Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #715408 [debian-installer] Error in Testing installier
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
--
715408: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=715408
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: severity -1 important
Manfred Rebentisch (2013-07-08):
> Package: debian-installer
> severity: critical
Failure on a single machine isn't exactly critical, downgrading severity.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
I don't know why, but I didn't receive your email. I just read it on
bugs.debian.org.
Using the patched ISOs I noticed an error in the patch: In 41cdset
$filename was incorrectly used instead of $ISOname. Therefore too many
ISOs were considered as part of the set. The corrected patch is
Quoting Andreas Cadhalpun (andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com):
> I haven't heard from Ian since his last mail on 13th October and I
> have no clue what he has in mind as a more general solution. Perhaps
> he has been busy otherwise.
>
> In general I think, that it would be good to include the patc
> I suppose that could be mitigated if we created a file something like:
>
> /target/Instalation-In-Progress
>
> [...]
>
> I'm not sure that's a good idea though -- it seems somewhat fragile.
Actually, I rather like your idea. There could be a notice that the
system is partially installed, toget
On Thursday 31 October 2013 20:22:53 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hello,
>
> while looking briefly at the tasksel bug list, I saw #385650:
> tasksel: The kde-desktop task should list kaffeine(-mozilla) media player
> → http://bugs.debian.org/385650
>
> Since that's quite old, I'm not sure it still
On Friday 01 November 2013 16:27:58 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On Thursday 31 October 2013 20:22:53 Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > while looking briefly at the tasksel bug list, I saw #385650:
> > tasksel: The kde-desktop task should list kaffeine(-mozilla) media play
Hi!
On 31/10/13 23:39, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Secondly: xfce as default desktop? I'm tempted to do this regardless
> of the current init debate, if nothing else just to give us a useful
> *small* system from a single CD again.
I don't think I grasp the 'default desktop' concept or its implicatio
Hi there!
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:39:31 -0700, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Finally, I've been getting some useful feedback on the front of
> exactly which images we should be making at this point, and I'm
> thinking of dropping most of the CD options, leaving us with:
>
> * netinst
> * *1* single CD
Luca Capello (2013-11-01):
> IMHO there should be a DE with the basic needs (music&pictures, office,
> Internet life), I do not know how much that would take with Xfce. Then,
> one possibility would be to check what Grml (Bcc:ing Michael Prokop)
> provides that d-i does not, I usually have a Grml
Le Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:39:31PM +, Steve McIntyre a écrit :
>
> Finally, I've been getting some useful feedback on the front of
> exactly which images we should be making at this point, and I'm
> thinking of dropping most of the CD options, leaving us with:
>
> * netinst
> * *1* single C
11 matches
Mail list logo
