Package: Busybox
Version: v1.22.1
If the /etc/passwd (or shadow) entry for the user is empty, I invoke `sulogin'
without arguments from an ordinary shell
prompt, it prints `System Maintenance Mode', rather than to ask user for a
password "Give root password for system maintenance
(or type Contro
Unfortunately, ldlinux.c32 is still being sought and not found. Any
news?
--
.''`. martin f. krafft @martinkrafft
: :' : proud Debian developer
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Descrip
Package: di-netboot-assistant
Version: 0.38a
Severity: serious
The pxelinux.0 file installed by di-netboot-assistant does not work.
Before it even asks for pxelinux.cfg/* files, it seeks ldlinux.c32
(cf. #750586), but the menu defined in pxelinux.cfg/default
eventually sets the search path, so thi
Package: di-netboot-assistant
Version: 0.38a
Severity: wishlist
There seems to be no way to elegantly handle serial console clients.
In the past, one already had to copy e.g.
daily/i386/pxelinux.cfg/default to the UUID-specific file of
a client, thereby hardcoding daily/i386 for this client and fo
martin f krafft, le Thu 29 Jan 2015 11:52:36 +0100, a écrit :
> 2. the boot: prompt appears on both, console and serial console,
Nack with my brltty maintainer hat: you don't want to send things on the
serial port without the user saying to do this. In the case of braille
devices, we have alread
Deze email nieuwsbrief werd in grafisch HTML formaat verzonden.
Als u deze tekstversie ziet, verkiest uw email programma "gewone tekst" emails.
U kan de originele nieuwsbrief online bekijken:
http://sendmail.itdude.be/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 776565 759424
Bug #776565 [di-netboot-assistant] Booting does not currently work
Bug #776565 [di-netboot-assistant] Booting does not currently work
Added tag(s) moreinfo and patch.
Bug #759424 [di-netboot-assistant] di-netboot-assistant
29.01.2015 15:12, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> martin f krafft, le Thu 29 Jan 2015 11:52:36 +0100, a écrit :
>> 2. the boot: prompt appears on both, console and serial console,
>
> Nack with my brltty maintainer hat: you don't want to send things on the
> serial port without the user saying to do th
debian-installer-netboot-images_20150107_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer-netboot-images_20150107.dsc
debian-installer-netboot-images_20150107.tar.xz
debian-installer-8-netboot-amd64_20150107_all.deb
debian-installer-8-netboot-arm64_20
binary:debian-installer-8-netboot-amd64 is NEW.
binary:debian-installer-8-netboot-arm64 is NEW.
binary:debian-installer-8-netboot-armel is NEW.
binary:debian-installer-8-netboot-armhf is NEW.
binary:debian-installer-8-netboot-i386 is NEW.
binary:debian-installer-8-netboot-kfreebsd-amd64 is NEW.
bin
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 04:05:45PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 29.01.2015 15:12, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > martin f krafft, le Thu 29 Jan 2015 11:52:36 +0100, a écrit :
> >> 2. the boot: prompt appears on both, console and serial console,
> >
> > Nack with my brltty maintainer hat: you don'
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package console-data
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'console-data'
Limit currently set to 'package':'console-data'
> reassign 776526 console-setup 1.88
Bug #776526 [console-data] some packages don't depend on deb
martin f krafft (2015-01-29):
> Package: di-netboot-assistant
> Version: 0.38a
> Severity: serious
[…]
> So far I have been unable to find *anything* to make
> di-netboot-assistant produce a usable TFTP directory layout, even
> for a single architecture, without having to hand-edit files for
>
also sprach Cyril Brulebois [2015-01-29 16:44 +0100]:
> Latest news (hrm) are:
> [2013-07-17] Accepted 0.38a in unstable (low) (Christian Perrier)
> [2013-07-28] di-netboot-assistant 0.38a MIGRATED to testing (Britney)
>
> At this stage, it'd probably be a good idea to have it removed
> from
martin f krafft (2015-01-29):
> also sprach Cyril Brulebois [2015-01-29 16:44 +0100]:
> > Latest news (hrm) are:
> > [2013-07-17] Accepted 0.38a in unstable (low) (Christian Perrier)
> > [2013-07-28] di-netboot-assistant 0.38a MIGRATED to testing (Britney)
> >
> > At this stage, it'd probabl
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> Latest news (hrm) are:
> [2013-07-17] Accepted 0.38a in unstable (low) (Christian Perrier)
> [2013-07-28] di-netboot-assistant 0.38a MIGRATED to testing (Britney)
And that was probably a translation-only upload...:-)
signature.asc
Description: D
also sprach Cyril Brulebois [2015-01-29 18:58 +0100]:
> I'm not sure it's reasonable to expect fixing di-n-a at this point of
> the release cycle, frankly.
