Source: busybox
Version: 1:1.18.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
your package no longer builds on kfreebsd-*. Not sure what to quote,
since it explodes quite badly. :D
Full build logs:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=busybox&suite=sid
→
https://buildd.debian.org
tags 618644 + pending
thanks
17.03.2011 10:20, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Source: busybox
> Version: 1:1.18.3-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
>
> Hi,
>
> your package no longer builds on kfreebsd-*. Not sure what to quote,
> since it explodes quite badly. :D
Yes I've seen this once i
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 618644 + pending
Bug #618644 [src:busybox] busybox: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
618644: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618644
De
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20110106+b1
Severity: normal
The initrd [1] dated 09 Dec 2010 does not seem to contain the 'sha1sum'
program. Because of this, after downloading Packages.gz it fails, saying that
the package list is corrupt. Switching to the log console (Alt+F4) shows that
in rea
package: win32-loader
sverity: wishlist
tags: patch, l10n
Please find the attached Swedish (sv) translation
--
brother
http://sis.bthstudent.se
# Copyright (C) 2007 Daniel Nylander
# Copyright (C) 2008, 2011 Martin Bagge
# This file is distributed under the same license as the win32-loader pa
tags 618663 +pending
thanks
On Thursday 17 March 2011 12:44:22 Martin Bagge / brother wrote:
> package: win32-loader
> sverity: wishlist
> tags: patch, l10n
>
> Please find the attached Swedish (sv) translation
Hi Martin, and thanks for your translation,
I committed it to the win32-loader repo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 618663 +pending
Bug #618663 [win32-loader] [l10n] Swedish (sv) strings for win32-loader
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
618663: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 310440 + pending
Bug #310440 [busybox-udeb] busybox-cvs: please enable mktemp
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 615926 + pending
Bug #615926 [busybox-udeb] busybox-udeb: missing shaXYZsum binaries
Bug #617204 [busybox-udeb] installation-report: /u
Probably you are the uploader of the following file(s) in
the Debian upload queue directory:
debian-installer-netboot-images_20110106.squeeze1.dsc
debian-installer-netboot-images_20110106.squeeze1.tar.gz
This looks like an upload, but a .changes file is missing, so the job
cannot be processed.
debian-installer-netboot-images_20110106.squeeze1_amd64.changes uploaded
successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer-netboot-images_20110106.squeeze1.dsc
debian-installer-netboot-images_20110106.squeeze1.tar.gz
debian-installer-6.0-netboot-amd64_20110106.squeeze1_all.deb
reassign 618648 busybox
fixed 618648 1:1.17.1-10
thanks
Quoting Roman Mamedov (r...@romanrm.ru):
> Package: debian-installer
> Version: 20110106+b1
> Severity: normal
>
> The initrd [1] dated 09 Dec 2010 does not seem to contain the 'sha1sum'
> program. Because of this, after downloading Packages
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 618648 busybox
Bug #618648 [debian-installer] [debian-installer] mipsel 'malta' initrd does
not contain the sha1sum program
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'busybox'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions debian-ins
Your message dated Thu, 17 Mar 2011 20:02:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#597116: fixed in debian-installer-netboot-images
20110106.squeeze1
has caused the Debian Bug report #597116,
regarding debian-installer-6.0-netboot-amd64: ..shouldn't these di-6.0-netboot
images, _suggest_ a
Notes:
Mapping squeeze to stable.
Mapping stable to proposed-updates.
Accepted:
debian-installer-6.0-netboot-amd64_20110106.squeeze1_all.deb
to
main/d/debian-installer-netboot-images/debian-installer-6.0-netboot-amd64_20110106.squeeze1_all.deb
debian-installer-6.0-netboot-armel_20110106.sque
Hey,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 08:57:15PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Sure, go ahead. Note that Samuel Thibault suggested setupcon should use
> the KDGKBMODE ioctl and check for K_RAW instead of KDGETMODE and check
> for KD_GRAPHICS; the code change is trivial. See
> http://lists.debian.org/201
Justin B Rye wrote:
> Chris is right that "try again to [do X]" is subtly awkward, but his
> suggested alternative "try and [do X] again" has the drawback of
> involving "try and" - an English idiom that styleguides discourage in
> formal writing.
Agreed.
> If at first you don't succeed... we co
Debian installer build overview
---
Failed or old builds:
* FAILED BUILD: hppa Mar 17 06:01 didaily@c3700 build_cdrom
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_cdrom.log
* FAILED BUILD: hppa Mar 17 06:01 didaily@c3700 build_netboot
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 607532
Bug #607532 {Done: Anton Zinoviev } [console-setup]
console-setup create empty keymap when reconfiguring (or upgrading)
> thank you
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
607532: http://bugs.debian.
18 matches
Mail list logo
