I have noticed this issue as well, and upon starting the installer removed
the usb device and procceded with the install as normal. when i got to the
bootloader and started installing it i quickly switched over to tty4 and
noticed that during the install its forcing it to be installed at /dev/sda
w
cdrom-checker_1.25_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
cdrom-checker_1.25.dsc
cdrom-checker_1.25.tar.gz
cdrom-checker_1.25_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
cdrom-checker_1.25_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdrom-checker_1.25.dsc
cdrom-checker_1.25.tar.gz
cdrom-checker_1.25_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-r
base-installer_1.132_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
base-installer_1.132.dsc
base-installer_1.132.tar.gz
base-installer_1.132_all.udeb
bootstrap-base_1.132_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debia
Jonathan Aquilina (15/05/2013):
> I have noticed this issue as well, and upon starting the installer removed
> the usb device and procceded with the install as normal. when i got to the
> bootloader and started installing it i quickly switched over to tty4 and
> noticed that during the install its
base-installer_1.132_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_1.132.dsc
base-installer_1.132.tar.gz
base-installer_1.132_all.udeb
bootstrap-base_1.132_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 10:22:02 +0200
Source: base-installer
Binary: base-installer bootstrap-base
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.132
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 10:09:45 +0200
Source: cdrom-checker
Binary: cdrom-checker
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.25
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Christian Perrier
Hi,
Adam D. Barratt (12/05/2013):
> Based on some informal queries a little while ago, the weekend of
> 15/16 June looks like a good date for the first wheezy point
> release. Would that work for everyone?
I hope to have the d-i side in shape by then.
(Adding -boot@ for their information.)
Mra
Hi folks,
just to let you know, I've just committed some changes in git:
- jessie is the next target.
- current linux kernel is 3.8-1.
The netboot-gtk image can't be built right now because of speech
synthesis: espeakup-udeb isn't installable (#708353/#708357).
Hopefully that'll be fixed soon,
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> Hi folks,
>
> just to let you know, I've just committed some changes in git:
> - jessie is the next target.
> - current linux kernel is 3.8-1.
>
> The netboot-gtk image can't be built right now because of speech
> synthesis: espeakup-udeb isn't insta
Christian PERRIER (15/05/2013):
> So, if, for some packages, it is not wished that they are built and
> uploaded, please say so either in the list or in the changelog in
> git.
Heh. I meant to send a few different "status of" mails. ;)
Since we're on that topic, I'm happy to see Colin and you up
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 08:39 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
[...]
> The installation went well, thanks. The remaining problem is that W8
> boot manager partition on the SSD /dev/sda2 has the boot flag set (not
> changeable from Linux, is it from W8?)
I don't think this boot flag is meaningful on an i
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 13:58 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 08:39 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> [...]
> > On the SSD the Linux partition
> > is /dev/sda5, which I made bootable (also UEFI boot). However, even if
> > grub is written to /dev/sda no grub menu appears, and only W8
cdrom-detect_1.44_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
cdrom-detect_1.44.dsc
cdrom-detect_1.44.tar.gz
cdrom-detect_1.44_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
cdrom-detect_1.44_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdrom-detect_1.44.dsc
cdrom-detect_1.44.tar.gz
cdrom-detect_1.44_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ..
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 15:20 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 13:58 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 08:39 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > [...]
> > > On the SSD the Linux partition
> > > is /dev/sda5, which I made bootable (also UEFI boot). However, even if
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 14:42:37 +0200
Source: cdrom-detect
Binary: cdrom-detect
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.44
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Christian Perrier
D
cdebconf-entropy_0.26_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
cdebconf-entropy_0.26.dsc
cdebconf-entropy_0.26.tar.gz
cdebconf-text-entropy_0.26_i386.udeb
cdebconf-newt-entropy_0.26_i386.udeb
cdebconf-gtk-entropy_0.26_i386.udeb
Greetings,
cdebconf-entropy_0.26_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf-entropy_0.26.dsc
cdebconf-entropy_0.26.tar.gz
cdebconf-text-entropy_0.26_i386.udeb
cdebconf-newt-entropy_0.26_i386.udeb
cdebconf-gtk-entropy_0.26_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 15:38:00 +0200
Source: cdebconf-entropy
Binary: cdebconf-text-entropy cdebconf-newt-entropy cdebconf-gtk-entropy
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.26
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Deb
main-menu_1.40_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
main-menu_1.40.dsc
main-menu_1.40.tar.gz
main-menu_1.40_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ..
