Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 637284 installation-reports
Bug #637284 [wnpp] Can't install wheezy on a 2011 iMac
Bug reassigned from package 'wnpp' to 'installation-reports'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
637284: htt
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
Successful installation of Debian Wheezy/Testing on Dell D430 via USB flash
drive. Burnt the iso image to USB after reading the manual to use the command:
cat debian.iso > /dev/sdX.
Successful booting from USB stick and presented with all options:
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2011 10:27:43 +0100
with message-id <201108101027.43816.el...@debianpt.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#637289: installation-reports: Installation Debian
Wheezy weekly-builds 08-08-2011 text=successful gui=not good
has caused the Debian Bug report #637289,
regarding ins
On 10/08/11 6:55 PM, Gergely Nagy wrote:
reassign 637284 installation-reports
thanks
Installation reports (failure or success) should not be reported against
the "Work Needing and Prospective Packages" virtual package, but against
installation-reports.
Ah, thanks Gergely -- I'm still new to th
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 11:01:22PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Excerpts from Christian PERRIER's message of 2011-08-05 09:54:11 +0200:
> > Would you mind, when possible (back from your "holidays"), resyncing
> > D-I git with the uploaded 1.66 and 1.67 packages?
>
> I've now pushed everything
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 07:44:38AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> I, for one, would vote for uploading to unstable. It is time to test
> *now*. Closer to wheezy release might be too laste.
Agreed, just go for unstable and (obviously) be responsive in case of
breakage. If you think the changes
On Wed, August 10, 2011 11:15, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 07:44:38AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>> I, for one, would vote for uploading to unstable. It is time to test
>> *now*. Closer to wheezy release might be too laste.
>
> Agreed, just go for unstable and (obviously) be
Hi,
Very recently Wheezy moved to kernel Linux 3.0, which is being used to install
and for the installed system.
It would be useful feedback if you test with the current kernel.
Can you test and report against such cd images [1] ?
1 -
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-l
Hi!
Sorry I've discovered this bug report only recently. I'm dealing with
this failure since about 4-5 months. And I'm wondering what is the
purpose of weekly generated DVD-images when the distribution can't be
installed from them during the last 4-5 months?
How to reproduce this? It would be eno
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.34
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
debootstrap fails to build from source on GNU/kFreeBSD. Please consider
attached patch to fix the problem.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.2
APT prefers stable-u
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.34
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
While cross-deboostraping a linux-i386 chroot using kfreebsd-amd64 host:
$ sudo debootstrap --foreign --arch=i386 squeeze /tmp/test
/usr/sbin/debootstrap: 425: cannot create /tmp/test/test-dev-null
Robert Millan, le Wed 10 Aug 2011 13:36:03 +0200, a écrit :
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ VERSION := $(shell sed 's/.*(\(.*\)).*/\
>
> MAKEDEV := /sbin/MAKEDEV
>
> -ifneq ($(shell uname),GNU)
> +ifeq ($(shell uname),Linux)
> all: devices.tar.gz
> else
> all:
Mmm, debootstrap should actually be an Arch
2011/8/10 Samuel Thibault :
> Mmm, debootstrap should actually be an Arch:any package then. ATM,
> if one uploads it from kfreebsd or hurd, Linux systems won't have
> devices.tar.gz.
Yes it should IMO. Note however that my patch isn't a regression in this area.
--
Robert Millan
--
To UNSUBS
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 637297 + pending
Bug #637297 [debootstrap] FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
637297: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637297
Debian Bu
debootstrap_1.0.35_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debootstrap_1.0.35.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.35.tar.gz
debootstrap_1.0.35_all.deb
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.35_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
--
To UN
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:17:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#637297: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.35
has caused the Debian Bug report #637297,
regarding FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:17:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#637298: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.35
has caused the Debian Bug report #637298,
regarding broken cross-debootstraps (--foreign) with host=kfreebsd and
target=linux
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Accepted:
debootstrap-udeb_1.0.35_all.udeb
to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap-udeb_1.0.35_all.udeb
debootstrap_1.0.35.dsc
to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.35.dsc
debootstrap_1.0.35.tar.gz
to main/d/debootstrap/debootstrap_1.0.35.tar.gz
debootstrap_1.0.35_all.deb
to main/d/debootstrap
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:59:26 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#637297 closed by Colin Watson
(Bug#637297: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.35)
has caused the Debian Bug report #571523,
regarding debootstrap "--foreign" should not perform check_sane_mount()
to be marked as d
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 637298 571523
Bug#637298: broken cross-debootstraps (--foreign) with host=kfreebsd and
target=linux
Bug#571523: debootstrap "--foreign" should not perform check_sane_mount()
Forcibly Merged 571523 637298.
> thanks
Stopping processing
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20110106+squeeze3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-CC: Martin Michlmayr
Hi,
Attached is a patch to add support for the Buffalo Linkstation Mini into
the script used to run d-i. Reviewed by Martin Michlmayr, I included his
suggestions.
Regards,
benjamin
Package: partman-ext3
Version: 65
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-CC: Martin Michlmayr
Hi,
Attached is a patch to add a check for the Buffalo Linkstation Mini as
it's being supported by d-i. Linkstation LiveV3 might also be included
one day, but I can't test this as I don't have the har
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 01:47:37PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Mmm, debootstrap should actually be an Arch:any package then. ATM,
> if one uploads it from kfreebsd or hurd, Linux systems won't have
> devices.tar.gz.
