Bug#756893: ram requirements for d-i: stats in d-i manual

2014-08-04 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Holger Wansing (2014-08-03): > > the ram requirements needed to install with d-i stated in the > > d-i manual are not up-to-date. > > > > Indeed they are outdated since release of Wheezy and before. > > Read > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2013/05/msg00654

Bug#756893: ram requirements for d-i: stats in d-i manual

2014-08-04 Thread Samuel Thibault
Holger Wansing, le Mon 04 Aug 2014 11:22:06 +0200, a écrit : > Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Holger Wansing (2014-08-03): > > > the ram requirements needed to install with d-i stated in the > > > d-i manual are not up-to-date. > > > > > > Indeed they are outdated since release of Wheezy and before.

Bug#756893: ram requirements for d-i: stats in d-i manual

2014-08-04 Thread Samuel Thibault
Holger Wansing, le Mon 04 Aug 2014 11:22:06 +0200, a écrit : > So what needs to be changed? > In > https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2013/05/msg00662.html > I have already proposed the following: > > > Table 3.2. Recommended Minimum System Requirements > Install TypeRAM (minimal)

Bug#756996: mentions of 2.6 kernel in the d-i manual

2014-08-04 Thread Holger Wansing
Package: installation-guide Tags: patch Hi, in the d-i manual, I have noticed there are some mentions of 2.6 kernel being the default kernel series in Debian. I have prepared a patch to fix that (attached). Please note that I have added an entity for the default kernel series shipped with the

Bug#756996: mentions of 2.6 kernel in the d-i manual

2014-08-04 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Holger Wansing, le Mon 04 Aug 2014 11:55:43 +0200, a écrit : > Please note that I have added an entity for the default kernel series > shipped with the respective release. > Would it be worse to add such an entity? I'm actually surprised it wasn't there already.: > Is 3.14 kernel for Jes

Bug#756893: ram requirements for d-i: stats in d-i manual

2014-08-04 Thread Brian Potkin
On Mon 04 Aug 2014 at 11:39:29 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Holger Wansing, le Mon 04 Aug 2014 11:22:06 +0200, a écrit : > > So what needs to be changed? > > In > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2013/05/msg00662.html > > I have already proposed the following: > > > > > > Table 3.2. R

www.lists.debian.org

2014-08-04 Thread Brendon
Hi, I found your contact over the web and wanted to send you a quick note. With Search Engine Optimization and Web Development, I can help your business achieve better ranking on prominent search engines like Google, Bing & others to generate more leads/sales. This may look like one of those sp

Bug#756996: mentions of 2.6 kernel in the d-i manual

2014-08-04 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 12:14 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Holger Wansing, le Mon 04 Aug 2014 11:55:43 +0200, a écrit : > > Please note that I have added an entity for the default kernel series > > shipped with the respective release. > > Would it be worse to add such an entity? > >

Bug#756996: mentions of 2.6 kernel in the d-i manual

2014-08-04 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Holger Wansing, le Mon 04 Aug 2014 11:55:43 +0200, a écrit : > > Please note that I have added an entity for the default kernel series > > shipped with the respective release. > > Would it be worse to add such an entity? > > I'm actually surprised it was

Bug#756996: mentions of 2.6 kernel in the d-i manual

2014-08-04 Thread Samuel Thibault
Holger Wansing, le Mon 04 Aug 2014 22:54:17 +0200, a écrit : > Then there is no need to create that entity at all, right? Indeed. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http