+deb9u1).
I've therefore cherry-picked:
| commit 3eabc6e72657015
On 2015-07-15 23:47, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> regularly on various X220 machines for *ages* and never seen this. Is
> there anything special at all about your SD card? Is the machine
> locked, or can you get to logs?
I'm so much used to a perfectly working d-i, that I didn't even
remember the 4th c
Manged to install with CSM enabled. None of the before mentioned
problems occur. After installation switched back to pure UEFI and was
able to boot the new installation.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas..
Hey all,
Cyril Brulebois [2015-07-16 21:09 +0200]:
> And binary builds are getting rejected due to the python3-systemd binary
> which was split out of src:systemd, and has a higher version in testing
> (230-1 >> 221-1+deb9u1).
Argh pain!
> I'm attaching the matching git format-patch and seeking
18 matches
Mail list logo
