Please wait, I would like to review it first before comitting it.
Thanks
Javier
Pd: Sorry for top-posting, a limitation of my mobile device.
El 20/08/2011 22:16, "Christian PERRIER" escribió:
Quoting Javier Fernandez-Sanguino (j...@debian.org):
> I will update the d-i translation when I have
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.26+squeeze1
Severity: wishlist
I'm filing this against debootstrap because the system was installed
using debootstrap and /etc/network/interfaces isn't owned by any
package, so my best guess is that the file was created by debootstrap.
Feel free to reassign this
reassign 638718 ifupdown
thanks
Sascha Silbe wrote:
> I'm filing this against debootstrap because the system was installed
> using debootstrap and /etc/network/interfaces isn't owned by any
> package, so my best guess is that the file was created by debootstrap.
> Feel free to reassign this ticket
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 638718 ifupdown
Bug #638718 [debootstrap] debootstrap: please add loopback configuration to
/etc/network/interfaces
Bug reassigned from package 'debootstrap' to 'ifupdown'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions debootstrap/1.0.26+squ
kbd-chooser_1.62_sparc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
kbd-chooser_1.62.dsc
kbd-chooser_1.62.tar.gz
kbd-chooser_1.62_sparc.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...
Accepted:
kbd-chooser_1.62.dsc
to main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_1.62.dsc
kbd-chooser_1.62.tar.gz
to main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_1.62.tar.gz
kbd-chooser_1.62_sparc.udeb
to main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_1.62_sparc.udeb
Override entries for your package:
kbd-chooser_1.62.dsc - source d
Quoting Timur Birsh (t...@linukz.org):
> Hi Christian,
>
> > Unfortunately, that has to wait...for wheezy to be released. The
> > spellchecker runs on people.debian.org and this machine is currently
> > running lenny. It should run squeeze soon, but aspell-kk isn't
> > available in it either.
>
>
I think this is a wontfix, unless at some point in the future
it becomes common for busybox to be built with xz support. Otherwise,
for the small benefit of slightly smaller base debs, we will prevent
people running debootstrap on the wide variety of embedded host systems,
which could have severe
Ben, I don't understand your patch for this at all.
The error message you showed is "umount: /proc: device is busy."
How can umount -n avoid it trying to umount the wrong /proc?
Also, portability is a concern. busybox umount does not support -n,
for example.
When I run debootstrap, it ends succes
Your message dated Sun, 21 Aug 2011 16:21:35 -0400
with message-id <20110821202135.ga8...@gnu.kitenet.net>
and subject line closing, not a debootstrap bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #616146,
regarding configuring "bootstrap-base" failed with error code 1
to be marked as done.
This means that
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 16:21 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Ben, I don't understand your patch for this at all.
> The error message you showed is "umount: /proc: device is busy."
> How can umount -n avoid it trying to umount the wrong /proc?
It not only inhibits umount from updating /etc/mtab, but also
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> It not only inhibits umount from updating /etc/mtab, but also means that
> it never uses /etc/mtab to canonicalize the given path.
That seems very doubtful. Especially since I tried applying your patch and
pbuilder --create still fails:
I: mounting /proc filesystem
mount: /
Your message dated Sun, 21 Aug 2011 22:47:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#631087: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.36
has caused the Debian Bug report #631087,
regarding debootstrap mount cleanup is fragile and currently broken
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Sun, 21 Aug 2011 22:47:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#637363: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.36
has caused the Debian Bug report #637363,
regarding debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 21 Aug 2011 22:47:40 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#637363: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.36
has caused the Debian Bug report #637363,
regarding debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 18:22 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > It not only inhibits umount from updating /etc/mtab, but also means that
> > it never uses /etc/mtab to canonicalize the given path.
>
> That seems very doubtful. Especially since I tried applying your patch and
> pbuil
debootstrap_1.0.36_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debootstrap_1.0.36.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.36.tar.gz
debootstrap_1.0.36_all.deb
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.36_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UN
Accepted:
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.36_all.udeb
to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap-udeb_1.0.36_all.udeb
debootstrap_1.0.36.dsc
to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.36.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.36.tar.gz
to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.36.tar.gz
debootstrap_1.0.36_all.deb
to main/d/debootstrap
18 matches
Mail list logo
