Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
> Ok, does the attached patch sound sane? (it does work in my tests at least)
I didn't answer the question directly in my previous answer.
Yes it sounds sane, so you're welcome to apply it (and even upload if
you wish...no problem for me). Thanks
Quoting Regis Boudin (re...@boudin.name):
> Hi folks,
>
> I noticed that today, gcc 4.6.1 was uploaded, which means the current
> cdebconf 0.155 will FTBFS. Is it time to release and upload 0.156 to
> fix this issue ? I believe the breaking of tasksel on Hurd should be
> fixed as well, now.
>
> I
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
> There is one glitch in the main menu BTW. I don't know if it is on
> purpose that the language question is always asked in english, but the
> title is asked in the previously-selected language, which makes some
> sort of mixture. I mean for instanc
Package: console-setup
Version: 1.73
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
When setupcon uses the the wrapper script setfont from kbd-compat, it uses
the parameter -C which is only supported by the original from kbd.
Because kbd-compat depends on console-tools, the patch changes the search
order: first loo
Christian PERRIER, le Tue 28 Jun 2011 07:12:56 +0200, a écrit :
> Could we imagine, some day, having this combined with a voice-command
> interface?
Generic-purpose voice recognition does not work very well. For
particular purpose it may work not so bad. We have very little libre
software for that
I am testing upgrades from lenny to squeeze in a VM. To get as close as
possible to my existing system I used the lenny installer, but the new
installer reportedly supports lenny too. If I use it, will I get the
same setup in the end? In particular, I need software RAID with the
same metadata fo
Hi,
A while back, I blogged about success in installing to an NBD device[1].
Unfortunately, that was only partial success; that is, while it works
perfectly well as far as partman is concerned (and therefore also the
base-installer step), beyond that things go a bit wrong:
- /usr/lib/finish-insta
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:07:55PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> I am testing upgrades from lenny to squeeze in a VM. To get as close as
> possible to my existing system I used the lenny installer, but the new
> installer reportedly supports lenny too. If I use it, will I get the
> same setup in th
At http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.2.1/$arch/iso-cd/ (i386,amd64
etc.) reads the following text:
Daily build # for i386, using installer build from squeeze
These images will install the testing version of Debian, currently
Wheezy.
See the top-level daily directory for
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 06:56 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Regis Boudin (re...@boudin.name):
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I noticed that today, gcc 4.6.1 was uploaded, which means the current
> > cdebconf 0.155 will FTBFS. Is it time to release and upload 0.156 to
> > fix this issue ? I believ
cdebconf_0.156_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.156.dsc
cdebconf_0.156.tar.gz
cdebconf-priority_0.156_all.udeb
cdebconf_0.156_amd64.deb
cdebconf-gtk_0.156_amd64.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.156_amd64.deb
libdebconfclient0-dev_0.156_amd64.deb
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:03:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#442287: fixed in cdebconf 0.156
has caused the Debian Bug report #442287,
regarding dpkg-reconfigure segfaults
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:03:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#625317: fixed in cdebconf 0.156
has caused the Debian Bug report #625317,
regarding cdebconf: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:03:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#628084: fixed in cdebconf 0.156
has caused the Debian Bug report #628084,
regarding cdebconf: tasksel debconf does not start in d-i
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
At bottom :-
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 00:43, Touko Korpela wrote:
> At http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.2.1/$arch/iso-cd/ (i386,amd64
> etc.) reads the following text:
>
> Daily build # for i386, using installer build from squeeze
>
> These images will install the testing versio
Accepted:
cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.156_amd64.udeb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.156_amd64.udeb
cdebconf-gtk_0.156_amd64.deb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk_0.156_amd64.deb
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.156_amd64.udeb
to main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.156_amd64.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.156
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 621628 + pending
Bug #621628 [libdebian-installer] libdebian-installer: Getting rid of unneeded
*.la / emptying dependency_libs
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
621628: h
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:13:10PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote:
>At http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.2.1/$arch/iso-cd/ (i386,amd64
>etc.) reads the following text:
>
> Daily build # for i386, using installer build from squeeze
>
> These images will install the testing version of D
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 02:32:49AM +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote:
>
>I don't think so. I downloaded the DVD image via jigdo and I had the
>older one downloaded through jigdo as well .
>
>The only difference between this image and the last image is of 314
>files (amd64 arch) . If it was wheezy, I would
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 15:38 -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:07:55PM -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > I am testing upgrades from lenny to squeeze in a VM. To get as close as
> > possible to my existing system I used the lenny installer, but the new
> > installer reportedly
Good morning,
What difference would it make to you if you were able to get
details of your products and services out to the people who need
to know about them?
How valuable would a list of 160,236 UK architects, contractors,
builders, designers and other related professionals be to you?
That’s
21 matches
Mail list logo
