Bug#697890: marked as done (installation-reports: iwconfig not in /sbin)

2013-02-09 Thread Christian PERRIER
reopen 697890 reassign 697890 tasksel retitle 697890 Please add iw to the desktop and laptop tasks thanks Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org): > I guess I'd be happy to see iw in both the desktop and laptop tasks. OK, you guys convinced me. Re-opening the bug, then. Should this be wheezy

Processed: Re: Bug#697890: marked as done (installation-reports: iwconfig not in /sbin)

2013-02-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 697890 Bug #697890 {Done: Christian PERRIER } [installation-reports] installation-reports: iwconfig not in /sbin Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #697890 to the same values previously set > reassign 697890 task

Processing of partman-efi_35_amd64.changes

2013-02-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
partman-efi_35_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-efi_35.dsc partman-efi_35.tar.gz partman-efi_35_amd64.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.d

partman-efi_35_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2013-02-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 13:38:04 +0100 Source: partman-efi Binary: partman-efi Architecture: source amd64 Version: 35 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Cyril Brulebois Descr

Bug#700175: wheezy installation issues

2013-02-09 Thread Ben Wagner
Package: installation-reports Boot method: netinst CD Image version: http://caesar.acc.umu.se/cdimage/wheezy_di_beta4/amd64/iso-cd/debian-wheezy-DI-b4-amd64-netinst.iso Date: 2013-02-08 ~10pm to 2013-02-09 ~ 8am Machine: Dell Inspiron 7520 Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3632QM CPU @ 2.20GHz, 22

Re: howto boot+preseed kfreebsd in qemu (was Re: netcfg: installation on kfreebsd maybe broken?

2013-02-09 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Steve, On Freitag, 8. Februar 2013, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > I'd like to share a recipe that works for an extracted netboot.tar.gz: > > $ qemu-system-x86_64 -m 512 -enable-kvm -net nic -net > user,bootfile=grub2pxe,tftp=. -serial stdio -boot n -drive > if=ide,bus=0,file=/dev/sdX,cache=write

Re: howto boot+preseed kfreebsd in qemu

2013-02-09 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi, On 09/02/13 14:53, Holger Levsen wrote: > nice. though I'd actually prefer to boot the mini.iso unmodified and > still get pre-seeding, is that somehow possible? You'd need to get past the GRUB menu firstly; it's configured never to time out. Can Jenkins send keystrokes? (e.g. cursor down,

Re: howto boot+preseed kfreebsd in qemu (was Re: netcfg: installation on kfreebsd maybe broken?

2013-02-09 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 09/02/13 14:53, Holger Levsen wrote: > nice. though I'd actually prefer to boot the mini.iso unmodified and > still get pre-seeding, is that somehow possible? Actually I see this as a really convenient feature of the GRUB-based netinst images. It's very easy to add preseed and other options to

Bug#697890: marked as done (installation-reports: iwconfig not in /sbin)

2013-02-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 12:43 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > reopen 697890 > reassign 697890 tasksel > retitle 697890 Please add iw to the desktop and laptop tasks > thanks > > Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org): > > > I guess I'd be happy to see iw in both the desktop and laptop tasks. >

Bug#700186: di-netboot-assistant: Hardcoded path /var/lib/di-netboot-assistant/ used by uninstall

2013-02-09 Thread Ken Milmore
Package: di-netboot-assistant Version: 0.37 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, If a per-user configuration is being used, which redefines STATUS_LIB, then issuing the command 'di_netboot_assistant uninstall' does not list the installed netboot images. The hardcoded path /var/lib/di-netboot-assi

Bug#697890: marked as done (installation-reports: iwconfig not in /sbin)

2013-02-09 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk): > > Should this be wheezy material? > > Please. And crda too, as previously discussed. But crda is a Recommends of iw, right? So, it would be pulled by it (and if these dependencies change in the future, we won't have to drop both from the tasks).

