Hi all.
I couldn't find a solution to my problem on the web.
From:
http://www.us.debian.org/CD/netinst/
I downloaded the file debian-6.0.5-i386-businesscard.iso and burned it onto CD,
then tried to install Debian on my pc. Everything went fine until the `install
the base system' step, when th
Hello Samuel,
it's really not appreciated to see last minute changes to the d-i git
repository when one has been trying to get stuff in shape for weeks,
and trying to get some feedback of involved people (without much success
anyway, I must be doing it wrong). Surely you could have pinged?
(Yes i
Cyril Brulebois, le Thu 12 Jul 2012 14:37:30 +0200, a écrit :
> (Yes it's about hurd “only” or whatever, but that doesn't change the
> fact one has to prepare everything again, meaning needs for build power,
> network access, but also free time.)
Oops, really? I had no idea it could have such eff
Package: pkgsel
Severity: serious
Tags: d-i
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Can't exec "aptitude": No such file or directory at /usr/bin/debconf-apt-
progress line 130. line 2.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstab
* Ian Campbell [2012-07-10 15:31]:
> Martin tells me this is necessary for d-i to pick the correct kernel
> while installing.
Looks good. Hector, please apply after beta 1 is done.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 10:05 -0600, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Ian Campbell [2012-07-10 15:31]:
> > Martin tells me this is necessary for d-i to pick the correct kernel
> > while installing.
>
> Looks good.
Thanks.
> Hector, please apply after beta 1 is done.
I think I have push access mysel
* Ian Campbell [2012-07-12 10:14]:
> I think I have push access myself. I used to have access to the old
> monolithic svn (for Xen porting work). I presume it has been carried
> over to the git trees. So I can push myself after beta 1 assuming no one
> minds ;-) or beats me to it...
I was plannin
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 10:18 -0600, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Ian Campbell [2012-07-12 10:14]:
> > I think I have push access myself. I used to have access to the old
> > monolithic svn (for Xen porting work). I presume it has been carried
> > over to the git trees. So I can push myself after bet
debian-installer_20120712_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer_20120712.dsc
debian-installer_20120712.tar.gz
debian-installer_20120712_amd64.deb
debian-installer-images_20120712_amd64.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (ru
Since it only just went on the schedule, and I don't want those who
requested it to miss it. Also, other people with d-i skills should
come..
Noon tomorrow in the small talk room.
--
see shy jo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
/debian-installer/debian-installer_20120712_amd64.deb
Changes:
debian-installer (20120712) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ Cyril Brulebois ]
* Team upload.
.
[ Julien Cristau ]
* Update to 3.2.0-3 linux ABI.
* Follow symlinks when generating checksum files, so the guruplug paths are
reassign 681347 ftp.debian.org
VastOne wrote:
> Package: pkgsel
> Severity: serious
> Tags: d-i
> Can't exec "aptitude": No such file or directory at /usr/bin/debconf-apt-
> progress line 130. line 2.
aptitude's priority was downgraded to optional, but d-i still uses it to
install security upda
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 681347 ftp.debian.org
Bug #681347 [pkgsel] pkgsel: bussiness card and netinstall, Can't exec
"aptitude" after Select & Install Software
Bug reassigned from package 'pkgsel' to 'ftp.debian.org'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of
Samuel Thibault (12/07/2012):
> Cyril Brulebois, le Thu 12 Jul 2012 14:37:30 +0200, a écrit :
> > (Yes it's about hurd “only” or whatever, but that doesn't change the
> > fact one has to prepare everything again, meaning needs for build
> > power, network access, but also free time.)
>
> Oops, re
ION="Debian GNU/Linux installer"
DISTRIB_RELEASE="7.0 (wheezy) - installer build 20120712-00:02"
X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom
==
Installer hardware-summary:
==
uname -a: Linux ditest 3.2.0-3-
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:47:29 -0600
with message-id <20120712194729.ge5...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line Closing bug that's no longer relevant
has caused the Debian Bug report #418272,
regarding please add jscalibrate
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:40:13PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Since it only just went on the schedule, and I don't want those who
> requested it to miss it. Also, other people with d-i skills should
> come..
>
> Noon tomorrow in the small talk room.
Will the slot remain the same / has it been tent
Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:40:13PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Since it only just went on the schedule, and I don't want those who
> > requested it to miss it. Also, other people with d-i skills should
> > come..
> >
> > Noon tomorrow in the small talk room.
>
> Will the slo
Dear Yao, FourDollars and all Traditional Chinese users,
2012/7/11 Yao Wei (魏銘廷) :
> Some recommendations on input method:
>
> SCIM somehow stopped their maintenance. (But seems their maintenance
> started again by another people.)
Thanks to confirm. The upstream is not dead.
> Anyway, I would h
netcfg_1.82_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_1.82_amd64.udeb
netcfg-static_1.82_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
Reject Reasons:
no source found for netcfg 1.82 (netcfg_1.82_amd64.udeb).
no source found for netcfg 1.82 (netcfg-static_1.82_amd64.udeb).
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jul 2012 22:37:23 +0100
with message-id <4fff4393.8080...@debianpt.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#681055: Acer Aspire 1410
has caused the Debian Bug report #681055,
regarding Acer Aspire 1410
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 680926 3.11
Bug #680926 {Done: Christian PERRIER } [tasksel] tasksel:
Typo in bug number included in changelog
No longer marked as found in versions tasksel/3.11.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Your message dated Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:51:30 -0600
with message-id <20120712225130.gi5...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
and subject line No more .desc files...
has caused the Debian Bug report #279085,
regarding tasksel: Support executable .desc scripts
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
From what I read in this bug report, it suggest *two* things:
- include important packages in the standard task
- make it possible to unselect them
Joey clearly answered "no" to the second question, with the basic
argument that a package one would want eventually to drop from
important is probabl
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 618915 wishlist
Bug #618915 [tasksel] tasksel: Should provide an easy way to choose the
selected desktop environment
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 604100 wishlist
Bug #604100 [tasksel] tasksel: Please readd netatalk to file-server task:
protocol not _too_ old
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
6
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 581803 wishlist
Bug #581803 [tasksel] Should add a confirmation dialog after choosing tasks
before starting package installation
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'minor'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #tasksel (3.12) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Really depending on gdm3 in task-lxde-desktop (Closes: #680519).
> # * Use xul-ext-mozvoikko instead of transitional mozvoikko in
> #task-finnish-desktop. Closes: #680952
> # * Remove freedi
debian-installer-netboot-images_20120712_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer-netboot-images_20120712.dsc
debian-installer-netboot-images_20120712.tar.gz
debian-installer-7.0-netboot-amd64_20120712_all.deb
debian-installer-7.0-netboot-arme
Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of
the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New
packages are usually added to the override file about once a week.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jul 2012 06:02:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#637128: fixed in netcfg 1.82
has caused the Debian Bug report #637128,
regarding Should list available ESSID instead of prompting for one
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
netcfg_1.82_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_1.82.dsc
netcfg_1.82.tar.gz
netcfg_1.82_amd64.udeb
netcfg-static_1.82_amd64.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
Accepted:
netcfg-static_1.82_amd64.udeb
to main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_1.82_amd64.udeb
netcfg_1.82.dsc
to main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.82.dsc
netcfg_1.82.tar.gz
to main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.82.tar.gz
netcfg_1.82_amd64.udeb
to main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.82_amd64.udeb
Changes:
netcfg (1.82) unstable;
34 matches
Mail list logo
