Re: oldsys-preseed: Convert to confmodule instead of using a preseed file to allow overrides

2011-08-24 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Loïc Minier [2011-08-17 00:05]: > - I'm not sure what the NONINTERACTIVE variable is for in >oldsys-preseed I think you can probably just get rid of NONINTERACTIVE. > - similarly, it might make sense to add a way to skip oldsys-preseed >entirely; maybe there's a feature to do that in

Re: oldsys-preseed: Convert to confmodule instead of using a preseed file to allow overrides

2011-08-24 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Loïc Minier [2011-08-22 14:52]: > Ok to commit and upload? > > I've tested this successfully on Thecus N2100 with yesterday's daily > sid network-console image (just replaced oldsys-preseed and its > functions in the initrd.gz). I'm not a debconf expert so I cannot properly evaluate the approa

Re: oldsys-preseed: Convert to confmodule instead of using a preseed file to allow overrides

2011-08-24 Thread Loïc Minier
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > I'm not a debconf expert so I cannot properly evaluate the approach > (and specifically patch 5/7), but I looked at the patches and they > look fine and given that you've tested the changes I'm happy with you > going ahead and commit. I don't think

Re: oldsys-preseed: Convert to confmodule instead of using a preseed file to allow overrides

2011-08-24 Thread Loïc Minier
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > I think you can probably just get rid of NONINTERACTIVE. Pushed a patch to this effect, attached in case you'd like to review the changes, but they are fairly mechanical > > - similarly, it might make sense to add a way to skip oldsys-preseed > >

Bug#594878: marked as done (flash-kernel: please add mv78xx0 support)

2011-08-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:32:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#594878: fixed in flash-kernel 3.0~rc.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #594878, regarding flash-kernel: please add mv78xx0 support to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#612376: marked as done (flash-kernel: please include efikamx support)

2011-08-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:32:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#612376: fixed in flash-kernel 3.0~rc.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #612376, regarding flash-kernel: please include efikamx support to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#620888: marked as done (flash-kernel: please add armhf support)

2011-08-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:32:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#620888: fixed in flash-kernel 3.0~rc.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #620888, regarding flash-kernel: please add armhf support to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#626434: marked as done (flash-kernel: please add u-boot script support)

2011-08-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:32:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#626434: fixed in flash-kernel 3.0~rc.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #626434, regarding flash-kernel: please add u-boot script support to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#631396: marked as done (flash-kernel: Please add support for Toshiba AC100)

2011-08-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:32:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#631396: fixed in flash-kernel 3.0~rc.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #631396, regarding flash-kernel: Please add support for Toshiba AC100 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Processing of flash-kernel_3.0~rc.1_armel.changes

2011-08-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
flash-kernel_3.0~rc.1_armel.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: flash-kernel_3.0~rc.1.dsc flash-kernel_3.0~rc.1.tar.gz flash-kernel_3.0~rc.1_armel.deb flash-kernel-installer_3.0~rc.1_armel.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franc

flash-kernel_3.0~rc.1_armel.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2011-08-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: flash-kernel-installer_3.0~rc.1_armel.udeb to main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel-installer_3.0~rc.1_armel.udeb flash-kernel_3.0~rc.1.dsc to main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_3.0~rc.1.dsc flash-kernel_3.0~rc.1.tar.gz to main/f/flash-kernel/flash-kernel_3.0~rc.1.tar.gz flash-kernel_3.

Bug#639057: rootskel: FTBFS: /usr/lib/klibc/include/linux/posix_types.h:47:29: fatal error: asm/posix_types.h: No such file or directory

2011-08-24 Thread Colin Watson
reassign 639057 libklibc-dev thanks On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:01:05PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > amd64. > > Relevant part: > > make[2]: Entering directory > > `/build/rootskel-soNXDW/rootskel-1.97/src-bootfloppy' > >

Processed: Re: Bug#639057: rootskel: FTBFS: /usr/lib/klibc/include/linux/posix_types.h:47:29: fatal error: asm/posix_types.h: No such file or directory

2011-08-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 639057 libklibc-dev Bug #639057 [src:rootskel] rootskel: FTBFS: /usr/lib/klibc/include/linux/posix_types.h:47:29: fatal error: asm/posix_types.h: No such file or directory Bug reassigned from package 'src:rootskel' to 'libklibc-dev'. Bu

Bug#605384: marked as done (d-i should use dpkg --force-unsafe-io to optimize installation time)

2011-08-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:32:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#605384: fixed in base-installer 1.121 has caused the Debian Bug report #605384, regarding d-i should use dpkg --force-unsafe-io to optimize installation time to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#637432: marked as done (kernel choice offers unusable kernel)

2011-08-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:32:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#637432: fixed in base-installer 1.121 has caused the Debian Bug report #637432, regarding kernel choice offers unusable kernel to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Processing of base-installer_1.121_i386.changes

2011-08-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
base-installer_1.121_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: base-installer_1.121.dsc base-installer_1.121.tar.gz base-installer_1.121_all.udeb bootstrap-base_1.121_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) --

base-installer_1.121_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2011-08-24 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: base-installer_1.121.dsc to main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.121.dsc base-installer_1.121.tar.gz to main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.121.tar.gz base-installer_1.121_all.udeb to main/b/base-installer/base-installer_1.121_all.udeb bootstrap-base_1.121_i386.udeb to mai