On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:01:38 -0500
Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Richard wrote:
> > Hi
> > I used the daily build 12/12/11 for a clean install on a amd64 machine,
> > the network dchp problem is fixed, but the graphical install still freezes
> > on the first page, or c
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 07:34:16AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> (reducing CC as I guess that most are subscribed to -devel)
>
> Quoting Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org):
>
> > I don't think these things are alike. Separating /var and /tmp from the
> > rest of the file systems is done because
On 12/16/2011 04:46 AM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> In all of the recent discussions about separate /usr partitions, most
> people seem to acknowledge them as unusual, special-purpose
> configurations, even those who use them.
I do *not* agree that there's such a consensus.
On 12/16/2011 04:46 AM, Jos
Package: installation-reports
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
The system will run a for upto an hour under causual usage (browsing the web,
checking email, writing openoffice docs, etc.). Then suddenly, the bottom 1/3
of the screen turns black, and the machine locks up.
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 09:54:06AM -0500, Chris wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> The system will run a for upto an hour under causual usage (browsing the web,
> checking email, writing openoffice docs, etc.). Then suddenly, t
I have this in my /var/log/syslog, repeated for probably about 100 lines or
so...
nSource: METHOD_CNT, nStatus: INVALID_STATE PROTECTION_FAULT Ch: 1/3 Class
0x004a Mthd 0x0db4 Data 0x0020:0x
System also runs fine under knoppix, so it does not seem to be hardware
related.
Do you h
Christian PERRIER wrote:
> I'm inclined to follow this advice and would indeed propose that the
> "atomic" partman-auto recipe is kept, however without a separate /usr
> partition (discussions on -devel and the current practice convinced me
> that a separate /usr is seomthing that probably belongs
On 16.12.2011 18:38, Joey Hess wrote:
> Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> I'm inclined to follow this advice and would indeed propose that the
>> "atomic" partman-auto recipe is kept, however without a separate /usr
>> partition (discussions on -devel and the current practice convinced me
>> that a separ
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 07:32:35PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 16.12.2011 18:38, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Christian PERRIER wrote:
> >> I'm inclined to follow this advice and would indeed propose that the
> >> "atomic" partman-auto recipe is kept, however without a separate /usr
> >> partition (di
Quoting Michael Biebl (bi...@debian.org):
> > I don't think that d-i should be on the leading edge of this discussion.
> > Once Debian has made up its mind, d-i can be updated to follow the
> > consensus.
>
> To me it looks like there is broad consensus that a separate /usr
> partition should be
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 09:11:22PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 12/16/2011 04:46 AM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > In all of the recent discussions about separate /usr partitions, most
> > people seem to acknowledge them as unusual, special-purpose
> > configurations, even those who use them.
>
>
Michael Biebl writes:
> On 16.12.2011 18:38, Joey Hess wrote:
>> Christian PERRIER wrote:
>>> I'm inclined to follow this advice and would indeed propose that the
>>> "atomic" partman-auto recipe is kept, however without a separate /usr
>>> partition (discussions on -devel and the current practic
Quoting asdf (a...@brokensolstice.com):
> Len, you nailed it. I'm surprised that my web searches didn't turn
> anything up. I searched everywhere wit that log entry information,
> and got nothing.
>
> Thank you for being so quick nab this. Not a bug after all.
Hmmm, from this, I wonder whethe
Steve Langasek wrote:
> There isn't. There's just a broad consensus among those who are talking
> about changing things.
Yes.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Josh Triplett wrote:
> Exactly my point, then. The guided partitioning option I mentioned
> makes /home, /usr, /var, and /tmp all separate partitions. You just
> said you don't want a separate /home, and you do want a separate /var.
> Thus, you have custom requirements that don't fit the guided o
On Dec 16, Josh Triplett wrote:
> A configuration with everything in one partition needs no extra
> configuration; anyone who wants such a configuration will like what the
> guided partitioner comes up with. A configuration with five separate
> partitions seems almost impossible to provide sensi
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 08:04:27PM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Hmmm, from this, I wonder whether I should just close the bug or
> reassign it to another package. For sure, we can't keep it assigned to
> installation-reports
Certainly either the kernel has a bug for this particular nvidia
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Michael Biebl wrote:
> > To me it looks like there is broad consensus that a separate /usr
> > partition should be considered deprecated and this option removed from
> > the installer.
>
> There isn't. There's just a broad consensus among those who are talking
> about chan
Hi Josh,
Seems you're as much passionate about this topic as I am! :)
At this point, I don't remotely hope to convince you, but perhaps you
will find some of my points valid.
On 12/17/2011 02:46 AM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Hence why I said "most people" (because I didn't want to imply
> unanimity)
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 04:13:50AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Seems you're as much passionate about this topic as I am! :)
> At this point, I don't remotely hope to convince you, but perhaps you
> will find some of my points valid.
Likewise. :)
> On 12/17/2011 02:46 AM, Josh Triplett wrote:
>
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:45 AM, richard wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:01:38 -0500
> Michael Gilbert wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Richard wrote:
>> > Hi
>> > I used the daily build 12/12/11 for a clean install on a amd64 machine,
>> > the network dchp problem is fixed, but the g
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:47:00 -0500
Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:45 AM, richard wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 19:01:38 -0500
> > Michael Gilbert wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Richard wrote:
> >> > Hi
> >> > I used the daily build 12/12/11 for a clean ins
22 matches
Mail list logo