Of course, but maybe the fix is trivial… on the other hand, I looked
and tried already… there is a patch. Lemme at least verify that one
on t
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 07:01:32AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>
> > Changes:
> > libdebian-installer (0.99) unstable; urgency=medium
> > .
> >* Replace NULL terminator for the arm map_hardware table, accidentally
> > dropped in 0.92 (Closes: #776488).
>
>
> Hello Dann,
hey Chris
Upon request, you can find console.txt in attachment.console-common console-data/bootmap-md5sum string
876d4b9e319d8b0e4f037405c5ce8393
console-common console-data/keymap/family select qwertz
console-common console-data/keymap/fullselect
console-common console-data/keymap/ig
we want to test the RC-1 installer on a single boot (no osx) 2014 13"
macbook air. Can anyone help us with the suggested partition layout ?
Fedora 21 installs and has the following partitions:
sda1 hfs+
sda2 /boot ext4
sda3 /
etc.
the jessie install wants to see a /boot/efi partition
any sug
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:00:43 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#766960: fixed in debian-installer-netboot-images 20150107
has caused the Debian Bug report #766960,
regarding debian-installer-netboot-images: Please provide packages for Debian 8
to be marked as done.
This me
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:34:48 +0100
Source: debian-installer-netboot-images
Binary: debian-installer-8-netboot-amd64 debian-installer-8-netboot-arm64
debian-installer-8-netboot-armel debian-installer-8-netboot-armhf
debia
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 Use of depreciated graphics param with grub2
Bug #775317 [debian-installer] Depreciated kernel graphics params
Changed Bug title to 'Use of depreciated graphics param with grub2' from
'Depreciated kernel graphics params'
--
775317: http://bugs.debian.or
Control: retitle -1 Use of depreciated graphics param with grub2
To reclarify the problem, now that I have investigated and solved it in
live-build: I noticed a message from grub2 about VGA=788 being a
depreciated graphics param, and being relatively new to linux I
mistakenly thought this was a ke
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + patch
Bug #775317 [debian-installer] Use of depreciated graphics param with grub2
Added tag(s) patch.
--
775317: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775317
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSC
Control: tags -1 + patch
I've made a stab at writing a patch.
I'm new to the d-i codebase, and perl, and I don't have a test
environment set up to run and test the code, so please review carefully.
Two areas of concern I have:
1) While I understood the use of grub-gencfg well enough to implement
di-netboot-assistant 0.38a is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2015-02-13
It is affected by these RC bugs:
759424: di-netboot-assistant: please update package for jessie / new syslinux
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Quoting dann frazier (da...@dannf.org):
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 07:01:32AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> >
> > > Changes:
> > > libdebian-installer (0.99) unstable; urgency=medium
> > > .
> > >* Replace NULL terminator for the arm map_hardware table, accidentally
> > > dropped in
Christian PERRIER (2015-01-30):
> Quoting dann frazier (da...@dannf.org):
> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 07:01:32AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > > Unless I'm wrong, the released changelog hasn't been pushed in git nor
> > > has the 0.99 released been tagged.
> >
> > I did push it - and I do s
29 matches
Mail list logo