Package: debian-installer
Version: 20090123lenny8
Severity: high
while installing a Debian from the netinst 5.0.8 i386 iso image, using
"expert install", the step "Install the base system" hangs at 1%...
switching to the fourth console (alt+f4), i observe that aptitude is
trying to upgrade th
Package: tasksel
Version: 3.01
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Please add Kazakh environment task and update Kazakh desktop task. Please find
attached patches.
Thanks,
Timur
From fb9dc6b8c99c1c59df8e543c31362a1d043ad5b5
Hello,
I have added partial support for Efika devices into a branch for you to
review,
after nice work done by Loïc rewritting the base code.
Please comments on:
http://git.debian.org/?p=d-i/flash-kernel.git;a=commitdiff;h=fa8fdbc9607ebd892eba1e1c3b4ad12f710c901f
Best regards,
-- Hecto
Hi,
(CC debian-boot to see if someone there knows better)
2011/4/4 Arnaud Patard :
> Hector Oron writes:
>> I am not sure how current Debian subarchitectures map to. Is it just
>> a giving name? Do they map to platform devices in linux kernel? Do
>> they map to machine devices?
>
> I've not c
Hi Martin,
2011/4/4 Martin Michlmayr :
> * Hector Oron [2011-04-04 12:56]:
>> Please comments on:
>>
>> http://git.debian.org/?p=d-i/flash-kernel.git;a=commitdiff;h=fa8fdbc9607ebd892eba1e1c3b4ad12f710c901f
>
> Clint added a boot.scr file in his original patch. Is that no longer
> needed.
I
* Hector Oron [2011-04-04 12:56]:
> Please comments on:
>
> http://git.debian.org/?p=d-i/flash-kernel.git;a=commitdiff;h=fa8fdbc9607ebd892eba1e1c3b4ad12f710c901f
Clint added a boot.scr file in his original patch. Is that no longer
needed.
Also, my previous comments are not addressed:
| Al
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011, Hector Oron wrote:
> > Finally, is "mx51" going to be the name of the kernel flavour? Can
> > you have mx5 and mx6 in one kernel? What about different mx5x
> > platforms in one kernel?
> I am not sure which kernel flavour we should use, hence I dropped an
> email to debian-a
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011, Hector Oron wrote:
> static const char *supported_generic_subarches[] = {
> "dove",
matches mach-dove, no plat-dove
> "omap",
matches plat-omap, but no mach-omap (mach-omap1 supports OMAP1xxx and
mach-omap2 supports OMAP 2+ -- 2xxx, 3xxx, 4xxx).
> "omap4",
Hello,
2011/4/4 Loïc Minier :
> It would be nice if you could file a bug against linux to get the new
> flavor; I personally would recommend -mx5.
That's fine with me. I'll wait for the bug report until we had proper
patches for kernel.
> Technically, mx5 would only support mx51 right now, b
Loïc Minier writes:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011, Hector Oron wrote:
>> static const char *supported_generic_subarches[] = {
>> "dove",
>
> matches mach-dove, no plat-dove
>
>> "omap",
>
> matches plat-omap, but no mach-omap (mach-omap1 supports OMAP1xxx and
> mach-omap2 supports OMAP 2+ --
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #tasksel (3.02) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
> #
> # * Add Kazakh environment task. Closes: #620816
> #
> limit source tasksel
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'tasksel'
Limit currently set to 'source':'tasksel'
> tags
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 04:35:03PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
> I would say we want to install on which ever is mounted under /boot,
> so if /boot/boot.txt is present, then boot.scr is regenerated
> everytime kernel is installed.
I think that could be a good thing to do for all platforms.
--
To
Hi,
2011/4/4 Clint Adams :
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 04:35:03PM +0100, Hector Oron wrote:
>> I would say we want to install on which ever is mounted under /boot,
>> so if /boot/boot.txt is present, then boot.scr is regenerated
>> everytime kernel is installed.
>
> I think that could be a good thin
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
I made three partitions on two identical drives:
sd[ab]1, 1GB, raid1, /boot, ext4
sd[ab]2, 1GB, encrypted, swap
sd[ab]3, 319GB, raid1, encrypted, /, ext4
The installer indicated no problem. On first boot the root filesystem could not
be mounted.
I s
It is certainly possible that my CD drive is flaky. Do you know of a
diagnostic test in the Debian release that I could use to simply read
several known good CDs for errors?
Thanks,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Miguel Figueiredo [mailto:el...@debianpt.org]
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2011 1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 620805 apt-setup
Bug #620805 [debian-installer] installer hangs, while aptitude is waiting for
input
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'apt-setup'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions debian-installer/20090123lenny8
Package: installation-guide
Severity: normal
On section D.3.4.1. Create device files
cd /dev
MAKEDEV generic
The makedev command does not exist or its need has been deprecated(?) and
therefore should be removed.
if MAKEDEV is in use, then this should instead be applied to debootstrap(?) for
On Monday 04 April 2011 20:59:40 Tremblay, Mike A wrote:
> It is certainly possible that my CD drive is flaky. Do you know of a
> diagnostic test in the Debian release that I could use to simply read
> several known good CDs for errors?
For Debian CD images you can use md5sum for checking the inte
Package: flash-kernel
Version: 2.40
Severity: normal
Hello,
Could you consider the following patch which adds armhf support?
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 211acc7..b1fc18c 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ flash-kernel (2.40) UNRELE
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* OLD BUILD:armel Mar 23 10:01 joey@box build_iop32x_netboot
http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/build_iop32x_netboot.log
* OLD BUILD:armel Mar 23 10:04 joey@box
bu
i actually found later that the makedev package was missing, so this bug
should be reassigned to debootstrap.
best regards,
JC
21 matches
Mail list logo
