Dear d-i hackers, I've been contacted by Paul Wise about FSF campaign on
"secure boot" [1] (thanks Paul!). As observed by various commenters over
the net, it is indeed striking that no FOSS distros is in there. I plan
to contact the FSF asking that Debian is listed as an endorser of the
campaign.
Hi
Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> Dear d-i hackers, I've been contacted by Paul Wise about FSF campaign on
> "secure boot" [1] (thanks Paul!). As observed by various commenters over
> the net, it is indeed striking that no FOSS distros is in there. I plan
> to contact the FSF asking that Debian i
Quoting Stefano Zacchiroli (lea...@debian.org):
> Dear d-i hackers, I've been contacted by Paul Wise about FSF campaign on
> "secure boot" [1] (thanks Paul!). As observed by various commenters over
> the net, it is indeed striking that no FOSS distros is in there. I plan
> to contact the FSF asking
Hello folks,
I'm wondering how many changes still need a commit in the various d-i
git repositories (ISTR at least Phil wanted to commit more changes), and
also which of them want an upload.
With the freeze approaching, it would probably be an idea to think about
cutting a beta release soonish, d
cdebconf_0.161_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.161.dsc
cdebconf_0.161.tar.gz
cdebconf-priority_0.161_all.udeb
cdebconf_0.161_amd64.deb
cdebconf-gtk_0.161_amd64.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.161_amd64.deb
libdebconfclient0-dev_0.161_amd64.deb
Your message dated Sun, 10 Jun 2012 23:35:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#411585: fixed in cdebconf 0.161
has caused the Debian Bug report #411585,
regarding cdebconf: values for question not deleted on unregister
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Accepted:
cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.161_amd64.udeb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.161_amd64.udeb
cdebconf-gtk_0.161_amd64.deb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk_0.161_amd64.deb
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.161_amd64.udeb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.161_amd64.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.161
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
cdebconf-gtk_0.161_amd64.deb: package says priority is extra, override says
optional.
Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debu
Olá pessoal, estou com dúvida de como criar dual-boot *Windows 7 (32bits)*e
*Debian 6.0 (32bits)*, queria saber como instalar e configurar sem perde
nenhum tipo de arquivo no meu computador passo a passo, por favor!
*Observação:* Eu já tenho dual-boot no meu computador (Ubuntu e o Windows
7), mas e
On 11.06.2012 03:29, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> I'm wondering how many changes still need a commit in the various d-i
> git repositories (ISTR at least Phil wanted to commit more changes), and
> also which of them want an upload.
I want to upload current version of busybox (plus a
On 11.06.2012 06:20, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> I want to upload current version of busybox (plus a few trivial
> upstream bugfixes) to unstable (it is currently in experimental
> due to releasing of d-i alpha and due to one change I tried to
> do for about a year, and which finally appears to be wor
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> Hello folks,
>
> I'm wondering how many changes still need a commit in the various d-i
> git repositories (ISTR at least Phil wanted to commit more changes), and
> also which of them want an upload.
It's likely that a mass upload is needed for l10n pur
12 matches
Mail list logo