That's a special case of the general problem that there exist
Architecture: al
Hi Hector,
Le mercredi 10 août 2011 à 16:27 +0100, Hector Oron a écrit :
> 2011/8/10 Martin Michlmayr :
> > * Benjamin Cama [2011-08-04 18:20]:
>
> >> Thanks. I will submit this patch if you think it's ok.
>
> > Sure. Presumably Hector Oron will apply the patch for you when you
> > file a bug.
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.35
debootstrap was install per the manual install method in section "D.3.2.
Install debootstrap" of
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/apds03.html.en
The result:
# /usr/sbin/debootstrap --arch=amd64 squeeze /mnt/deb
/http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian
E: C
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.35
Follow up on the report I just submitted.
> # /usr/sbin/debootstrap --arch=amd64 squeeze /mnt/deb
> /http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian
> E: Couldn't work out current architecture
Note that kludging the debootstrap script at line 402 as follows:
else
# e
Hello,
2011/8/10 Benjamin Cama :
>> >> Thanks. I will submit this patch if you think it's ok.
>>
>> > Sure. Presumably Hector Oron will apply the patch for you when you
>> > file a bug.
Patch applied on version control system. Thanks.
--
Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. -
Please discard this. Resent to the original bug report. Didn't know how your
system worked.
- Whit
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110810164122.ga23
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 637366 637363
Bug#637363: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system
Bug#637366: debootstrap 1.0.35 fails to accept --arch=amd64 on CentOS 5.6 system
Merged 637363 637366.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Whit Blauvelt, le Wed 10 Aug 2011 12:19:36 -0400, a écrit :
> # /usr/sbin/debootstrap --arch=amd64 squeeze /mnt/deb
> /http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian
There is a spurious '/' in front of http://
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
That's spurious in my report because of not fully undoing my text editor's
word wrap "feature," which broke the line there and started the second line
with "# /" - I only noticed the "# " part when I reunited it.
Anyway, the bug occurred without the spurious "/". Sorry that confused the
report.
W
Just to verify my memory, I checked the history, and all test invocations
indeed were:
/usr/sbin/debootstrap --arch=amd64 squeeze /mnt/deb
http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian
(aside from also trying "--arch amd64")
Sorry again for the stray "/" in the report.
Whit
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to d
cdebconf_0.157_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.157.dsc
cdebconf_0.157.tar.gz
cdebconf-priority_0.157_all.udeb
cdebconf_0.157_amd64.deb
cdebconf-gtk_0.157_amd64.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.157_amd64.deb
libdebconfclient0-dev_0.157_amd64.deb
retitle 637363 should fallback to uname to determine current architecture
thanks
Whit Blauvelt, le Wed 10 Aug 2011 12:19:36 -0400, a écrit :
> # /usr/sbin/debootstrap --arch=amd64 squeeze /mnt/deb
> /http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian
> E: Couldn't work out current architecture
>
> Removing the "="
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:32:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#442293: fixed in cdebconf 0.157
has caused the Debian Bug report #442293,
regarding needs a dpkg-preconfigure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:32:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#451130: fixed in cdebconf 0.157
has caused the Debian Bug report #451130,
regarding cdebconf deb does not initalise the template database, which is
needed to work out of the box
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Wed, 10 Aug 2011 18:32:17 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#537536: fixed in cdebconf 0.157
has caused the Debian Bug report #537536,
regarding missing hacks to run config script, do template autoload, etc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Accepted:
cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb
cdebconf-gtk_0.157_amd64.deb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk_0.157_amd64.deb
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.157_amd64.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.157
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 08:34:12PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> --arch is the target architecture, not the current architecture. It
> needs the latter to know how to deal with some details. debootstrap
> should probably resort to uname in such case.
Note in the default case (if I understand c
Whit Blauvelt, le Wed 10 Aug 2011 15:09:15 -0400, a écrit :
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 08:34:12PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > --arch is the target architecture, not the current architecture. It
> > needs the latter to know how to deal with some details. debootstrap
> > should probably resor
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:13:31PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Also note "target" is an ambiguous term - the target in normal English is
> > the existing object which receives the new thing
>
> That is the meaning here: on which machine you will run the installed
> debian system.
Ah, but w
Whit Blauvelt, le Wed 10 Aug 2011 15:49:23 -0400, a écrit :
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:13:31PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > > Also note "target" is an ambiguous term - the target in normal English is
> > > the existing object which receives the new thing
> >
> > That is the meaning here:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:52:36PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> It can't be the "target" of debootstrap, since debootstrap is already
> running in it. Think of it (the host, Centos) as the hand which is
> holding the dart (debootstrap) to the target (the actual machine running
> the just-instal
clone 637363 -1
retitle -1 explain what "target" means
severity -1 wishlist
thanks
Whit Blauvelt, le Wed 10 Aug 2011 16:21:00 -0400, a écrit :
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 09:52:36PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > It can't be the "target" of debootstrap, since debootstrap is already
> > running
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* FAILED BUILD: mipsel Aug 11 00:07 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial.log
* FAILED BUILD: mipsel Aug 11
45 matches
Mail list logo
