partman-auto-crypto_20_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
partman-auto-crypto_20.dsc
partman-auto-crypto_20.tar.gz
partman-auto-crypto_20_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCR
partman-auto-crypto_20_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto-crypto_20.dsc
partman-auto-crypto_20.tar.gz
partman-auto-crypto_20_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 22:53:55 +0200
Source: partman-auto-crypto
Binary: partman-auto-crypto
Architecture: source all
Version: 20
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Christia
partman-auto-lvm_48_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
partman-auto-lvm_48.dsc
partman-auto-lvm_48.tar.gz
partman-auto-lvm_48_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
partman-auto-lvm_48_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto-lvm_48.dsc
partman-auto-lvm_48.tar.gz
partman-auto-lvm_48_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boo
i got debian/armhf up and running on the a10-eoma68 board, but i'd
like to make it easier for other people to install debian on it. the
generally-proven method "go download some whopping great 1gbyte random
image off the internet with packages preinstalled that you don't
actually want" is pretty s
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 12:34:23 +0200
Source: partman-auto-lvm
Binary: partman-auto-lvm
Architecture: source all
Version: 48
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Christian Perr
Package: mklibs
Version: 0.1.37
Severity: serious
Justification: causes ftbfs
Hi,
now that we have fixed alsa-lib/alsa-utils, and updated linux versions
in config files, building d-i fails with:
| I: stripping and copying dynamic linker to ..//lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
| objcopy:./tmp/netboot-gt
partman-auto-raid_22_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
partman-auto-raid_22.dsc
partman-auto-raid_22.tar.gz
partman-auto-raid_22_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
partman-auto-raid_22_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto-raid_22.dsc
partman-auto-raid_22.tar.gz
partman-auto-raid_22_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
partman-auto_107_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
partman-auto_107.dsc
partman-auto_107.tar.gz
partman-auto_107_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boo
partman-auto_107_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto_107.dsc
partman-auto_107.tar.gz
partman-auto_107_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@l
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 14:47:31 +0200
Source: partman-auto
Binary: partman-auto
Architecture: source i386
Version: 107
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Christian Perrier
D
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 13:13:11 +0200
Source: partman-auto-raid
Binary: partman-auto-raid
Architecture: source all
Version: 22
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Christian Pe
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.49
Hi,
Trying to run debootstrap on a system without perl, I get the
following error:
E: No pkgdetails available; either install perl, or build pkgdetails.c from
source
But I can't find pkgdetails.c
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@list
Package: installation-guide-amd64
Severity: normal
While preparing for the dist-ugrade to wheezy I noticed the following
discrepancy:
http://www.debian.org/releases/wheezy/amd64/release-notes/ch-whats-new.en.html#tmpfs-filesystems
"2.2.12. Temporary filesystems" states that /run is a New locatio
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Trying to run debootstrap on a system without perl, I get the
> following error:
> E: No pkgdetails available; either install perl, or build pkgdetails.c from
> source
>
> But I can't find pkgdetails.c
It's in the bootstrap-base udeb. Normally only used in d-i.
--
see shy
i've started a page here which is the notes being collated to get this done:
http://rhombus-tech.net/allwinner_a10/debian_netboot/
l.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://l
Control: tags -1 + pending
Jeroen N. Witmond, le Sat 18 May 2013 16:35:14 +0200, a écrit :
> http://www.debian.org/releases/wheezy/amd64/apcs02.html.en "C.2. The
> Directory Tree" does not mention /run.
Indeed, fixed.
> Also, /run seems not to be part of the "Filesystem Hierarchy
> Standard".
I
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #708775 [installation-guide-amd64] installation-guide-amd64: C.2. The
Directory Tree does not mention /run
Added tag(s) pending.
--
708775: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708775
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.
I've commited it.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20130518203048.gd5...@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr
Hello,
Florian Lohoff, le Tue 14 May 2013 11:54:50 +0200, a écrit :
> i fail to preseed a de-latin1-nodeadkeys keymap into the Wheezy
> d-i.
Yes, only choices provided in the menu system can be preseeded.
> Having a de deadkeys in d-i would be acceptable but not in the
> final system.
Our curr
rootskel_1.103_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_1.103.dsc
rootskel_1.103.tar.gz
rootskel_1.103_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.deb
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 22:28:46 +0100
Source: rootskel
Binary: rootskel
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.103
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Colin Watson
Descriptio
ping!
I'm planning to install Debian GNU/Linux on more boxes.
thanks!
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 14:04 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 00:10 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:57:40PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > >On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 17:46 +0200, Sv
Your message dated Sat, 18 May 2013 22:32:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#702861: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.51
has caused the Debian Bug report #702861,
regarding debootstrap: Debootstrap unmounts /run/shm
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Sat, 18 May 2013 22:32:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#703037: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.51
has caused the Debian Bug report #703037,
regarding dev/shm linked to /run/shm on mipsel
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Sat, 18 May 2013 22:32:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#704744: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.51
has caused the Debian Bug report #704744,
regarding debootstrap: umounts /{dev,run}/shm of the *host* system
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 18 May 2013 22:32:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#706989: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.51
has caused the Debian Bug report #706989,
regarding Please add support for Ubuntu saucy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sat, 18 May 2013 22:32:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#708771: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.51
has caused the Debian Bug report #708771,
regarding debootstrap: pkgdetails.c is missing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
debootstrap_1.0.51_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debootstrap_1.0.51.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.51.tar.gz
debootstrap_1.0.51_all.deb
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.51_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UN
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 23:18:08 +0100
Source: debootstrap
Binary: debootstrap debootstrap-udeb
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0.51
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: C
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 708759 rootskel
Bug #708759 [mklibs] mklibs: d-i FTBFS: $linker: Permission denied
Bug reassigned from package 'mklibs' to 'rootskel'.
No longer marked as found in versions mklibs/0.1.37.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #7
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 01:29:54PM +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Is there still a reason to keep trying the regular mount? Are there cases
> where grub-mount is expected to fail? Maybe only trying grub-mount could be
> the default.
grub-mount is only available on architectures where GRUB has been
Your message dated Sun, 19 May 2013 00:12:02 +0100
with message-id <20130518231202.ga22...@riva.ucam.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#708759: mklibs: d-i FTBFS: $linker: Permission denied
has caused the Debian Bug report #708759,
regarding mklibs: d-i FTBFS: $linker: Permission denied
to be marked as
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
During the live session, WPA/WPA2 encryption key is accepted and the Internet
is accessible via router. However during the installation, the WPA/WPA2
encryption key is being rejected. A workaround is to choose LAN connection and
then choose "Do not
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* FAILED BUILD: amd64 May 19 00:05 buildd@barber build_cdrom_isolinux
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_cdrom_isolinux.log
* FAILED BUILD: amd64 May 19 00:05 buildd@barber b
37 matches
Mail list logo
