On 05/21/2012 11:22 PM, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Thats not a new thing - and still we dont have any such image in Debian.
non-free is not part of the official debian, yet we have non-free
archive areas, so that's not an argument.
some derivatives are building d-i images with firmware udebs from
non
Hi there.
I'm trying to understand how debian-installer works.
I found that when you start booting with rescue-mode there is a title
on blue background.
Also found that there debconf commands are declared in
debconf/srd/commands.h which depends on which frontend is load try to
do those stuffs ( lik
Heya,
On Montag, 21. Mai 2012, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Thats not a new thing - and still we dont have any such image in Debian.
/me likes
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/
even though I know it's not Debian ;-)
cheers,
Holger
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Hi.
I can see that over the years a couple of bug reports have been
submitted flagging that debian-installer can't manage existing encrypted
partitions during install. Given the relative technical ease of
integrating lvm/luks tools into a menu, I'm wondering if this hasn't
achieved any traction fo
On 05/22/2012 10:44 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
/me likes
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/unofficial/non-free/cd-including-firmware/
even though I know it's not Debian ;-)
right, but these images do not use non-free udebs, they just contain
non-free debs in pool/ on the medium.
--
Address:
On 12854 March 1977, Daniel Baumann wrote:
>> Thats not a new thing - and still we dont have any such image in Debian.
> non-free is not part of the official debian, yet we have non-free
> archive areas, so that's not an argument.
> some derivatives are building d-i images with firmware udebs fro
Le 21/05/2012 21:17, Cyril Brulebois a écrit :
It looks to me like a separate build is better as far as d-i is concerned.
Ok, the question is rather "can we add 45k worth of udeb to make working
on GTK3 easier in Debian" (i.e reduce the build time a lot by building
it only once), the extra ram
tags 638682 + patch
thanks
On 20/05/12 12:20, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
at some point in the future we want to change to only use the "new"
InRelease file. Which debootstrap currently does not support.
This is not RC, so i set it to important only, but if we can have
debootstrap additionally deal w
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 638682 + patch
Bug #638682 [debootstrap] [debootstrap] debootstrap does not support InRelease
file
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
638682: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/b
On 05/22/2012 12:52 PM, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
And both of you just miss the point.
i don't think so (for my part, that is).
We are NOT talking about udebs.
We are NOT talking about whatever debian-cd creates.
We are talking about the installer images. Those that "fall out of the
debian-instal
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/20120522-1/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 22 may 2012 15:29
Machine: VMWare Player 4 on HP Probook 4530s
Processor: Intel Core i5 2410M
Memory: 2 Gb
Partitions
s390-netdevice_0.0.31_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
s390-netdevice_0.0.31.dsc
s390-netdevice_0.0.31.tar.gz
s390-netdevice_0.0.31_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
Accepted:
s390-netdevice_0.0.31.dsc
to main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.31.dsc
s390-netdevice_0.0.31.tar.gz
to main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.31.tar.gz
s390-netdevice_0.0.31_s390.udeb
to main/s/s390-netdevice/s390-netdevice_0.0.31_s390.udeb
Changes:
s390-netdevice (0.0.
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> The patch can make use of "gpg" to extract the signed data from the
> InRelease file. I'm not sure it is necessary since the rest works just
> fine if given an InRelease file instead of a Release file. I kept that
> part commented in the patch and leave this decision to the ma
On 22/05/12 18:16, Joey Hess wrote:
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
The patch can make use of "gpg" to extract the signed data from the
InRelease file. I'm not sure it is necessary since the rest works just
fine if given an InRelease file instead of a Release file. I kept that
part commented in the patch an
I've noticed that when the kernel gets upgraded by apt-get upgrade that
it does *not* run flash-kernel on my Squeeze system.
I have a suspicion that the fact that the kernel name/version has not
changed might have something to do with it.
Before upgrade:
colin@muscat:~$ uname -a
Linux muscat 2.6
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #debootstrap (1.0.41) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Add support for InRelease files (Closes: #638682)
> #
> limit source debootstrap
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'debootstrap'
Limit currently set to 'source'
Source: libdebian-installer
Version: 0.80
Severity: important
Tags: d-i
Hi,
It seems that src/release.c:di_release_read_file can't read InRelease
files (yet) because it is not strictly an rfc822 file.
It would be nice to fix this in time for Wheezy so that we can
consider getting rid of Release{
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 673625 with 674060
Bug #673625 [cdebootstrap] cdebootstrap: Does not support InRelease files
673625 was not blocked by any bugs.
673625 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 673625: 674060
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pl
* Colin Tuckley [2012-05-22 18:08]:
> I've noticed that when the kernel gets upgraded by apt-get upgrade that
> it does *not* run flash-kernel on my Squeeze system.
This is a well known issue which has been resolved in testing/unstable:
flash-kernel (3.0~rc.2) experimental; urgency=low
* New
partman-auto-lvm_43_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto-lvm_43.dsc
partman-auto-lvm_43.tar.gz
partman-auto-lvm_43_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boo
On 22/05/12 21:25, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> This is a well known issue which has been resolved in testing/unstable:
>
> flash-kernel (3.0~rc.2) experimental; urgency=low
>
> * New kernel and initramfs hooks, new logic: flash-kernel always installs
> the latest version according to linux-v
The latest builds are bootable, presumably because the syslinux bug cited
above was fixed. This bug can be closed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/05
Same happened to me with daily images.
Attaching log for analysis.
Running apt-cdrom from a console:
~# /target/usr/bin/apt-cdrom
fails with a message it can open a shared library - libapt-pkg.so.4.12.
Also image attached.
--
Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,
Miguel Figueiredo
syslog.gz
Accepted:
partman-auto-lvm_43.dsc
to main/p/partman-auto-lvm/partman-auto-lvm_43.dsc
partman-auto-lvm_43.tar.gz
to main/p/partman-auto-lvm/partman-auto-lvm_43.tar.gz
partman-auto-lvm_43_all.udeb
to main/p/partman-auto-lvm/partman-auto-lvm_43_all.udeb
Changes:
partman-auto-lvm (43) unstab
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:04:22PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote:
[snip]
>
> Only two non-trivial things here: execution of ethtool_lite(if_name)
> and invocation of arping. I would put my money on the former (defined
> in ethtool_lite.c), because it uses low-level ioctls to query the
> interface
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 673997 grave
Bug #673997 [installation-reports] Report
Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal'
> retitle 673997 installer fails with use apt-cdrom to make this cd-rom
Bug #673997 [installation-reports] Report
Changed Bug title to 'installer
Your message dated Tue, 22 May 2012 23:45:32 +0100
with message-id <4fbc170c.7040...@debianpt.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#673156: wheezy netinst and businesscard images not
bootable
has caused the Debian Bug report #673156,
regarding wheezy netinst and businesscard images not bootable
to be mark
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* OLD BUILD:armel May 08 08:10 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_netboot
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_netboot.log
* OLD BUILD:armel May 08 08:13 buildd@ancina
29 matches
Mail list logo
