Hi,
On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 11:43:11PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Probably not RFC1918 addresses, but CGN ranges. And it's probably DNS64 which
> breaks "stuff", rather than NAT64. There's also an effort in the IETF to spec
> out 464XLAT, which will help the remaining cases of old software / ne
The Debian Installer team[1] is pleased to announce the second beta release
of the installer for Debian 7.0 "Wheezy".
Improvements in this release of the installer
=
* espeakup: Fix voice path according to multiarch switch (#682313). This
fixes the
On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 12:19:54AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> I solicited feedback on IPv6 support in d-i through my blog: [0]. I did not
> receive any feedback at all yet. I'd appreciate if some people could go and
> test installations with the attached mini.iso.
There's an updated mini.iso (am
I'm sending a reminder on this issue, it would be best if d-i can
support VLAN using expert mode of installation, configuring VLAN using
iproute2 during installation is much more annoying comparing to
configure it within d-i.
--
Regards,
Aron Xu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@
Hi,
I don't see links to beta2 on http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
But it's there: http://ftp.acc.umu.se/cdimage/wheezy_di_beta2/
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis.
Op 09-09-12 15:35, Cyril Brulebois schreef:
> The Debian Installer team[1] is pleased to announce the second beta rele
Paul van der Vlis (09/09/2012):
> I don't see links to beta2 on
> http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
>
> But it's there: http://ftp.acc.umu.se/cdimage/wheezy_di_beta2/
All links (click any arch) on the former page point to subdirectories
of:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/wheezy_
I will try, for sure.
Last time, i was reading about d-i ipv6 support, i had not enough
experience.
IPv6 requires working infrastructure. IPv6 DNS and NTP, etc...
5-6 months or so i was working, to get these things running.
Gasha
On 09/08/2012 01:19 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
Hi,
I solicited
I'm using ftp.fi.debian.org for some time.
Not fast, and not always works properly.
Gasha
On 09/08/2012 07:37 PM, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
2012/9/8 Michelle Konzack:
Hello Philipp,
Am 2012-09-08 00:19:54, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
I solicited feedback on IPv6 support i
Hi Aron
Aron Xu writes:
> I'm sending a reminder on this issue, it would be best if d-i can
> support VLAN using expert mode of installation, configuring VLAN using
> iproute2 during installation is much more annoying comparing to
> configure it within d-i.
A reminder is nice and if you are lu
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>
> Hi Aron
>
> Aron Xu writes:
>
>> I'm sending a reminder on this issue, it would be best if d-i can
>> support VLAN using expert mode of installation, configuring VLAN using
>> iproute2 during installation is much more annoying comp
found 678694 1.54
thanks
Looks like this is present in wheezy's d-i beta2, so tagging this with the
appropriate version.
john
--
John Morrissey _o/\ __o
j...@horde.net_-< \_ / \ < \,
www.horde.net/__(_)/_(_)/\_
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 678694 1.54
Bug #678694 [preseed] preseed_fetch fails with relative url
There is no source info for the package 'preseed' at version '1.54' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '1.54'
Marked as found in versions
Op 09-09-12 16:32, Cyril Brulebois schreef:
> Paul van der Vlis (09/09/2012):
>> I don't see links to beta2 on
>> http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
>>
>> But it's there: http://ftp.acc.umu.se/cdimage/wheezy_di_beta2/
>
> All links (click any arch) on the former page point to subdirect
Paul van der Vlis (09/09/2012):
> When I looked all links where to beta1, and there was also no
> information about the new beta2 release.
OK. That is strange, and I'm close to supposing your browser cache was
the reason: I had been careful, and pinged -www folks to get a website
(partial) rebuil
Hello,
tiny wrap-up for beta 2: the release happened one week after the
prospective date. Some tiny delays on various fronts added up and
explain that, but the overall results don't seem too bad to me.
That's why I'm going to propose the same timing for beta 3: 3 weeks for
development and bug fix
Cyril Brulebois, le Mon 10 Sep 2012 00:07:46 +0200, a écrit :
> Features expected to be merged:
> - UEFI support (Steve). Before anyone asks, and as far as I can tell:
>it's not about supporting secure boot.
> - IPv6 support in d-i (Philipp).
> - Possibly more xz-related unblocks (Ansgar).
>
Control: retitle -1 tpu: isc-dhcp/4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb7u1
Control: user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Control: usertags -1 = tpu
Le 19/08/2012 12:23, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
> I don't see any reasons why the version currently sitting in testing
> would not be the version in wheezy.
I've
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Features expected to be merged:
> - UEFI support (Steve). Before anyone asks, and as far as I can tell:
>it's not about supporting secure boot.
> - IPv6 support in d-i (Philipp).
> - Possibly more xz-related unblocks (Ansgar).
>
> If anybody wan
Just a quick suggestion. As a compromise, instead of enabling Xfce as the
"universal default" in tasksel *entirely* ... How about only enabling Xfce
as default for the CD* distribution, and leaving the default as GNOME for
all non-CD distributions? (DVD, netinst, ...)
That will express true "bipa
On 10 September 2012 06:07, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> If anybody wants to see something land into this release, it would be
> nice to mention it now instead of after the end of the merge window.
Is there potential to see pkgsel use apt-get instead of aptitude
(following the same change in tasksel)
Here is what is pending right now in git:
5 packages with UNRELEASED entries:
debian-installer-netboot-images
pkgsel
netcfg
debootstrap
libdebian-installer
debian-installer-netboot-images:
[ Didier Raboud ]
* Amend previous changelog to note the change of default mirror for
the build tow
Quoting Daniel Hartwig (mand...@gmail.com):
> Is there potential to see pkgsel use apt-get instead of aptitude
> (following the same change in tasksel)? There is already a patch
> committed. I'll give this more of a test this week with some induced
> errors during the installation.
I hesitated
22 matches
Mail list logo
