Re: No network interface detected

On Saturday 16 April 2011 06:55:20 Ravi Roy wrote: [... ] > I would appreciate if I can get source repository where I can take source of > this package (udev_153-1). I would build it from source ... http://snapshot.debian.org/package/udev/ [...] -- Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel

Re: No network interface detected

Thanks Miguel :) On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Miguel Figueiredo wrote: > On Saturday 16 April 2011 06:55:20 Ravi Roy wrote: > > [... ] > > > I would appreciate if I can get source repository where I can take source > of > > this package (udev_153-1). I would build it from source ... > > http:

Bug#537535: Offer for help, first patch

Hi Joey > > First, I took a stab at implementing debconf-get-selections, see patch > > attached. It seems to work, but any feedback would be very welcome. I > > added entries to cdebconf.conf-dist for the --installer option, which I > > hope is the correct way. > > That's probably a good clean wa

Bug#245465: use swap size, not RAM

What if we looked at the size of available swap rather than RAM? People don't really expect to have their actual memory eaten by something that appears to be a disk filesystem (and used to be one). I'd say that eating some of swap space would be less surprising. In other words: a machine with 64

Bug#537535: Offer for help, first patch

Regis Boudin wrote: > Last question, how would you like me to provide patche(s) ? Is one for > each utility ok ? If you're going to have a lot of patches, it would probably make sense to keep them in git. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Debian installer build: failed or old builds

Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 17 00:03 buildd@barber build_cdrom_isolinux http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_cdrom_isolinux.log * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Apr 17 00:03 buildd@barber b