main-menu_1.40_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
main-menu_1.40.dsc
main-menu_1.40.tar.gz
main-menu_1.40_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.deb
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 03:58:07PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> So installing grub (grub-efi-amd64) to /dev/sda (the EFI partition
> is /dev/sda2) is the right thing to do? (to boot Linux, and then solve
> the (eventually) missing Windows 8 entry in grub later)
I believe windows will stay in the
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 08:39:42AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> The installation went well, thanks. The remaining problem is that W8
> boot manager partition on the SSD /dev/sda2 has the boot flag set (not
> changeable from Linux, is it from W8?) On the SSD the Linux partition
> is /dev/sda5, whi
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 14:44 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 15:20 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
[...]
> > Can the problem be that the EFI partition containing W8 is /dev/sda2,
> > while I have been writing grub to /dev/sda and /dev/sda5 (Linux /)?
>
> All EFI boot loaders are wr
I'm not so sure about this, but it was necessary on my
machine.
For some reason (correct or not I don't know), 'grub-probe -t device /'
returns TWO entries:
/dev/sda1
/dev/sdb1
This on a ZFS filesystem, where those two are a mirror.
pool: system
state: ONLINE
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 04:10:25PM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> I'm not so sure about this, but it was necessary on my
> machine.
>
> For some reason (correct or not I don't know), 'grub-probe -t device /'
> returns TWO entries:
>
> /dev/sda1
> /dev/sdb1
>
> This on a ZFS filesy
svante.sign...@gmail.com wrote:
>On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 14:44 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 15:20 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
>[...]
>> > Can the problem be that the EFI partition containing W8 is /dev/sda2,
>> > while I have been writing grub to /dev/sda and /dev/sda5 (Linux
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 15:44:49 +0200
Source: main-menu
Binary: main-menu
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.40
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Christian Perrier
Descri
efi-reader_0.12_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
efi-reader_0.12.dsc
efi-reader_0.12.tar.gz
efi-reader_0.12_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-re
efi-reader_0.12_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
efi-reader_0.12.dsc
efi-reader_0.12.tar.gz
efi-reader_0.12_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 16:36:54 +0200
Source: efi-reader
Binary: efi-reader
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Christian Perrier
Desc
os-prober_1.59_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
os-prober_1.59.dsc
os-prober_1.59.tar.gz
os-prober-udeb_1.59_i386.udeb
os-prober_1.59_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRI
os-prober_1.59_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
os-prober_1.59.dsc
os-prober_1.59.tar.gz
os-prober-udeb_1.59_i386.udeb
os-prober_1.59_i386.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 10:05 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 08:39:42AM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > The installation went well, thanks. The remaining problem is that W8
> > boot manager partition on the SSD /dev/sda2 has the boot flag set (not
> > changeable from Linux,
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 17:36:49 +0200
Source: os-prober
Binary: os-prober-udeb os-prober
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.59
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Christian
This one is very simple though. If '/target/boot/zfs' doesn't exist, create it.
The following changes since commit 17a4d0aa3f6341241d2244e5d71369e71e129e7f:
Make sure that 'grub-probe -t device XXX' only takes the first entry if
there's multiple (as if a mirror etc). (2013-05-15 17:46:16 +020
netcfg_1.110_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
netcfg_1.110.dsc
netcfg_1.110.tar.gz
netcfg_1.110_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_1.110_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
netcfg_1.110_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_1.110.dsc
netcfg_1.110.tar.gz
netcfg_1.110_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_1.110_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 17:56:14 +0200
Source: netcfg
Binary: netcfg netcfg-static
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.110
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Christian Perrie
cdrom-retriever_1.29_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
cdrom-retriever_1.29.dsc
cdrom-retriever_1.29.tar.gz
cdrom-retriever_1.29_all.udeb
load-cdrom_1.29_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
cdrom-retriever_1.29_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdrom-retriever_1.29.dsc
cdrom-retriever_1.29.tar.gz
cdrom-retriever_1.29_all.udeb
load-cdrom_1.29_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To U
partman-base_166_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
partman-base_166.dsc
partman-base_166.tar.gz
partman-base_166_i386.udeb
partman-utils_166_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org)
--
To UN
partman-base_166_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-base_166.dsc
partman-base_166.tar.gz
partman-base_166_i386.udeb
partman-utils_166_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 19:00:37 +0200
Source: cdrom-retriever
Binary: cdrom-retriever load-cdrom
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.29
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Chr
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 19:10:25 +0200
Source: partman-base
Binary: partman-base partman-utils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 166
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Christ
Package: installation-guide
Severity: minor
Hi,
I just read something in the d-i manual in
Appendix C. Partitioning for Debian (see
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/apcs01.html.en), which is
confusing:
Shortened to some words, it's like this:
Debian needs at least one partition for i
Processing control commands:
> fixed -1 1.92
Bug #693485 [keyboard-configuration] keyboard-configuration: XKBLAYOUT,
XKBOPTIONS values manually set in /etc/default/keyboard lost on upgrade
Marked as fixed in versions console-setup/1.92.