Bug#700190: sub...@bugs.debian.org

2013-02-09 Thread terb21
Package: installation-reports Boot method: Netinstall CD Image version: DEBIAN 7.0 BETA4 from http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/wheezy_di_beta4/amd64/iso-cd/debian-wheezy-DI-b4-amd64-netinst.iso Date: 8 February around 16:00 Machine: Home PC Processor: AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor Memory:

Bug#698626: marked as done (Preseeding netcfg/enable doesn't work)

2013-02-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 09 Feb 2013 19:17:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#698626: fixed in netcfg 1.106 has caused the Debian Bug report #698626, regarding Preseeding netcfg/enable doesn't work to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Processing of netcfg_1.106_amd64.changes

2013-02-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
netcfg_1.106_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: netcfg_1.106.dsc netcfg_1.106.tar.gz netcfg_1.106_amd64.udeb netcfg-static_1.106_amd64.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de

netcfg_1.106_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2013-02-09 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:06:18 +0100 Source: netcfg Binary: netcfg netcfg-static Architecture: source amd64 Version: 1.106 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Philipp Kern

Bug#700120: debian-installer: kfreebsd-i386 needs manual editing of /etc/network/interfaces

2013-02-09 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Scott Howard (08/02/2013): > Debian installer cannont connect to debian mirrors while installing > kfreebsd-i386 testing .iso on February 8, 2012 on both > virtualbox-ose and qemu- kvm. After installing, you can manually > edit /etc/network/interfaces and add: looks like the same issue that

Bug#700120: debian-installer: kfreebsd-i386 needs manual editing of /etc/network/interfaces

2013-02-09 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi Scott, On 09/02/13 00:50, Scott Howard wrote: > Debian installer cannont connect to debian mirrors while installing > [...] > After installing, you can manually edit /etc/network/interfaces and add: Please could you clarify - was the installer itself able to contact the mirrors or not? Or wer

Re: netcfg: installation on kfreebsd maybe broken?

2013-02-09 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 08/02/13 19:16, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 08/02/13 11:19, Philipp Kern wrote: >> So writing out interfaces is broken on kfreebsd since November and nobody >> noticed. > > I ran into this problem at least twice when installing new systems but > didn't realise yet it was a problem with the /

Bug#700120: debian-installer: kfreebsd-i386 needs manual editing of /etc/network/interfaces

2013-02-09 Thread Scott Howard
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Hi Scott, > > On 09/02/13 00:50, Scott Howard wrote: >> Debian installer cannont connect to debian mirrors while installing >> [...] >> After installing, you can manually edit /etc/network/interfaces and add: > > Please could you clarify

Bug#700120: debian-installer: kfreebsd-i386 needs manual editing of /etc/network/interfaces

2013-02-09 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 09/02/13 20:48, Scott Howard wrote: > The installers could not connect to the mirrors. The warning screen > popped up telling you that it could not connect and asked if you > wanted to choose another mirror. Thanks for explaining. Although I can't reproduce the issue myself, with beta4 netboot

Bug#697890: marked as done (installation-reports: iwconfig not in /sbin)

2013-02-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 17:35 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk): > > > > Should this be wheezy material? > > > > Please. And crda too, as previously discussed. > > But crda is a Recommends of iw, right? So, it would be pulled by it > (and if these depe

Bug#700190: sub...@bugs.debian.org

2013-02-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2013-02-09 at 18:42 +0100, terb21 wrote: [...] > First of all, I have used graphical installation. I want to write > three things. FIrst during installation I've got information that I > have to install some non-free firmware for my devices. It was > "The missing firmware files are: rtl_ni

Processed: cloning 700190, reassign -1 to src:linux, severity of -1 is important ...

2013-02-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 700190 -1 Bug #700190 [installation-reports] sub...@bugs.debian.org Bug 700190 cloned as bug 700211 > reassign -1 src:linux 3.2.35-2 Bug #700211 [installation-reports] sub...@bugs.debian.org Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports'

Bug#697890: iwconfig not in /sbin

2013-02-09 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org): > reopen 697890 > reassign 697890 tasksel > retitle 697890 Please add iw to the desktop and laptop tasks > thanks > > Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org): > > > I guess I'd be happy to see iw in both the desktop and laptop tasks. > > OK, you

Bug#700190: sub...@bugs.debian.org

2013-02-09 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk): > The line6 driver is in the Linux 'staging' area, and the kernel team > usually does not enable building of such drivers unless specifically > requested. > > But I'll treat this as a request to enable this driver. So this installation report should

Bug#700190: sub...@bugs.debian.org

2013-02-09 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting /me (bubu...@debian.org): > So this installation report should be reassigned to src:linux? OK, forget about it. You did so already, but the ACK from control@bugs.d.o went to another mailbox. signature.asc Description: Digital signature