Package: flash-kernel
Severity: critical
Tags: d-i
Justification: breaks the whole system
The flash_kernel_set_root script (located under initramfs-tools/hooks) will
attempt to read from stdin in a particular case, which is reached when no
rootdev was found (line 33: read _ignored).
Even though $
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 721485 -1
Bug #721485 [flash-kernel] flash-kernel: flash_kernel_set_root waits for stdin
in a particular case, which makes the installer hang
Bug 721485 cloned as bug 721491
> reassign -1 partman-base
Bug #721491 [flash-kernel] flash-kernel
clone 721485 -1
reassign -1 partman-base
retitle -1 partman-base: /dev/disk links are not refreshed on dreamplug after
repartitioning
found -1 165
thanks
On Sun, 2013-09-01 at 10:51 +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> I reached this case when using and formating an ext2 root partition: it seems
>
Hi,
as I'm getting to see some light at the end of this tunnel, see
http://qa.debian.org/data/bts/graphs/multi/installation-
reports,debian-installer,.png
I've been thinking how to continue...
My current idea/plan is to have the number of open bug
installation-reports
bugs going down to zero (ha
On Sonntag, 1. September 2013, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I don't want to play bug-severity games, but I'd rate this higher than
> wishlist, as 36 hours to even begin the installation is unreasonable.
you can just cancel it and continue.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed messag
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 699136 partman-base
Bug #699136 [partman] partman hangs with specific mbr/usbsticks
Warning: Unknown package 'partman'
Bug reassigned from package 'partman' to 'partman-base'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #699136 to the
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 02:03:09PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sonntag, 1. September 2013, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I don't want to play bug-severity games, but I'd rate this higher than
> > wishlist, as 36 hours to even begin the installation is unreasonable.
>
> you can just cancel it and c
We're now in September, so it's time for our team of magic reviewers to
work on August 2013 archives.
More details on http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SpamClean
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #700688,
regarding Brief install report: Toshi L850/046
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #701493,
regarding installation-reports: successful installation on an Acer TravelMate
P253, but fsta
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #700598,
regarding scrambled/torn display, booting wheezy weekly amd64 CD on L850/046
to be marked as
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #701149,
regarding Instalation failed: Probably the HD was not recognised
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #701545,
regarding installation-reports: Fail to install wheezy with DVD1-RC1
to be marked as done.
T
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #702098,
regarding installation-reports: Installer confused by a repository specified by
its IPv6
to
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #701862,
regarding Fails to boot, no cryptsetup in initramfs
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #702774,
regarding installation-reports: Error message during installation: An attempt
to configure a
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #702959,
regarding installation-report: Desktop Environments and Repositories
to be marked as done.
T
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #703176,
regarding Wheezy rc1 on Samsung series 5 Ultra
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #703626,
regarding Debian 6.0.7 i386 netinstaller problem
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.hol...@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #703648,
regarding installation-reports: Succesful installation Wheezy DI-rc1 amd64 DVD
binary-1 2013
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Sep 02 00:03 buildd@barber build_cdrom_isolinux
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_cdrom_isolinux.log
* FAILED BUILD: amd64 Sep 02 00:03 buildd@barber b
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Dear Maintainer,
I decided to try out the testing installer, and managed to break it by doing
the following:
Created a 32 bit virtuial machine (kvm) with an 8G virtual disk, and used
the testing netinst iso image from today.
In the installer:
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: USB Flash Drive
Image version:
http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/wheezy/main/installer-amd64/current/images/
Date: 8/31/2013 ~23:00 P.M. Central Standard Time
Machine: Custom x86-64 microATX system
Processor: AMD APU A10-6800K (/proc/cpuinfo included
Linux kernel ABI bump in experimental: from 3.11-rc4 to 3.11-rc7
Full summary: http://d-i.debian.org/kernel-summary.html#experimental
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lis
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 721578 partman-zfs
Bug #721578 [debian-installer] debian-installer: LVM + ZFS fails to work
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'partman-zfs'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #721578 to the same values
previ
reassign 721578 partman-zfs
thanks
Quoting Dan Greene (dan-gre...@wi.rr.com):
> At this point, there was an error message, but there didn't seem to be
> anything related to ZFS in /var/log/messages. I chose to contiune the
> installation, and the partitioning screen recognized those partitions as
26 matches
Mail list logo
