Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> Hi,
>
> some background: choose-mirror is a bit special in that it fetches
> during the source build (when online) an updated version of the mirror
> list[1] and embeds it into the source package. The Said file is
> .gitignore'd, meaning it doesn't show
Christian PERRIER (2013-10-12):
> That seems fairexcept that, being a frequent uploader of
> choose-mirror, I'm very likely to forget about that when building it
> then committing back after the build (as I'm building in pbuilder, the
> Mirrors.masterlist file in my local git checkout is not u
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> That should ensure we see the need for an update while we're preparing
> the source package, and that we take appropriate measures when that
> happens. What do you think?
Ack. I'm sure I can still find a way to still fail from time to time
but, eh...yo
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I installed Debian using debian-7.1.0-amd64-CD-1.iso and
debian-7.2.0-amd64-CD-2.iso burned to CD.
However, the eject button of the drive does not work during installation
(afterwards, it works fine), so I have to switch to another
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + hw-detect mountmedia
Bug #724931 [debian-installer] ISO loopback support for Debian installer
Added indication that 724931 affects hw-detect and mountmedia
--
724931: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724931
Debian Bug Tracking System
Co
Control: affects -1 + hw-detect mountmedia
Hi,
the patch for this bug affects the following packages:
* apt-setup
* cdrom-detect
* hw-detect (check-missing-firmware)
* mountmedia
Since among the maintainers of all these packages is Christian Perrier,
I'm sending this to you.
A short summa
Christian PERRIER (2013-10-12):
> Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
>
> > That should ensure we see the need for an update while we're preparing
> > the source package, and that we take appropriate measures when that
> > happens. What do you think?
>
> Ack. I'm sure I can still find a w
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
Hi,
I do not have this problem with the recent Debian installer.
Have you tried it with the debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso from the
following site?
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/20131012-1/amd64/iso-cd/
Please send a mail
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug #715408 [debian-installer] Error in Testing installier
Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo.
--
715408: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=715408
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
choose-mirror_2.50_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
choose-mirror_2.50.dsc
choose-mirror_2.50.tar.gz
choose-mirror_2.50_all.udeb
choose-mirror-bin_2.50_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 21:06:29 +0200
Source: choose-mirror
Binary: choose-mirror choose-mirror-bin
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 2.50
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Change
Bernard McNeill (2013-10-12):
> Have these two bugs been addressed in 7.2?
(-boot@ would have been a better place to ask.)
AFAICT those bugs weren't reassigned to the relevant packages, and not
fixed in unstable. That's usually the prerequisite to having bugs fixed
in stable.
Mraw,
KiBi.
sign
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> [ Side notes:
>1. It's a serious bug to depend on the network;
>2. It's also not deterministic to allow failure in doing so. ]
Have you ever looked at the debian-installer source package's network
use? I'm just saying. If I were throwing arbitrary rules out there,
Joey Hess (2013-10-12):
> Have you ever looked at the debian-installer source package's network
> use? I'm just saying.
Fetching packages from the same mirror isn't exactly the same as wgetting a
file from an http location without any kind of verification. I'm just saying.
src:debian-installer's
Hi Christian,
please find attached the output of calc-release-status as of today. I've
committed a few fixes to the said script earlier so that it reaches the
end (mostly making sure the git checkout worked for all packages), but
I'm not sure the results are OK. Can you please have a quick look an
Hi,
I initially didn't pay much attention to the actual packages listed on:
http://d-i.debian.org/git-summary.html
linux-modules-di-*-2.6 have been gone for a while, see .mrconfig commit:
| r67037 | joeyh | 2011-11-21 19:21:58 +0100 (Mon, 21 Nov 2011) | 10 lines
|
| removed entries for linux-k
16 matches
Mail list logo