--
693485: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
control: fixed -1 1.92
Hi,
I've upgraded keyboard-configuration from 1.88 to 1.92,
and the new version seemed to honor the configs
on upgrade (and on manual 'dpkg-reconfigure' too).
--- /etc/default/keyboard.bak
+++ /etc/default/keyboard
@@ -5,6 +5,6 @@
XKBMODEL="acer_laptop"
XKBLAYOUT="us,ua,r
Hi,
Brian Potkin wrote:
> Some references:
>
>http://www.debian.org/volatile/
>http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665852
>http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/03/msg00010.html
>
> So with this patch Section 6.3.5.1 has had "volatile" replaced with
> "rele
On 10 May 2013 04:41, Luca Capello wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> On Wed, 08 May 2013 11:00:34 +0200, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> On 6 May 2013 06:04, Paul Wise wrote:
>>> The current default names for an LVM on LUKS setup are:
>>>
>>> _crypt
>>> -root
>>> -swap_1
>>>
>>> I would like something more consi
The di-netboot-assistant ubuntu sources are out of date.
Please add the latest and clean up the old (non-still-in-support-LTS)
ones.
(I'd have provided a patch, but I don't know what they are but
I am guessing an ubuntu person could fill them in quickly)
Thanks,
--
Matt Taggart
tagg...@debian.o
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 17:46 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 10:05 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
[...]
> Thanks both of you for your help. I have now reinstalled wheezy. All
> seems to go well again, even for grub-efi to install. Since I did not
> get a question I assume the in
Hi everyone,
On 15/05/13 13:59, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Since we're on that topic, I'm happy to see Colin and you upload
> packages with pending changes in git. I don't think it makes sense
> to target a release right now (eglibc + linux + other transitions
> would make that hard if not impossib
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:57:40PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
>On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 17:46 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
>> On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 10:05 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>[...]
>> Thanks both of you for your help. I have now reinstalled wheezy. All
>> seems to go well again, even for
Hi folks!
[ Feel free to forward this to people/derivatives using d-i and who
might be interested in joining the discussion; I intend to contact gtk
maintainers anyway once we reach a consensus, so that they know how
we're going to use their udebs. ]
With wheezy out, I finally looked at the libgt
Hello,
Regis Boudin (15/05/2013):
> On the cdebconf, although I haven't pushed anything for nearly a year,
> mostly because of more house moving, crazy workload, and lack of good
> enough Internet connection, I have a couple of patches that were
> waiting for the jessie release. Some are rather i
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* FAILED BUILD: amd64 May 16 00:05 buildd@barber build_cdrom_isolinux
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_cdrom_isolinux.log
* FAILED BUILD: amd64 May 16 00:05 buildd@barber b
[I'm not subscribed, please CC me in reply]
I'm remastering the install CDs to do offline installs of a custom
package and its dependencies. I am updating the apt repository on the CD
to include the package and its dependencies. One of the dependencies
(libpng) has a data.tar.bz2 member in it. Whe
Hi,
The first point release for "wheezy" (7.1) is scheduled for Saturday
June 15th. Stable NEW will be frozen during the preceding weekend.
As usual, base-files can be uploaded at any point before the freeze.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
61 matches
Mail list logo
