Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* OLD BUILD:i386 Sep 19 00:02 buildd@biber build_cdrom_isolinux
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/build_cdrom_isolinux.log
* FAILED BUILD: i386 Sep 19 00:02 buildd@biber build_
Hi all,
Cyril Brulebois (2013-09-20):
> Daily build aggregator (2013-09-20):
> > Debian installer build overview
> > ---
> >
> > Failed or old builds: [ many ]
>
> We know there's apt's #723705, so I've decronned the build aggregator for now.
thankfully, apt develo
Hi folks!
As I've mentioned lately[1], it seemed like a good idea to try and
implement some automated udeb (un)installability checks. It wasn't
hard given there's already edos-debcheck[2], which does the job
under the hood for edos.debian.net[3].
1. https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2013/09/m
console-setup_1.100_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
console-setup_1.100.dsc
console-setup_1.100.tar.gz
keyboard-configuration_1.100_all.deb
console-setup_1.100_all.deb
console-setup-mini_1.100_all.deb
console-setup-linux_1.100_all.deb
console-setu
console-setup_1.100_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
console-setup_1.100.dsc
console-setup_1.100.tar.gz
keyboard-configuration_1.100_all.deb
console-setup_1.100_all.deb
console-setup-mini_1.100_all.deb
console-setup-linux_1.100_all.deb
Your message dated Sat, 21 Sep 2013 13:18:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#667056: fixed in console-setup 1.100
has caused the Debian Bug report #667056,
regarding console-setup: Please add Tibetan choice for console-setup in D-I
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 07:00:34 +0200
Source: console-setup
Binary: keyboard-configuration console-setup console-setup-mini
console-setup-linux console-setup-freebsd bdf2psf console-setup-udeb
console-setup-amiga-ekmap consol
Hi,
looks like the first edos-caught uninstallability bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/723948
(I don't think we need more in the diff mail, given dependency graphs
are on the website. But we could keep edos-debcheck's output there to
ease pasting into bug reports.)
Mraw,
KiBi.
--- Begin Message ---
With the current trunk/experimental 3.11 kernel the separate omap5, mx5
and vexpress flavours have been removed in favour of the armmp flavour
which supports all of those.
So I think we need to switch the installer over too. Since the 3.10
kernel already has the armmp flavour I don't think we even
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: Debian 7.1.0 Binary DVD 1 with WLAN mirror connection
Image version: debian-7.1.0-amd64-DVD-1 (in a DVD drive) plus the WLAN
driver in firmware-nonfree_0.36+wheezy.1.tar.gz (on a USB stick)
Date: 13 September 2013
Machine: Notebook by GBT (Taiwan), Model
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19/09/13 18:57, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Thiemo Nagel (thiemo.na...@gmail.com):
>
>> 2. In case the job doesn't return within a couple of seconds,
>> instruct the user to a) either press keys until enough entropy
>> has been gathered or b
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* OLD BUILD:ia64 May 26 00:12 buildd@alkman build_cdrom
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/ia64/daily/build_cdrom.log
* OLD BUILD:ia64 May 26 00:16 buildd@alkman build_netboot
Cyril Brulebois (2013-09-21):
> As I've mentioned lately[1], it seemed like a good idea to try and
> implement some automated udeb (un)installability checks. It wasn't
> hard given there's already edos-debcheck[2], which does the job
> under the hood for edos.debian.net[3].
>
> 1. https://lists.
13 matches
Mail list logo